Visualizzazione post con etichetta scienza e fede. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta scienza e fede. Mostra tutti i post

giovedì 5 dicembre 2024

compatibilità

 Ogni volta che la scienza fa un passo avanti ci ritroviamo sempre qui a chiederci se la nostra dottrina resta "compatibile" con quanto si sa ora. Il cristianesimo è "compatibile" con l'evoluzionismo? Il cristianesimo è compatibile con la materia oscura? Il cristianesimo è compatibile con la teoria delle stringhe? Eccetera. In genere la compatibilità teorica ci fa sudare sette camice per essere raggiunta. Io ho gettato la spugna e ora tendo a negarla. Il cristianesimo è compatibile con l'evoluzionismo? Ma certo, in fondo tutto puo' essere reso compatibile se ci lavori sopra, anche Tolomeo puo' essere reso compatibile con Copernico. Basta attaccare un'orrenda patch alla teoria più semplice - nel caso di Tolomeo gli epicicli - e il gioco è fatto. La mia idea è di liberarsi di queste "escrescenze" e rassegnarsi a dire "no". Anche perché parliamo di compatibilità teorica, resterebbe comunque a nostra disposizione una compatibilità pratica, che secondo me si afferma con forza. Analogia: nella fisica teorica esistono due modelli teoricamente incompatibili che convivono armoniosamente da decenni, quello gravitazionale e quello della meccanica quantistica. Di fatto sappiamo quando applicare il primo e quando applicare il secondo, anche se non c'è una regola precisa nessuno incontra difficoltà di sorta. Volendo, potremmo persino renderli "compatibili" in un unico modello di gravitazione quantistica ma perché farlo visto che la cosa richiede un notevole sforzo e ai fini pratici servirebbe a ben poco? Il cristiano potrebbe ragionare allo stesso modo: posso guardare il mondo indossando due occhiali, quello della scienza o quello della fede, riesco anche a distinguere bene i momenti in cui il primo è più adatto del secondo (e viceversa). Cosa mi interessa allora constatare che non potrà mai esistere un unico occhiale quando non ho difficoltà ad alternare i due che già possiedo?


***


Piccolo pit stop per fare il punto della discussione. Registro un generalizzato dissenso alle mie tesi inquadrato su questa linea: fede e scienza si occupano di ambiti diversi. Dopodiché, si passa a dire cose come: "mentre la chimica studia X, la teologia studia Y". Ma fare questa operazione di confronto tra chimica e teologia significa tenere a distanza realtà più scomode. Esempio, dalla chimica è un attimo saltare alla biologia, dalla biologia all'evoluzionismo e dall'evoluzionismo alla genetica comportamentale, alla psicologia evoluzionista, all'evoluzionismo cultrale, alla sociobiologia, eccetera. Chiamiamolo il "quadrivio imbarazzante". Queste discipline, adottando il metodo della scienza, ipotizzano risposte a domande del tipo "perché crediamo in una divinità?", "perché abbiamo comportamenti morali?", "perché cerchiamo un senso nelle cose?", "che funzione hanno le chiese?", eccetera. Beh, è un po' difficile considerare queste domande come "appartenenti ad un ambito diverso". E se si accettano certe risposte - di solito orientate nel vedere la fede religiosa come un'illusione vantaggiosa in molti contesti - non si puo' poi affermare a cuor leggero la "compatibilità" teorica tra fede e scienza. Da qui la mia proposta di abbandonare questa pretesa compatibilità teorica in favore della compatibilità pratica descritta nel post. Da qui la proposta di cambiare la metafora degli "ambiti" con quella degli "occhiali". Ultima considerazione: se sembro un po' assertivo è solo perché, pressato dai tempi, non domino al meglio la scrittura. In realtà ho maturato queste posizioni negli ultimi mesi (nemmeno anni) per cui sono anch'io in ricerca di una compatibilità credibile poiché non intendo certo rinunciare ai frutti preziosi del "quadrivio imbarazzante" di cui sopra.

martedì 30 maggio 2017

Dio in laboratorio

IS GOD IN THE LAB?-The Scientist as Rebel (New York Review Books (Paperback)) by Freeman Dyson
Prendiamo due scienziati di vaglia per illustrare due modi molto differenti do vedere il legame tra fede e scienza.
Feynman e la religione: a lui interessava come la fede interagisce sul modo di fare ricerca...
... Feynman’s voice and personality come through clearly. He talks about real people and their problems, not about philosophical abstractions. He is interested in religion as a way for people to make sense of their lives, but he is not interested in theology...
Polkingkorne e la religione: a lui interessava il raccordo sostanziale tra dottrina cristiana e teorie della scienza...
... Polkinghorne has the opposite bias. He is a scientist who is also an ordained minister of the Church of England. To be ordained, he went through formal training in theology. For him, theology is as real and as serious as science...
P: religione e scienza come portatrici di ordine nella conoscenza...
... Polkinghorne has the opposite bias. He is a scientist who is also an ordained minister of the Church of England. To be ordained, he went through formal training in theology. For him, theology is as real and as serious as science...
P fa un parallelo tra due lotte per la verità nei due ambiti (scienza e fede): 1) meccanica quantistica e 2) la reale natura di Gesù...
... Polkinghorne compares two historic intellectual struggles, one from science and one from religion. From science he takes the discovery and development of quantum mechanics, a struggle that has lasted from the beginning to the end of the twentieth century. From religion he takes the theological understanding of the nature of Jesus, a struggle that lasted from the time when Saint Paul was writing his letters shortly after Jesus’ death to the modern era of diverse views and diminished certainties...
Per P. la conoscenza è unica...
... Polkinghorne argues from the detailed concordance of the two struggles that science and theology are two aspects of a single intellectual adventure. He sees theology as dealing with God in essentially the same way as science is dealing with nature...
Obiezione a P: forse non distingue al meglio tra parole e cose. Le prime dipendono dalla cultura, le seconde dalla natura...
... To share it, you must disregard a crucial difference between science and theology. When all is said and done, science is about things and theology is about words. Things behave in the same way everywhere, but words do not. Quantum mechanics works equally in all countries and in all cultures...
Trinità e Incarnazione sono parole senza senso in Giappone...
... If you have not grown up in Polkinghorne’s culture, where words such as “incarnation” and “trinity” have a profound meaning, you cannot share his vision...
***
Per F. la religione è una stampella psicologica da rispettare...
... Feynman has no interest in scholastic arguments. He is concerned only with human problems. He has a deep respect for religion, because he sees it as helping people to behave well toward one another and to be brave in facing tragedy...
F: lo studente che crede soffre nel rapportarsi con la scienza, lui lo constata in prima persona insegnando fisica...
... He writes about students who come to college from homes where religious belief is strong, and then find that exposure to modern science is calling their beliefs into question. He has seen at first hand the anguish that some of these students experience...
Il credente tocca con mano un conflitto genuino da ricomporre.
La riconciliazione è possibile ma è una prova in più per il credente a cui deve riservare energie cognitive impiegabili altrove...
... Most Christian believers are able to reconcile their general belief in God and in the teachings of Jesus with a considerable skepticism about details...
***
Tra religione e scienza c'è probabilmente anche una filiazione storica. Solo il cristianesimo possiede una teologia analitica… 
... It is a curious accident of history that the Christian religion became heavily involved with theology. No other religion finds it necessary to formulate elaborately precise statements about the abstract qualities and relationships of gods and humans. There is nothing analogous to theology in Judaism or in Islam. I do not know much about Hinduism and Buddhism, but my Asian friends tell me that these religions also have no theology. They have beliefs and stories and ceremonies and rules...
La teologia cristiana, abituando al pensiero analitico, è la madre di molta scienza. Questo spiegherebbe perché la scienza è fiorita soprattutto nei paesi cristiani...
... The prominence of theology in the Christian world has had two important consequences for the history of science. On the one hand, Western science grew out of Christian theology. It is probably not an accident that modern science grew explosively in Christian Europe and left the rest of the world behind. A thousand years of theological disputes nurtured the habit of analytical thinking that could also be applied to the analysis of natural phenomena...
Senonché, oggi, la teologia potrebbe essere vista come un ingombro...
... On the other hand, the close historical relations between theology and science have caused conflicts between science and Christianity that do not exist between science and other religions.... Polkinghorne writes books to prove to himself and to us that his theology and his science can live together harmoniously...
La teologia aggiunge: può essere vista sia come un ingombro che come il tentativo di rispondere a domande ulteriori.
Tuttavia, una cosa è certa: Gesù era un sapiente e la conoscenza è sempre stata ben vista nella tradizione cristiana...
... The Bible story tells us that when Jesus was twelve years old and his family was visiting Jerusalem, he seized the opportunity to spend three days talking with the learned doctors in the Temple, and all that heard him were astonished at his understanding. Whether that story is true or not, he must have had many opportunities to sharpen his understanding by talking with the learned doctors in Zippori....
Cafarnao. Un centro di pescatori illetterati? No, un centro di cultura greca...
... After visiting Capernaum, I no longer think of Peter and Andrew as simple fishermen. I think of them as young men about town, who made a living by fishing but were also immersed in the Greek culture of the city. ..
Gesù era uomo colto...
... Jesus was no simple peasant, but grew up in intimate contact with an urban and overwhelmingly Greek culture...
San Paolo era uomo colto...
... the man who took charge of the new religion, Saint Paul of Tarsus, was a thoroughly Hellenized Jew. Saint Paul preached to the learned men of Athens in their own language. In his writings he laid the foundations for what became orthodox Christian doctrine...
Si fa presto allora a parlare di raccordo tra scienza e fede. Il cristianesimo, per esempio, può essere vissuto in due modi completamente diversi. Il termine “religione” non ne coglie la complessità…
... This history has left Western civilization with a strangely divided legacy. On the one hand, the religion of Jesus as we find it in his teachings recorded in the gospels, a religion for ordinary people trying to find their way in a harsh world. On the other hand, the theology that turned the Christian religion into a demanding intellectual discipline, a breeding ground for scholars and ultimately for scientists. Feynman is writing about the first, Polkinghorne about the second...
Tra gli evangelisti solo Giovanni omaggia l’ approccio intellettualistico. Sarà soprattutto la teologia successiva a celebrarlo...
... The fourth gospel, the Gospel of Saint John, shows us a very different Jesus, much more Greek in spirit...

sabato 13 maggio 2017

Una scienza senza dio

Science without God - Science and Christianity in Pulpit and Pew by Ronald L. Numbers
La scienza “senza Dio” è affare relativamente recente…
… Students of nature have not always shunned the supernatural. It took centuries, indeed millennia, for naturalism to dominate the study of nature, and even at the beginning of the twenty-first century, as we shall see, a tiny but vocal group of "theistic scientists" is challenging…
La doppia valenza del termine “naturalismo”…
… Historians have employed the word naturalism to designate a broad range of views, from a purely methodological commitment to explaining the workings of nature without recourse to the supernatural, largely devoid of metaphysical implications about God, to a philosophical embrace of materialism, tantamount to atheism…
Il conio di Huxley era però in funzione “anti-cristiana”…
… When Thomas H. Huxley (1825-1895) coined the term "scientific naturalism" in 1892, he used it to describe a philosophical outlook that shunned the supernatural and adopted empirical science as the only reliable basis of knowledge about the physical, social, and moral worlds…
***
La prima forma di pensiero naturalista risale ai filosofi greci milesiani
… Recorded efforts to explain naturally what had previously been attributed to the whimsy of gods date back to the Milesian philosophers of the ancient Greek world, who, six centuries before the birth of Christianity, declared such phenomena as earthquakes, lightning, and thunder to be the result of natural causes…
Ippocrate
… Hippocratic physicians expanded the realm of the natural to include most diseases, including epilepsy, "the sacred disease."…
Seneca
… The first-century Roman philosopher Lucius Annaeus Seneca, ever suspicious of supernatural causation, calmed the fears of fellow citizens by assuring them that "angry deities" had nothing to do with most meteorological or astronomical events: "Those phenomena have causes of their own…
Il cristianesimo fu particolarmente a suo agio con la filosofia naturale…
… belief in natural causes and the regularity of nature antedated the appearance of Christianity, with its Judaic notion of God as creator and sustainer of the universe… Christianity could, and sometimes did, encourage the quest for natural explanations. Long before the birth of modern science and the appearance of "scientists" in the nineteenth century, the study of nature in the West was carried out primarily by Christian scholars known as natural philosophers, who typically expressed a preference for natural explanations over divine mysteries….
Un caso medievale
… for instance, Adelard of Bath (ca. io8o-ca. 1150), a much-traveled Englishman familiar with the views of Seneca, instructed his nephew on the virtues of natural explanations: "I will take nothing away from God: for whatever exists is from Him and because of Him….
Giovanni da Buridano
… The University of Paris cleric Jean Buridan (ca. 1295-ca. 1358), described as "perhaps the most brilliant arts master of the Middle Ages," contrasted the philosopher's search for "appropriate natural causes" with the common folk's erroneous habit of attributing unusual astronomical phenomena to the supernatural…
Altro caso…
… Nicole Oresme (ca. 1320-1382), who went on to become a Roman Catholic bishop, admonished that, in discussing various marvels of nature, "there is no reason to take recourse to the heavens…
Galileo buon cattolico…
… The Italian Catholic Galileo Galilei (1564-1642), one of the foremost promoters of the new philosophy, insisted that nature "never violates the terms of the laws imposed upon her." In a widely circulated letter to the Grand Duchess Christina, written in 1615, Galileo, as a good Christian, acknowledged the divine inspiration of both Holy Scripture and the Book of Nature-but insisted that interpreters of the former should have no say in determining the meaning of the latter. Declaring the independence of natural philosophy from theology, he asserted "that in disputes about natural phenomena one must begin not with the authority of scriptural passages but with sensory experience and necessary demonstrations."…
Qui andrebbe ricordato che la lotta contro Galileo ebbe per oggetto il merito più che il metodo delle sue ricerche.
L’anglicano Bacone
… the Anglican philosopher and statesman Francis Bacon (1561-1626) was preaching a similar message of independence, warning of "the extreme prejudice which both religion and philosophy hath received and may receive by being commixed together; as that which undoubtedly will make an heretical religion, and an imaginary and fabulous philosophy."…
***
La filosofia naturale rischiava di emarginare Dio. Il buon cattolico Cartesio fu il primo, secondo molti, a correrlo…
… When the French Catholic natural philosopher Rene Descartes (1596-165o) boldly constructed a universe of whirling ethereal fluids and speculated how the solar system could have been formed by the action of these vortices operating according to the God-ordained laws of nature, he acquired considerable notoriety for nearly pushing God out of the cosmos altogether…
L’accusa di Pascal a Cartesio…
… His pious fellow countryman Blaise Pascal (1623-1662) accused Descartes, somewhat unfairly, of trying to dispense with God altogether, according Him only "a flip of the finger in order to set the world in motion."…
Forse per non perdere lo stipendio, Cartesio rinnega Galileo…
… Fearing clerical retribution in the years after Galileo's trial, Descartes disingenuously declared his cosmogony to be "absolutely false."…
Boyle, la ricerca scientifica come preghiera
… The English chemist Robert Boyle (1627-i6gi)-as ardent an advocate of the mechanical philosophy as Descartes yet as pious as Pascal-viewed the discovery of the divinely established laws of nature as a religious act…
La profonda religiosità di Newton
… No one contributed more to the popular image of the solar system as a giant mechanical device than the University of Cambridge professor of mathematics Isaac Newton (1642-1727), a man of deep, if unorthodox, religious conviction, who unblushingly attributed the perfections of the solar system to "the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being."…
Forse vale la pena di introdurre una sottile distinzione tra cattolici – più inclini alla superstizione - e protestanti…
… the search for natural laws and mechanical explanations became a veritable Christian vocation, especially in Protestant countries, where miraculous signs and wonders were often associated with Catholic superstition…
***
Superstizioni in campo medico: cinquecento secolo chiave…
… Already by the sixteenth century, supernatural explanations of disease had largely disappeared from medical literature except in discussions of epidemics and insanity, which remained etiological mysteries, and venereal diseases, the wages of sin…
I preti favoriscono la diffusione delle medicine
… Priests and theologians may have placed greater emphasis on supernatural causes and cures, but in general they, too, easily accommodated new medical knowledge by maintaining that God usually effected His will through natural agencies rather than by direct intervention…
Il caso esemplare del vaiolo nelle colonie americane…
… Christians had long regarded smallpox, a frighteningly deadly and disfiguring disease, as God's ultimate scourge to punish sinners and bring them to their knees in contrition. Thus when an epidemic threatened to strike New England in 1721, the governor of Massachusetts called for a day of fasting and repenting of the sins that had "stirred up the Anger of Heaven against us." However, the Puritan Cotton Mather (1663-1728), one of the town of Boston's leading ministerial lights, offered an alternative to repentance-inoculation with an attenuated but live form of smallpox-in hopes of preventing the disease by natural means. Having heard rumors of successful inoculations against smallpox in Africa and the Middle East, Mather, a fellow of the Royal Society of London and a natural philosopher in his own right, proposed that the untested, potentially lethal procedure be tried in Boston. The best trained physician in town, William Douglass (1691-1752), fearing that inoculation would spread rather than prevent the disease and resenting the meddling of ministers in medical matters, urged Mather to rely instead on "the all-wise Providence of God Almighty" and quit trying to thwart God's will. Mather and five other clerics countered that such reasoning would rule out all medical intervention. Cannot pious persons, they asked, give into the method or practice without having their devotion and subjection to the All-wise Providence of God Almighty call'd in question? ... Do we not in the use of all means depend on GOD'S blessing?…
Un caso parallelo: la diffusione della meteorologia scientifica. Il tempo è voluto da Dio? Anche la ricerca scientifica!…
… The same process occurred in meteorology. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), who as a teenager in Boston had backed Douglass in his quarrel with Mather over smallpox inoculation, found himself on the opposite side of a similar debate a few decades later, after announcing the invention of a device to prevent another of God's judgments on erring humanity: lightning. When a French cleric denounced lightning rods as an inappropriate means of thwarting God's will, the American printer turned scientific celebrity scornfully replied, "He speaks as if he thought it presumption in man to propose guarding himself against the Thunders of Heaven! Surely the Thunder of Heaven is no more supernatural than the Rain, hail or Sunshine of heaven, against the Inconvenience of which we guard by Roofs & Shades without Scruple." Reflective Christians quickly accepted Franklin's logic…
Terremoti
… Reactions to the great earthquakes of 1727 and 1755 further illustrate the inroads of scientific naturalism on popular culture. On the night of October 29, 1727, a violent earthquake shook the northern colonies of America, producing widespread damage to property. Terrified residents, humbled by this apparent display of divine anger, set aside fast days and begged God… Thomas Prince (1687-1758), the Puritan pastor of Boston's Old South Church, preached a sermon entitled Earthquakes the Works of God and Tokens of His Just Displeasure… "Let the Natural Causes of Earthquakes be what the Wise Men of Enquiry please," he wrote. "They and their Causes are still under the government of HIM that is the GOD of Nature."… Professor John Winthrop IV (1714-1779) of Harvard College calmed the timorous with the assurance that, although God bore ultimate responsibility for the shaking, natural causes had produced the tremors…
timori di chi si opponeva al naturalismo…
… Some people credited the mechanical philosophy with pushing God further and further into the distance, making him virtually irrelevant to daily life…
***
Nessun trauma nel passaggio tra filosofie naturali e scienza naturalista…
… No single event marks the transition from godly natural philosophy to naturalistic modern science…
Dio veniva gradualmente escluso dallo studio dei fenomeni naturali…
… As we have seen, natural philosophers had often expressed a preference for natural causes, but few, if any, had ruled out appeals to God…. In contrast, virtually all scientists (a term coined in the 183os but not widely used until the late nineteenth century), whether Christians or non-Christians, came by the late nineteenth century to agree that God-talk lay beyond the boundaries of science…
Ma l’avversione per il concetto di Dio è altra cosa. Le sue radici sono nell’illuminismo francese. Importante la figura di Cartesio, ma solo come punto di partenza…
… Although not a materialist-he believed in God and the existence of immaterial souls-Descartes had pushed naturalism to the point of regarding animals as mere machines…
L’uomo robot
… The French physician Julien Offray de La Mettrie (1709-1751), for example, suggested that humans are nothing but "perpendicularly crawling machines," a claim that even the French found sensational…
Buffon
… Buffon called for an emphasis on the regularities of nature and a renunciation of all appeals to the supernatural… A theist, though not a practicing Christian, Buffon acknowledged that the Creator had originally set the planets in motion, but considered the fact of no value to the natural philosopher….
Laplace: “non ho bisogno di Dio”…
… Laplace in 1796 proposed that the planets had been formed from the revolving atmosphere of the primitive sun, which, as it cooled and contracted, had abandoned a succession of Saturn-like rings, which had coalesced to form the planets. On the occasion of a visit in 1802 to the country estate of Napoleon Bonaparte, Laplace entertained his host with an account of his so-called nebular hypothesis. When the French leader asked why he had heard no mention of God, Laplace supposedly uttered the much-quoted words "Sire, I have no need of that hypothesis."… Laplace's thoroughly naturalistic hypothesis, authored by a notorious unbeliever, represented the secularization of natural philosophy at its baldest…
La risposta teistica a Laplace viene dal mondo anglosassone…
… John Pringle Nichol (1804-1859), a minister-turned-astronomer at the University of Glasgow and an avid popularizer of the nebular hypothesis, offered one plausible answer… laws simply designated divine order: "LAW of itself is not substantive or independent power; no causal influence sprung of blind necessity, which carries on events of its own will and energies without command."… Many Christians concluded that these laws had been instituted by God and were evidence of His existence and wisdom… The nebular hypothesis thus strengthened, rather than weakened, the argument from design…
Il modello di Laplace prevedeva solo leggi di natura? Ma chi ne era l’autore? Chi era il geometra?
Dio venne facilmente reintegrato nelle sue funzioni. Cio’ non significa che la dottrina della Provvidenza non subì cambiamenti…
… Christian apologists proved equally adept in modifying the doctrine of divine providence to accommodate the nebular hypothesis. Instead of pointing to the miraculous creation of the world by divine fiat, a "special" providential act, they emphasized God's "general" providence in creating the world by means of natural laws and secondary causes…
Al centro il concetto di “causa secondaria”…
… Daniel Kirkwood (1814-1895), a Presbyterian astronomer who contributed more to the acceptance of the nebular hypothesis in America than anyone else, argued that if God's power is demonstrated in sustaining and governing the world through the agency of secondary causes…
Il metodo scientifico per i teisti…
… In 1829 the English astronomer John Herschel (1792-1871) published A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy (1830), described by one scholar as "the first attempt by an eminent man of science to make the methods of science explicit."… Herschel asserted that sound scientific knowledge derived exclusively from experience… Although this stricture ruled out supernatural causes, Herschel adamantly denied that the pursuit of science fostered unbelief….
L’esperienza rafforza la fede. Dall’esperienza traiamo indizi sull’esistenza di Dio e sulle sue caratteristiche (teologia naturale).
***
Darwin e la spiegazione naturale dell’uomo…
… The person most responsible for naturalizing the origin of species-and thereby making the problem a scientific matter-was Lyell's younger friend Charles Darwin (18og-1882). As early at 1838 Darwin had concluded that attributing the structure of animals to "the will of the Deity" was "no explanation-it has not the character of a physical law & is therefore utterly useless."…
L’obbiettivo di Darwin: annientare il dogma della “creazione separata” degli esseri viventi (non della creazione)…
… In his revolutionary essay On the Origin of Species (1859), Darwin aimed primarily "to overthrow the dogma of separate creations" and extend the domain of natural law throughout the organic world…
Molti credenti dapprima esaltarono Darwin come un semplice estensore del metodo naturalista tanto caro ai cristiani…
… All of these statements welcoming Darwinism as a legitimate extension of natural law into the biological world came from Christian scientists of impeccable religious standing: Rice, a Methodist; Gray, a Presbyterian; Wright, a Congregationalist. Naturalism appealed to them, and to a host of other Christians, in part because it served as a reliable means of discovering God's laws. As the Duke of Argyll, George Douglas Campbell (1823-1910), so passionately argued in his widely read book The Reign of Law (1867), the natural laws of science represented nothing less than manifestations of God's will…
***
Solo a fine ottocento i materialisti attaccano frontalmente la religione usando il sapere scientifico in modo strumentale. E’ più una guerra di potere culturale che di scienza: i materialisti volevano una società secolarizzata
… The relatively smooth passage of naturalism turned nasty during the last third of the nineteenth century, when a noisy group of British scientists and philosophers, led by Huxley and the Irish physicist John Tyndall (182o-i893), began insisting that empirical, naturalistic science provided the only reliable knowledge of nature, humans, and society. Their anticlerical project, aimed at undermining the authority of the established Anglican church and dubbed "scientific naturalism" by Huxley, had little to do with naturalizing the practice of science but a lot to do with creating positions and influence for men such as themselves. They sought, as the historian Frank M. Turner has phrased it, "to expand the influence of scientific ideas for the purpose of secularizing society rather than for the goal of advancing science internally. Secularization was their goal; science, their weapon…
Dichiarazione di guerra
… For centuries men of science had typically gone out of their way to assure the religious of their peaceful intentions. In 1874, however, during his presidential address to the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Tyndall declared war on theology in the name of science…
Lo scientismo nelle scienze sociali di fine ottocento…
… The rise of the social sciences in the late nineteenth century in many ways reflected these imperialistic aims of the scientific naturalists. As moral philosophy fragmented into such new disciplines as psychology and sociology, many social scientists, insecure about their scientific standing, loudly pledged their allegiance not only to the naturalistic methods of science but to the philosophy of scientific naturalism as well…
Dio diventa mera illusione, così come la coscienza e la libertà umana.
***
L’ Intelligent Design segna nel novecento un tentativo di riportare il concetto di Dio nella scienza…
… The roots of the intelligent design argument run deep in the soil of natural theology, but its recent flowering dates from the mid-i98os. The guru of ID, a Berkeley law professor named Phillip E. Johnson (b. 1940)… Johnson's writings inspired a Catholic biochemist at Lehigh University, Michael J. Behe (b. 1952), to speak out on the inadequacy of naturalistic evolution for explaining molecular life. In his iconoclastic book, Darwin's Black Box (1996), Behe maintained that biochemistry had "pushed Darwin's theory to the limit… The partisans of ID hoped to spark "an intellectual revolution" that would rewrite the ground rules of science to allow the inclusion of supernatural explanations of phenomena…
Ma il mainstream della comunità scientifica bocciò sonoramente il progetto…
… Most scientists either ignored it or dismissed it as "the same old creationist bullshit dressed up in new cloths." The British evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins (b. 1941) wrote it off as "a pathetic cop-out of [one's] responsibilities as a scientist."…
Tuttavia, la vicenda suscitò un salutare dibattito nella comunità dei credenti…
… Significantly, the most spirited debate over intelligent design and scientific naturalism took place among conservative Christian scholars. Having long since come to terms with doing science naturalistically, reported the editor of the evangelical journal Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, "most evangelical observers-especially working scientists-[remained] deeply skeptical." Though supportive of a theistic worldview, they balked at being "asked to add `divine agency' to their list of scientific working tools.s42 As the editor's response so graphically illustrates, scientific naturalism of the methodological kind could-and did-coexist with orthodox Christianity. Despite the occasional efforts of unbelievers to use scientific naturalism to construct a world without God, it has retained strong Christian support down to the present… scientific naturalism was largely made in Christendom by pious Christians. Although it possessed the potential to corrode religious beliefs-and sometimes did so-it flourished among Christian scientists who believed that God customarily achieved his ends through natural means….
***
Da queste osservazioni emerge un chiaro messaggio: non collegate secolarizzazione e naturalizzazione…
… nothing characterizes modern science better than its rejection of God… It would be wrong, however, to conclude that the naturalization of science has secularized society generally… As late as the 19gos nearly 40 percent of American scientists continued to believe in a personal God, and, despite the immense cultural authority of naturalistic science…
La naturalizzazione è, tutto sommato, un fenomeno che ha sempre accompagnato il cristianesimo, il quale, anzi, è stata una delle sue forze propulsive. La secolarizzazione è qualcosa di radicato altrove.

venerdì 12 maggio 2017

2 Science without God - Science and Christianity in Pulpit and Pew by Ronald L. Numbers

Read more at location 460
Note: 2@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Edit
Students of nature have not always shunned the supernatural. It took centuries, indeed millennia, for naturalism to dominate the study of nature, and even at the beginning of the twenty-first century, as we shall see, a tiny but vocal group of "theistic scientists" is challengingRead more at location 464
Note: SCIENZA E NATURALISMO: UN CONNUBIO TARDIVO Edit
Historians have employed the word naturalism to designate a broad range of views, from a purely methodological commitment to explaining the workings of nature without recourse to the supernatural, largely devoid of metaphysical implications about God, to a philosophical embrace of materialism, tantamount to atheism.Read more at location 469
Note: IL TERMINE NATURALISMO Edit
When Thomas H. Huxley (1825-1895) coined the term "scientific naturalism" in 1892, he used it to describe a philosophical outlook that shunned the supernatural and adopted empirical science as the only reliable basis of knowledge about the physical, social, and moral worlds.Read more at location 471
Note: IL CONIO DI HUXLEY: UNICO SAPERE AFFIDABILE Edit
Naturalism and Natural Philosophy Read more at location 474
Note: t Edit
Recorded efforts to explain naturally what had previously been attributed to the whimsy of gods date back to the Milesian philosophers of the ancient Greek world, who, six centuries before the birth of Christianity, declared such phenomena as earthquakes, lightning, and thunder to be the result of natural causes.Read more at location 474
Note: PRIMO NATURALISMO DEI FILOS MILESIANI Edit
Hippocratic physicians expanded the realm of the natural to include most diseases, including epilepsy, "the sacred disease."Read more at location 476
Note: IPPOCRATE Edit
The first-century Roman philosopher Lucius Annaeus Seneca, ever suspicious of supernatural causation, calmed the fears of fellow citizens by assuring them that "angry deities" had nothing to do with most meteorological or astronomical events: "Those phenomena have causes of their own .173 Read more at location 477
Note: SENECA Edit
belief in natural causes and the regularity of nature antedated the appearance of Christianity, with its Judaic notion of God as creator and sustainer of the universe.Read more at location 478
Note: ESEMPI PRE CRISTIANI Edit
Christianity could, and sometimes did, encourage the quest for natural explanations. Long before the birth of modern science and the appearance of "scientists" in the nineteenth century, the study of nature in the West was carried out primarily by Christian scholars known as natural philosophers, who typically expressed a preference for natural explanations over divine mysteries.Read more at location 480
Note: LO SPICCATO NATURALISMO DEI CRISTIANI Edit
for instance, Adelard of Bath (ca. io8o-ca. 1150), a much-traveled Englishman familiar with the views of Seneca, instructed his nephew on the virtues of natural explanations: "I will take nothing away from God: for whatever exists is from Him and because of Him.Read more at location 482
Note: UN CASO MEDIEVALE Edit
The University of Paris cleric Jean Buridan (ca. 1295-ca. 1358), described as "perhaps the most brilliant arts master of the Middle Ages," contrasted the philosopher's search for "appropriate natural causes" with the common folk's erroneous habit of attributing unusual astronomical phenomena to the supernatural.Read more at location 487
Note: GIOVANNI DA BURIDANO Edit
Nicole Oresme (ca. 1320-1382), who went on to become a Roman Catholic bishop, admonished that, in discussing various marvels of nature, "there is no reason to take recourse to the heavens,Read more at location 489
Note: ORASMO Edit
The Italian Catholic Galileo Galilei (1564-1642), one of the foremost promoters of the new philosophy, insisted that nature "never violates the terms of the laws imposed upon her." In a widely circulated letter to the Grand Duchess Christina, written in 1615, Galileo, as a good Christian, acknowledged the divine inspiration of both Holy Scripture and the Book of Nature-but insisted that interpreters of the former should have no say in determining the meaning of the latter. Declaring the independence of natural philosophy from theology, he asserted "that in disputes about natural phenomena one must begin not with the authority of scriptural passages but with sensory experience and necessary demonstrations."6Read more at location 493
Note: GALILEO BUON CATTOLICO+++ Edit
the Anglican philosopher and statesman Francis Bacon (1561-1626) was preaching a similar message of independence, warning of "the extreme prejudice which both religion and philosophy hath received and may receive by being commixed together; as that which undoubtedly will make an heretical religion, and an imaginary and fabulous philosophy."Read more at location 496
Note: L ANGLICANO BACONE Edit
When the French Catholic natural philosopher Rene Descartes (1596-165o) boldly constructed a universe of whirling ethereal fluids and speculated how the solar system could have been formed by the action of these vortices operating according to the God-ordained laws of nature, he acquired considerable notoriety for nearly pushing God out of the cosmos altogether.Read more at location 502
Note: IL RISCHIO DI EMARGINARE DIO. CARTESIO... IL PRIMO A CORRERLO Edit
His pious fellow countryman Blaise Pascal (1623-1662) accused Descartes, somewhat unfairly, of trying to dispense with God altogether, according Him only "a flip of the finger in order to set the world in motion."Read more at location 504
Note: L ACCUSA DI GALILEO A PASCAL Edit
Fearing clerical retribution in the years after Galileo's trial, Descartes disingenuously declared his cosmogony to be "absolutely false." sRead more at location 505
Note: +++ PER NN PERDERE LO STIPENDIO CARTESIO RINNEGA GALILEO Edit
The English chemist Robert Boyle (1627-i6gi)-as ardent an advocate of the mechanical philosophy as Descartes yet as pious as Pascal-viewed the discovery of the divinely established laws of nature as a religious act.Read more at location 505
Note: BOYLE... LA RICERCA COME PREGHIERA Edit
No one contributed more to the popular image of the solar system as a giant mechanical device than the University of Cambridge professor of mathematics Isaac Newton (1642-1727), a man of deep, if unorthodox, religious conviction, who unblushingly attributed the perfections of the solar system to "the counsel and dominion of an intelligent and powerful Being."Read more at location 513
Note: LA PROFONDA RELIGIOSITÀ DI NEWTON... L UOME CHE CI HA DESCRITTO L UNIVERSO Edit
the search for natural laws and mechanical explanations became a veritable Christian vocation, especially in Protestant countries, where miraculous signs and wonders were often associated with Catholic superstition.Read more at location 518
Note: MIRACOLI. CATTOLICI E PROTESTNTI Edit
Already by the sixteenth century, supernatural explanations of disease had largely disappeared from medical literature except in discussions of epidemics and insanity, which remained etiological mysteries, and venereal diseases, the wages of sin.Read more at location 522
Note: LA SUPERSTIZIONE IN CAMPO MEDICO. DEBELLATA NEL 500 Edit
Priests and theologians may have placed greater emphasis on supernatural causes and cures, but in general they, too, easily accommodated new medical knowledge by maintaining that God usually effected His will through natural agencies rather than by direct intervention.Read more at location 525
Note: PRETI E MEDICINA: FAVORITA L ADOZIONE Edit
Christians had long regarded smallpox, a frighteningly deadly and disfiguring disease, as God's ultimate scourge to punish sinners and bring them to their knees in contrition. Thus when an epidemic threatened to strike New England in 1721, the governor of Massachusetts called for a day of fasting and repenting of the sins that had "stirred up the Anger of Heaven against us." However, the Puritan Cotton Mather (1663-1728), one of the town of Boston's leading ministerial lights, offered an alternative to repentance-inoculation with an attenuated but live form of smallpox-in hopes of preventing the disease by natural means. Having heard rumors of successful inoculations against smallpox in Africa and the Middle East, Mather, a fellow of the Royal Society of London and a natural philosopher in his own right, proposed that the untested, potentially lethal procedure be tried in Boston. The best trained physician in town, William Douglass (1691-1752), fearing that inoculation would spread rather than prevent the disease and resenting the meddling of ministers in medical matters, urged Mather to rely instead on "the all-wise Providence of God Almighty" and quit trying to thwart God's will. Mather and five other clerics countered that such reasoning would rule out all medical intervention. Cannot pious persons, they asked, give into the method or practice without having their devotion and subjection to the All-wise Providence of God Almighty call'd in question? ... Do we not in the use of all means depend on GOD'S blessing? ...Read more at location 528
Note: IL CASO ESEMPLARE DEL VAIOLO NELLE COLONIE AMERICANE 1720 Edit
The same process occurred in meteorology. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), who as a teenager in Boston had backed Douglass in his quarrel with Mather over smallpox inoculation, found himself on the opposite side of a similar debate a few decades later, after announcing the invention of a device to prevent another of God's judgments on erring humanity: lightning. When a French cleric denounced lightning rods as an inappropriate means of thwarting God's will, the American printer turned scientific celebrity scornfully replied, "He speaks as if he thought it presumption in man to propose guarding himself against the Thunders of Heaven! Surely the Thunder of Heaven is no more supernatural than the Rain, hail or Sunshine of heaven, against the Inconvenience of which we guard by Roofs & Shades without Scruple." Reflective Christians quickly accepted Franklin's logic,Read more at location 540
Note: DINAMICA MOLTO SIMILE NELLA METEOROLOGIA. ANCHE LA RICERCA È UN ATO VOLUTO DA DIO Edit
Reactions to the great earthquakes of 1727 and 1755 further illustrate the inroads of scientific naturalism on popular culture. On the night of October 29, 1727, a violent earthquake shook the northern colonies of America, producing widespread damage to property. Terrified residents, humbled by this apparent display of divine anger, set aside fast days and begged GodRead more at location 546
Note: IDEM TERREMOTI Edit
Thomas Prince (1687-1758), the Puritan pastor of Boston's Old South Church, preached a sermon entitled Earthquakes the Works of God and Tokens of His Just Displeasure.Read more at location 548
Note: c Edit
"Let the Natural Causes of Earthquakes be what the Wise Men of Enquiry please," he wrote. "They and their Causes are still under the government of HIM that is the GOD of Nature."Read more at location 551
Note: c Edit
Professor John Winthrop IV (1714-1779) of Harvard College calmed the timorous with the assurance that, although God bore ultimate responsibility for the shaking, natural causes had produced the tremors.Read more at location 554
Note: c Edit
Some people credited the mechanical philosophy with pushing God further and further into the distance, making him virtually irrelevant to daily life.Read more at location 556
Note: LA PAURA DI CHI SI OPPONEVA AL NATURALISMO Edit
The Decline of Natural Philosophy and the Beginnings of Modern Science Read more at location 562
Note: t Edit
No single event marks the transition from godly natural philosophy to naturalistic modern science,Read more at location 562
Note: NESSUN TRAUMA TRA NATURALUSMO E SCIENZA Edit
As we have seen, natural philosophers had often expressed a preference for natural causes, but few, if any, had ruled out appeals to God.Read more at location 564
Note: L APPELLO A DIO DEGLI SCIENZIATI Edit
In contrast, virtually all scientists (a term coined in the 183os but not widely used until the late nineteenth century), whether Christians or non-Christians, came by the late nineteenth century to agree that God-talk lay beyond the boundaries of science.17 Read more at location 565
Note: DOPO:DIO ESCLUSO DALLO STUDIO DELLA SCIENZA Edit
The roots of secular science can be traced most clearly to Enlightenment France,Read more at location 566
Although not a materialist-he believed in God and the existence of immaterial souls-Descartes had pushed naturalism to the point of regarding animals as mere machines.Read more at location 566
Note: IMPORTANTE LA FIGURA DI DESCARTES Edit
The French physician Julien Offray de La Mettrie (1709-1751), for example, suggested that humans are nothing but "perpendicularly crawling machines," a claim that even the French found sensational.Read more at location 568
Note: LE METRIE E L UOMO ROBOT Edit
Buffon called for an emphasis on the regularities of nature and a renunciation of all appeals to the supernatural.Read more at location 573
Note: BUFFON Edit
A theist, though not a practicing Christian, Buffon acknowledged that the Creator had originally set the planets in motion, but considered the fact of no value to the natural philosopher.Read more at location 576
Note: c Edit
Laplace in 1796 proposed that the planets had been formed from the revolving atmosphere of the primitive sun, which, as it cooled and contracted, had abandoned a succession of Saturn-like rings, which had coalesced to form the planets. On the occasion of a visit in 1802 to the country estate of Napoleon Bonaparte, Laplace entertained his host with an account of his so-called nebular hypothesis. When the French leader asked why he had heard no mention of God, Laplace supposedly uttered the much-quoted words "Sire, I have no need of that hypothesis."Read more at location 581
Note: LAPLACE Edit
Laplace's thoroughly naturalistic hypothesis, authored by a notorious unbeliever, represented the secularization of natural philosophy at its baldest.Read more at location 588
Note: c Edit
John Pringle Nichol (1804-1859), a minister-turned-astronomer at the University of Glasgow and an avid popularizer of the nebular hypothesis, offered one plausible answer.Read more at location 594
Note: LA RISPOSTA TEISTICA A LAPLACE VIENE DAL MONDO ANGLOSASSONE Edit
laws simply designated divine order: "LAW of itself is not substantive or independent power; no causal influence sprung of blind necessity, which carries on events of its own will and energies without command."22 Read more at location 596
Note: c Edit
Many Christians concluded that these laws had been instituted by God and were evidence of His existence and wisdom.Read more at location 599
Note: c Edit
The nebular hypothesis thus strengthened, rather than weakened, the argument from design,Read more at location 601
Note: c Edit
Christian apologists proved equally adept in modifying the doctrine of divine providence to accommodate the nebular hypothesis. Instead of pointing to the miraculous creation of the world by divine fiat, a "special" providential act, they emphasized God's "general" providence in creating the world by means of natural laws and secondary causes.Read more at location 602
Note: MODIFICATA LA DOTTRINA DELLA PROVVISENZA Edit
Daniel Kirkwood (1814-1895), a Presbyterian astronomer who contributed more to the acceptance of the nebular hypothesis in America than anyone else, argued that if God's power is demonstrated in sustaining and governing the world through the agency of secondary causes,Read more at location 605
Note: CAUSA SECONDARIA AL CENTRO Edit
God's reliance on secondary causesRead more at location 607
In 1829 the English astronomer John Herschel (1792-1871) published A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy (1830), described by one scholar as "the first attempt by an eminent man of science to make the methods of science explicit."Read more at location 617
Note: TENTATIVO DI ESPLICITARE IL METODO DELLA SC Edit
Herschel asserted that sound scientific knowledge derived exclusively from experience,Read more at location 619
Note: c Edit
Although this stricture ruled out supernatural causes, Herschel adamantly denied that the pursuit of science fostered unbelief.Read more at location 621
Note: HERSHEL: CONCILIABILITÀ CON LA FEDE CHE LA NS ESPER RAFFORZA Edit
The person most responsible for naturalizing the origin of species-and thereby making the problem a scientific matter-was Lyell's younger friend Charles Darwin (18og-1882). As early at 1838 Darwin had concluded that attributing the structure of animals to "the will of the Deity" was "no explanation-it has not the character of a physical law & is therefore utterly useless."Read more at location 640
Note: DARWIN E LA SPIEGAZ NATURALE DELL UOMO Edit
In his revolutionary essay On the Origin of Species (1859), Darwin aimed primarily "to overthrow the dogma of separate creations" and extend the domain of natural law throughout the organic world.Read more at location 650
Note: DARWIN CONTRO IL DOGMA DELLA CREAZ SEPARATA Edit
All of these statements welcoming Darwinism as a legitimate extension of natural law into the biological world came from Christian scientists of impeccable religious standing: Rice, a Methodist; Gray, a Presbyterian; Wright, a Congregationalist. Naturalism appealed to them, and to a host of other Christians, in part because it served as a reliable means of discovering God's laws. As the Duke of Argyll, George Douglas Campbell (1823-1910), so passionately argued in his widely read book The Reign of Law (1867), the natural laws of science represented nothing less than manifestations of God's will.Read more at location 662
Note: MOLTI CRISTIANI ESALTARONO DARWIN COME UN SEMPLICE ESTENSORE AL MONDO ORGANICO DI QUEL NATURALISMO CRISTIANO Edit
The relatively smooth passage of naturalism turned nasty during the last third of the nineteenth century, when a noisy group of British scientists and philosophers, led by Huxley and the Irish physicist John Tyndall (182o-i893), began insisting that empirical, naturalistic science provided the only reliable knowledge of nature, humans, and society. Their anticlerical project, aimed at undermining the authority of the established Anglican church and dubbed "scientific naturalism" by Huxley, had little to do with naturalizing the practice of science but a lot to do with creating positions and influence for men such as themselves. They sought, as the historian Frank M. Turner has phrased it, "to expand the influence of scientific ideas for the purpose of secularizing society rather than for the goal of advancing science internally. Secularization was their goal; science, their weapon.s36 Read more at location 672
Note: FINE OTTOCENTO... SOLO A QS PUNTO I MATERIALISTI ATTACCANO Edit
Note: MA È UNA GUERRA DI POTERE. QUELLA SCIENTIF NN C È MAI STATA Edit
Note: LA SC STEUMENTALIZZATA Edit
For centuries men of science had typically gone out of their way to assure the religious of their peaceful intentions. In 1874, however, during his presidential address to the British Association for the Advancement of Science, Tyndall declared war on theology in the name of science.Read more at location 676
Note: DICH DI GUETRA Edit
The rise of the social sciences in the late nineteenth century in many ways reflected these imperialistic aims of the scientific naturalists. As moral philosophy fragmented into such new disciplines as psychology and sociology, many social scientists, insecure about their scientific standing, loudly pledged their allegiance not only to the naturalistic methods of science but to the philosophy of scientific naturalism as well.Read more at location 684
Note: LO SCIENTISMO NELLE SCIENZE SOCIALI...FINE OTTOCENTO Edit
God faded into an illusion,Read more at location 688
"'epiphenomenal,' a merely incidentalRead more at location 689
Reclaiming Science in the Name of God Read more at location 690
Note: t Edit
The roots of the intelligent design argument run deep in the soil of natural theology, but its recent flowering dates from the mid-i98os. The guru of ID, a Berkeley law professor named Phillip E. Johnson (b. 1940),Read more at location 696
Note: INTELLUGENT DESIGN. IL ROTORNO Edit
Johnson's writings inspired a Catholic biochemist at Lehigh University, Michael J. Behe (b. 1952), to speak out on the inadequacy of naturalistic evolution for explaining molecular life. In his iconoclastic book, Darwin's Black Box (1996), Behe maintained that biochemistry had "pushed Darwin's theory to the limit ...Read more at location 699
Note: c Edit
The partisans of ID hoped to spark "an intellectual revolution" that would rewrite the ground rules of science to allow the inclusion of supernatural explanations of phenomena.Read more at location 704
Note: c Edit
Most scientists either ignored it or dismissed it as "the same old creationist bullshit dressed up in new cloths." The British evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins (b. 1941) wrote it off as "a pathetic cop-out of [one's] responsibilities as a scientist."Read more at location 711
Note: LA BOCCIATURA DEL MAINSTREAM Edit
Significantly, the most spirited debate over intelligent design and scientific naturalism took place among conservative Christian scholars. Having long since come to terms with doing science naturalistically, reported the editor of the evangelical journal Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, "most evangelical observers-especially working scientists-[remained] deeply skeptical." Though supportive of a theistic worldview, they balked at being "asked to add `divine agency' to their list of scientific working tools.s42 As the editor's response so graphically illustrates, scientific naturalism of the methodological kind could-and did-coexist with orthodox Christianity. Despite the occasional efforts of unbelievers to use scientific naturalism to construct a world without God, it has retained strong Christian support down to the present.Read more at location 712
Note: LA VICENDA E IL SALUTARE DIBATTITO SUSCITATO NELLA COMUNITÀ DEI CREDENTI Edit
scientific naturalism was largely made in Christendom by pious Christians. Although it possessed the potential to corrode religious beliefs-and sometimes did so-it flourished among Christian scientists who believed that God customarily achieved his ends through natural means.43Read more at location 716
Note: c Edit
Note: c Edit
nothing characterizes modern science better than its rejection of GodRead more at location 718
Note: L ERRORE: LEGARE NATURALIZZ E SECOLARIZZ Edit
It would be wrong, however, to conclude that the naturalization of science has secularized society generally.Read more at location 718
Note: c Edit
As late as the 19gos nearly 40 percent of American scientists continued to believe in a personal God, and, despite the immense cultural authority of naturalistic science,Read more at location 719
Note: 40% Edit