Il "principio di Pietro" sembrerebbe confermato: nelle multinazionali i manager competenti vengono promossi finché non raggiungono una posizione in cui si dimostrano mediocri. L'equilibrio si raggiunge quando tutte le posizioni sono occupate da persone incompetenti.
Visualizzazione post con etichetta #hanson inefficienza. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta #hanson inefficienza. Mostra tutti i post
lunedì 26 febbraio 2018
martedì 1 agosto 2017
Il mito dell’efficienza nell’impresa privata
Il mito dell’efficienza nell’impresa privata
It Takes More Than Performance – Power: Why Some People Have It—and Others Don’t – Jeffrey Pfeffer
***
Trigger warning: – performance e promozioni – performance e paga – performance e fortuna – le performance sono infinite – ostentare – la figlia del capo – il leccaculo – politica e performance
1 It Takes More Than Performance
Note:1@@@@@@@@@@
Note:1@@@@@@@@@@
Yellow highlight | Page: 19
If you think it’s just in the domain of public education where success fails to guarantee job security, think again.
Note:SCUOLA E ANTIMERITOCRAZIA
Note:SCUOLA E ANTIMERITOCRAZIA
Yellow highlight | Page: 20
And it’s not just in the public sector where there is a weak link between job performance and career outcomes.
Note:STATALI E MULTINAZIONALI
Note:STATALI E MULTINAZIONALI
Yellow highlight | Page: 20
And it’s not just at the highest levels or just in the United States where performance doesn’t guarantee success.
Note:NON SOLO IN VETTA
Note:NON SOLO IN VETTA
Yellow highlight | Page: 21
Not only doesn’t good performance guarantee you will maintain a position of power, poor performance doesn’t mean you will necessarily lose your job.
Note:LA PERFORMANCE NON E' TUTTO...ANZI
Note:LA PERFORMANCE NON E' TUTTO...ANZI
Yellow highlight | Page: 21
One of the biggest mistakes people make is thinking that good performance—job accomplishments—is sufficient to acquire power and avoid organizational difficulties. Consequently, people leave too much to chance and fail to effectively manage their careers.
Note:AFFIDARSI ALLA PERFORMANCE E' AFFIDARSI ALLA FORTUNA
Note:AFFIDARSI ALLA PERFORMANCE E' AFFIDARSI ALLA FORTUNA
Yellow highlight | Page: 22
THE WEAK LINK BETWEEN PERFORMANCE AND JOB OUTCOMES
Note:TTTTTTT
Note:TTTTTTT
Yellow highlight | Page: 22
More than 20 years ago social psychologist David Schoorman studied the performance appraisal ratings obtained by 354 clerical employees working in a public sector organization.
Note:SHOORMAN
Note:SHOORMAN
Yellow highlight | Page: 23
guess, supervisors who were actively involved in hiring people whom they favored rated those subordinates more highly on performance appraisals than they did those employees they inherited or the ones they did not initially support.
Note:FAVORITISMI A GO GO
Note:FAVORITISMI A GO GO
Yellow highlight | Page: 23
In 1980, economists James Medoff and Katherine Abraham observed that salaries in companies were more strongly related to age and organizational tenure than they were to job performance.6 Ensuing research has confirmed and extended their findings,
Note:MEDOFF
Note:MEDOFF
Yellow highlight | Page: 24
Not only may outstanding job performance not guarantee you a promotion, it can even hurt.
Note:L'EFFICIENZA CHE DANNEGGIA
Note:L'EFFICIENZA CHE DANNEGGIA
Yellow highlight | Page: 24
“I’m not going to let you go because you are too good in the job you are doing for me.”
Note:RISPOSTA STANDARD AI CAPACI CHE CHIEDONO POSTI DI RESPONSABILITA'
Note:RISPOSTA STANDARD AI CAPACI CHE CHIEDONO POSTI DI RESPONSABILITA'
Yellow highlight | Page: 25
Most studies of job tenure examine CEOs, because CEOs are highly visible and that’s the position for which there is the best data. Performance does affect job tenure and its obverse, getting fired, but again the effects are small.
Note:CEO... I PIÙ STUDIATI
Note:CEO... I PIÙ STUDIATI
Yellow highlight | Page: 25
So great job performance by itself is insufficient and may not even be necessary for getting and holding positions of power.
Note:SUFFICIENTE E NECESSARIO
Note:SUFFICIENTE E NECESSARIO
Yellow highlight | Page: 26
GET NOTICED
Note:TTTTTT
Note:TTTTTT
Yellow highlight | Page: 26
People in power are busy with their own agendas and jobs. Such people, including those higher up in your own organization, probably aren’t paying that much attention to you and what you are doing.
Note:L'ATTENZIONE DEL CAPO COME RISORSA SCARSA
Note:L'ATTENZIONE DEL CAPO COME RISORSA SCARSA
Yellow highlight | Page: 26
The importance of standing out contradicts much conventional wisdom. There is a common saying that I first heard in Japan but since have heard in Western Europe as well: the nail that sticks up gets hammered down.
Note:OSTENTARE PAGA
Note:OSTENTARE PAGA
Yellow highlight | Page: 27
In advertising, one of the most prominent measures of effectiveness is ad recall—not taste, logic, or artistry—simply, do you remember the ad and the product?
Note:MEMORABILE
Note:MEMORABILE
Yellow highlight | Page: 27
people, other things being equal, prefer and choose what is familiar to them—what they have seen or experienced before.
Note:ROBERT ZAJONIC
Note:ROBERT ZAJONIC
Yellow highlight | Page: 27
The simple fact is that people like what they remember—
Note:CCCCC
Note:CCCCC
Yellow highlight | Page: 27
An Italian executive who has worked in numerous large multinational corporations and has risen quickly through the ranks is an outspoken and provocative individual. Consequently, he sometimes irritates people. But as another manager told me, “decades from now I will remember him, while I will have forgotten most of his contemporaries.”
Note:ESSERE PROVOCATORI
Note:ESSERE PROVOCATORI
Yellow highlight | Page: 28
DEFINE THE DIMENSIONS OF PERFORMANCE
Note:TTTTTT
Note:TTTTTT
Yellow highlight | Page: 28
Tina Brown’s performance as a magazine editor depends on what criteria you choose to evaluate her work. She presided over great growth in advertising revenue and circulation. She garnered press attention for herself and the magazines. But there was no economic profit.
Note:MR.PROFITTO E I SUOI FRATELLI
Note:MR.PROFITTO E I SUOI FRATELLI
Yellow highlight | Page: 29
There are limits to what you can do to affect the criteria used to judge your work. But you can highlight those dimensions of job performance that favor you—and work against your competition.
Note:ESALTATE I VOSTRI PUNTI FORTI
Note:ESALTATE I VOSTRI PUNTI FORTI
Yellow highlight | Page: 30
REMEMBER WHAT MATTERS TO YOUR BOSS
Note:TTTTTT
Note:TTTTTT
Yellow highlight | Page: 30
One of the reasons that performance matters less than people expect is that performance has many dimensions. Furthermore, what matters to your boss may not be the same things that you think are important. Jamie Dimon lost his job at Citigroup when he got into a tussle with Sandy Weill’s daughter, who also worked for the company. Weill cared about his family, not just about the financial results of Citigroup.
Note:LA FIGLIA DEL CAPO
Note:LA FIGLIA DEL CAPO
Yellow highlight | Page: 30
Many people believe that they know what their bosses care about. But unless they are mind readers, that’s probably a risky assumption. It is much more effective for you to ask those in power, on a regular basis, what aspects of the job they think are the most crucial and how they see what you ought to be doing.
Note:CHIEDERE
Note:CHIEDERE
Yellow highlight | Page: 31
MAKE OTHERS FEEL BETTER ABOUT THEMSELVES
Note:TTTTTTTT
Note:TTTTTTTT
Yellow highlight | Page: 31
You can almost always tell at least one aspect of your job performance that will be crucial: do you, in how you conduct yourself, what you talk about, and what you accomplish, make those in power feel better about themselves?
Note:FAR STAR BENE GLI ALTRI
Note:FAR STAR BENE GLI ALTRI
Yellow highlight | Page: 31
And because people like themselves, people prefer others who are similar, because what is more self-enhancing than to choose someone who reminds you of—you! A large literature documents the importance of similarity in predicting interpersonal attraction.
Note:CONFORMISMO
Note:CONFORMISMO
Yellow highlight | Page: 31
because people like those who are similar to them, they also favor their own groups and disfavor competitive groups—an effect called ingroup bias and outgroup derogation18—and also prefer people from their own social categories, for instance, of similar race and socioeconomic background. One sure way to make your boss feel worse is to criticize that individual, and this criticism is going to be particularly sensitive if it concerns an issue that the boss feels is important and where there is some inherent insecurity.
Note:NON CRITICARE IL GRUPPO
Note:NON CRITICARE IL GRUPPO
Yellow highlight | Page: 32
The lesson: worry about the relationship you have with your boss at least as much as you worry about your job performance.
Note:LE RELAZIONI CONTANO
Note:LE RELAZIONI CONTANO
Yellow highlight | Page: 33
One of the best ways to make those in power feel better about themselves is to flatter them. The research literature shows how effective flattery is as a strategy to gain influence.
Note:LECCARE IL CULO PAGA
Note:LECCARE IL CULO PAGA
Yellow highlight | Page: 34
Most people underestimate the effectiveness of flattery and therefore underutilize it.
Note:METODO SOTTOVALUTATO
Note:METODO SOTTOVALUTATO
Yellow highlight | Page: 34
There is simply no question that the desire to believe that flattery is at once sincere and accurate will, in most instances, leave us susceptible to being flattered and, as a consequence, under the influence of the flatterer.
Note:DIFFICILE CHE IL BOSS PENSI ALL'ADULATORE COME A PERSONA INSINCERA
Note:DIFFICILE CHE IL BOSS PENSI ALL'ADULATORE COME A PERSONA INSINCERA
Yellow highlight | Page: 35
The people responsible for your success are those above you, with the power to either promote you or to block your rise up the organization chart.
Note:IL TUO SUCCESSO DIPENDE DAL TUO CAPO
Note:IL TUO SUCCESSO DIPENDE DAL TUO CAPO
Yellow highlight | Page: 35
It is performance, coupled with political skill, that will help you rise through the ranks. Performance by itself is seldom sufficient, and in some instances, may not even be necessary.
POLITICA+EFFICIENZA
POLITICA+EFFICIENZA
lunedì 12 ottobre 2015
Firm Inefficiency di Robin Hanson
#hanson inefficienza
Firm Inefficiency di Robin Hanson
Firm Inefficiency di Robin Hanson
- le grandi imprese sono inefficienti xchè 2 ipotesi: 1 bias 2 costi d agenzia
- ricorda: c'è una concorrenza coi gruppi esterni ma anche una concorrenza tra gruppi di potere interni
- 1 come mai la produttività aumenta quando entra un competitore?
- 2 i fannulloni sono noti ma vengono fatti fuori solo se c è un pretesto più ampio
- 3 preferenza verso i processi elaborati all interno piuttosto che importati dall esterno
- 4 yes man: ce n' è in abbondanza
- 5 opa ostili: la legislazione che le limita protegge i manager
- 6 paghe dei ceo: sembrano svincolate da una logica efficientista
- 7 un fiume di briefing inutili
- i meeting hanno spesso lo scopo di ostentare accordo su scelte giá prese che quello di prendere decisioni
- 8 valutazione distorta dei dipendenti: ogni boss ha i suoi favoriti che coincidono con quelli che ha assunto xsonalmente
- 9 troppa importanza ai titoli di studio
- 10 scarsa propensione agli esperimenti
- 11 scarsa propensione a controllare e documentare predizioni ed esiti effettivi. eppure nei meeting la gente nn fa altro che prevedere il futuro
- 12 il boss non premia chi sente migliore di sè
- 13 l info nn è trasparente: che bisogno c è di limitare gli accessi? solo un modo di preservare il potere
- 14 una valanga di consulenze inutili al solo scopo di pararsi le spalle
- le consulenze sono spesso adottate x incrementare il prestigio dell organizzazione piuttosto che l efficienza
- 15 poco telelavoro farebbe risparmiare molto
- 18 spesso i manager di potere espongono vaghe filosofie per ottenere alleati senza imporre costi a nessuno...
continua
Iscriviti a:
Post (Atom)