Come mai in politica girano così pochi soldi?
Everyone always talks about how much money there is in politics. This is the wrong framing. The right framing is Ansolabehere et al’s: why is there so little money in politics? But Ansolabehe…
Too Much Dark Money In Almonds
Posted
Citation (APA): Posted. (2019). Too Much Dark Money In Almonds [Kindle Android version]. Retrieved from Amazon.com
Parte introduttiva
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 2
Too Much Dark Money In Almonds
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 5
Everyone always talks about how much money there is in politics. This is the wrong framing. The right framing is Ansolabehere et al’s: why is there so little money in politics?
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 7
during the 2018 election, candidates, parties, PACs, and outsiders combined spent about $ 5 billion– $ 2.5 billion on Democrats, $ 2 billion on Republicans, and $ 0.5 billion on third parties.
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 9
The US almond industry earns $ 12 billion per year. Americans spent about 2.5x as much on almonds as on candidates last year.
Nota - Posizione 10
Ccccc
Nota - Posizione 10
Ccccc
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 11
But also, what about lobbying? Open Secrets reports $ 3.5 billion in lobbying spending in 2018.
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 21
In fact, we’re still less than Elon Musk’s personal fortune; Musk could personally fund the entire US political ecosystem on both sides for a whole two-year election cycle.
Nota - Posizione 22
LA RICCHEZZA CHE CIRCOLA IN POLITICA
Nota - Posizione 22
LA RICCHEZZA CHE CIRCOLA IN POLITICA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 25
The Washington Post was sold for $ 250 million in 2013
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 26
These properties seem to be priced entirely as cash cows– based on their ability to make money through subscriptions or ads. The extra value of using them for political influence seems to be priced around zero,
Nota - Posizione 27
Cccc
Nota - Posizione 27
Cccc
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 28
Or: Jacobin spends a lot of time advocating socialism. The Economist spends a lot of time advocating liberalism. First Things spends a lot of time advocating conservatism. They all have one thing in common: paywalls. How could this be efficient?
Nota - Posizione 30
Cccccc
Nota - Posizione 30
Cccccc
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 33
Tumblr.com, which recently sold for $ 3 million, ie the cost of a medium-sized house in San Francisco. Tumblr has 400 million monthly visitors, and at least tens of millions of active users. These people talk politics all the time,
Nota - Posizione 35
UN CASO ESTREMO
Nota - Posizione 35
UN CASO ESTREMO
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 35
Nobody thinks that one of the central political discussion platforms of the far-left is worth more than $ 3 million? Nobody on the right wants to shut it down?
Nota - Posizione 36
Ccccc
Nota - Posizione 36
Ccccc
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 41
we should expect ordinary people to donate more to politics. A lot of the ordinary people I know care a lot about politics.
Nota - Posizione 42
STRANEZZE 1
Nota - Posizione 42
STRANEZZE 1
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 49
we should expect the rich to donate more to politics. Many politicians want to tax billionaires; billionaires presumably want to prevent that from happening.
Nota - Posizione 50
2
Nota - Posizione 50
2
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 52
we should expect big corporations to donate more to politics.
Nota - Posizione 53
3
Nota - Posizione 53
3
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 54
The government regulates corporations, so having friendly politicians in power can mean life or death for entire industries.
Nota - Posizione 54
Ccccccc
Nota - Posizione 54
Ccccccc
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 64
money neither makes a candidate much more likely to win, nor buys much influence
Nota - Posizione 65
MESSO IN EVIDENZA DA MOLTI
Nota - Posizione 65
MESSO IN EVIDENZA DA MOLTI
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 66
Most research (plus the 2016 results) confirms that money has little effect on victory,
Nota - Posizione 67
Ccc
Nota - Posizione 67
Ccc
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 71
If everyone who cared about homelessness donated $ 100 to the problem, homelessness would be solved. Nobody does this, because they know that nobody else is going to do it,
Nota - Posizione 72
CI SONO POI PROBLEMI DI COORDINAMENTO
Nota - Posizione 72
CI SONO POI PROBLEMI DI COORDINAMENTO
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 75
No single greedy corporation wants to pony up the money to change the laws to favor greedy corporations all on its own, while its competitors lie back and free-ride on its hard work.
Nota - Posizione 76
Cccc
Nota - Posizione 76
Cccc
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 78
In this model, the difference between politics and almonds is that if you spend $ 2 on almonds, you get $ 2 worth of almonds.
Nota - Posizione 79
Ccccc
Nota - Posizione 79
Ccccc
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 81
the same factors that keep money out of politics keep it out of charity too.
Nota - Posizione 81
Ccccccc
Nota - Posizione 81
Ccccccc
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 86
This is one reason I’m so gung ho about people pledging to donate 10% of their income to charity.
Nota - Posizione 87
PROMETTERE PUBBLICAMENTE X COORDINARE
Nota - Posizione 87
PROMETTERE PUBBLICAMENTE X COORDINARE
