Nuovo libro recensito dal NYT che ne mette in evidenza alcuni punti deboli.
Da notare che, anche i critici, ora puntano più sugli errori di forma che non sull' incosistenza sostanziale della sua azione:
"...my final judgments on the senator did acknowledge his role in highlighting a number of security problems in the federal government, something previous writers had been reluctant to do. But I also described him as a serial slanderer who poisoned political debate, weakened government morale and made America look ridiculous in the eyes of the world..."
Da notare che, anche i critici, ora puntano più sugli errori di forma che non sull' incosistenza sostanziale della sua azione:
"...my final judgments on the senator did acknowledge his role in highlighting a number of security problems in the federal government, something previous writers had been reluctant to do. But I also described him as a serial slanderer who poisoned political debate, weakened government morale and made America look ridiculous in the eyes of the world..."
