Visualizzazione post con etichetta cellulare smartphone. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta cellulare smartphone. Mostra tutti i post

venerdì 3 marzo 2023

 https://feedly.com/i/entry/Od/Z0OrlTBzSrJtcae1t5qtueOtvOco3UFNx6gD9Pd4=_186a3d380ec:54a206:eb50cb6c

giovedì 2 marzo 2023

 https://feedly.com/i/entry/PSDumfOpVGHNUIZxb8rsZHy1HXbbusmffJdbmCQIiUo=_1869fd0457d:21f6c1:eb50cb6c

mercoledì 11 settembre 2019

HL In defense of screen time + BAMBINI DAVANTI ALLO SMARTPHONE: UN DEJA VU

https://feedly.com/i/entry//cnXVr/5HNe2pDqTI3udBeVx4AbJSW9TNhacAl8h6Dc=_16d1c3558a0:3da8e21:27d622fb

BAMBINI DAVANTI ALLO SMARTPHONE: UN DEJA VU
Pensa a tuo figlio come a un ragazzino sempre alle prese con una realtà alternativa. Qualcosa dove non valgono le normali regole della vita, qualcosa in cui prevale l'immaginazione. Tu ti preoccupi perché questa realtà alternativa è così avvincente che il bambino non riesce a staccare. Perché non vuole uscire più di casa e sembra avere tutto cio' di cui ha bisogno nella sua cameretta. La vita all'aperto non sembra avere attrattive di sorta per lui. Annusi il pericolo e pensi sempre: "devo fare qualcosa, non riesce più a distinguere la finzione dalla realtà!".
Calma, quello che stai vivendo è una condizione ricorrente nella storia. Vengono subito in mente le donne che leggevano i romanzi alla fine del 1800, figurine eternate da Gustave Flaubert in "Madame Bovary".
Avere dei precedenti aiuta a capire il problema e le sue soluzioni.
BJORNJEFFERY.COM
As a part of Techfestival 2019 in Copenhagen, Denmark, I was asked to present my thoughts on kids, screens, and technology. In order to get the nuances right, I wrote a speech. You can read it belo…

In defense of screen time
Bj�rn Jeffery
Citation (APA): Jeffery, B. (2019). In defense of screen time [Kindle Android version]. Retrieved from Amazon.com

Parte introduttiva
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 2
In defense of screen time By Björn Jeffery•
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 5
Imagine young people longing for an alternate reality. One where regular rules of life do not apply, and one where your imagination prevails. Their parents worry, because this alternate reality is so compelling that these young people sometimes don’t want to leave it. They don’t want to go outside– they have all they need from their new world. Some of them never want to go back to the realities of everyday life.
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 9
in danger of not being able to differentiate between fiction and life”.
Nota - Posizione 10
Cccccc
Nota - Posizione 10
Cccccc
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 10
Does this sound familiar? I am of course talking about women reading fictional books, in the late 1800s. In particular, reading the novel “Madame Bovary”
Nota - Posizione 11
Ccccccc
Nota - Posizione 11
Ccccccc
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 14
young women as particularly susceptible to the fantasies they find in novels
Nota - Posizione 14
FLAUBERT
Nota - Posizione 14
FLAUBERT
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 17
Concerns about our young are in fact very common, and have been so for hundreds of years.
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 18
we can also benefit from learning what the actual outcomes of many of these changes have been.
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 21
How can we talk about screen time without knowing what is taking place on the screen?
Nota - Posizione 21
Ttttttttt
Nota - Posizione 21
Ttttttttt
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 22
example of books as it represents a media format that is not only accepted, but almost universally seen as preferable. Books are great.
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 24
Is it good that kids read books? Generally speaking, yes,
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 25
any type of book? Not necessarily. You wouldn’t choose “50 Shades of Grey” as a bedtime
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 27
we can conclude that books themselves are neither good nor bad. They can be both. It depends on the context, the reader, the intent– and of course it depends on the book itself.
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 30
I’m sure you’ve heard phrases like “No screen time before 2”.
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 32
how can we talk about screen time without knowing what is taking place on the screen?
Nota - Posizione 32
Tttttt
Nota - Posizione 32
Tttttt
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 32
Empathy
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 37
Amy Orben and Andrew Przybylski,
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 42
if social media makes you happy or sad.
Nota - Posizione 42
PRIMA QUESTIONE
Nota - Posizione 42
PRIMA QUESTIONE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 44
99.6% of the variability in adolescent girls’ satisfaction with life had nothing to do with how much they used social media.
Nota - Posizione 45
FELICITÀ
Nota - Posizione 45
FELICITÀ
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 46
It is undoubtedly tough being an adolescent. But this was true long before there were any screens.
Nota - Posizione 47
Ccccccc
Nota - Posizione 47
Ccccccc
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 48
Myopia– being nearsighted– has almost doubled from 1971 and 2008 which in turn can increase risks of vision
Nota - Posizione 49
UN PROBLEMA
Nota - Posizione 49
UN PROBLEMA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 50
We know that nearsightedness has increased, but we do not know why.
Nota - Posizione 50
Cccccccc
Nota - Posizione 50
Cccccccc
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 55
It is easier to listen to an alarmist TV psychologist that– very conveniently– is trying to sell you a book on the topic of screen time.
Nota - Posizione 56
I GENITORI OSTAGGIO...NN SONO SCIENZIATI
Nota - Posizione 56
I GENITORI OSTAGGIO...NN SONO SCIENZIATI
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 57
From a strict harm reduction perspective, it would be best to make kids wear helmets and protective gear at all times. But it is not practical.
Nota - Posizione 57
LA PRUDENZA? È POCO.PRATICA
Nota - Posizione 57
LA PRUDENZA? È POCO.PRATICA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 58
By withholding screens from your kids you may be reducing a hypothetical risk, but you are also withholding them from opportunity and potential.
Nota - Posizione 59
I RISCHI
Nota - Posizione 59
I RISCHI
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 60
Who should we listen to?
Nota - Posizione 60
Ttttttttt
Nota - Posizione 60
Ttttttttt
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 61
AAP– American Academy of Pediatrics
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 62
they specifically call out “high-quality programming/ apps” which moves the conversation from looking at the screen itself, towards looking at the activity which is taking place.
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 64
say the following: “Co-view or co-play with your children, and find other activities to do together that are healthy for the body and mind
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 71
In 1938, St Petersburg Times
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 72
“Withdraw all encouragement relating to the reading of books. Reduce the number available. Act so as to make reading inconvenient except for the set time”.
Nota - Posizione 73
1938
Nota - Posizione 73
1938
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 75
Their concern is the amount of reading, not the reading itself. It is becoming too much,
Nota - Posizione 76
Cccccccc
Nota - Posizione 76
Cccccccc
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 76
It isn’t healthy to only read novels all day.
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 81
discouraging reading in 1938 may not have been a great piece of advice.
Nota - Posizione 82
TUTTAVIA
Nota - Posizione 82
TUTTAVIA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 83
Where will this thing people call “screen time” take our kids in the future?
Nota - Posizione 84
Tttttttt
Nota - Posizione 84
Tttttttt
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 85
Fortnite looks like a game where people shoot each other and do weird dances to celebrate it. But Fortnite is also an online social club where leadership and teamwork develop.
Nota - Posizione 86
DOPPIA FACCIA
Nota - Posizione 86
DOPPIA FACCIA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 87
When was the last time you collaborated with a global group of people, in real-time, towards a common goal?
Nota - Posizione 87
Cccccc
Nota - Posizione 87
Cccccc
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 89
Minecraft is similar.
Nota - Posizione 92
Ttttttt
Nota - Posizione 92
Ttttttt
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 92
Togetherness
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 92
For me, I think the future of screen time is togetherness.
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 92
global collaboration is seamless and enriching.
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 94
Four suggestions
Nota - Posizione 94
Tttttt
Nota - Posizione 94
Tttttt
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 97
1. What matters is what is on the screen, not the screen itself.
Nota - Posizione 97
1
Nota - Posizione 97
1
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 100
2. Consider the context
Nota - Posizione 100
2
Nota - Posizione 100
2
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 100
How are your kids playing? Are they doing it together with others– siblings, friends, online friends?
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 104
3. Encourage variety
Nota - Posizione 104
3
Nota - Posizione 104
3
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 107
4. Treat the screen like you would anything else
Nota - Posizione 107
4
Nota - Posizione 107
4
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 107
When I was the CEO of Toca Boca and tried to explain my job to people, almost everyone said “ah, you mean educational apps”. It was precluded that if you make apps for children, their primary purpose must be education.
Nota - Posizione 109
Ccccccc
Nota - Posizione 109
Ccccccc
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 110
What if all food you served your kids had to have a specific nutritional formula?
Nota - Posizione 110
Cccccc
Nota - Posizione 110
Cccccc
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 112
Childhood is more than just education. But if you want apps to be educational, you can find plenty that are really great.
Nota - Posizione 112
Ccccccc
Nota - Posizione 112
Ccccccc
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 113
The screen is just like life in general– don’t treat it any differently.
Nota - Posizione 114
Ccccccc
Nota - Posizione 114
Ccccccc

sabato 26 agosto 2017

ch 4 Lo smartphone e la salute mentale dei giovani

Chapter 4 Insecure: The New Mental Health Crisis - iGen: Why Today's Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy--and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood--and What That Means for the Rest of Us
Jean M. Twenge
Note:4@@@@@@

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,352
unexplainable, occasional sadness
Note:TRISTEZZA

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,353
Ilaf isn’t always sure why she feels depressed, and she struggles to explain her feelings to her parents.
Note:CAUSE MISTERIOSE

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,356
iGen’ers look so happy online, making goofy faces on Snapchat and smiling in their pictures on Instagram. But dig deeper, and reality is not so comforting.
Note:ALLEGRI SOLO ONLINE

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,360
The Internet—and society in general—promotes a relentless positivity
Note:PENSA POSITIVO

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,365
Individualism also encourages people to feel good about themselves—
Note:LA CULTURA INDIVIDUALISTA

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,370
iGen’ers score lower in narcissism and have lower expectations,
Note:MENO NARCISISTI E MENO AMBIZIOSI

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,376
Just as iGen entered the samples, teen happiness started to wane
Note:GLI INFELICI

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,383
The first serious rumbles of the oncoming crash in iGen’ers’ outlook appear in their answers to questions asking whether they are satisfied with themselves
Note:SEI SODDISFATTO DI TE?

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,388
Percentage of 12th graders who are satisfied with their lives as a whole and with themselves. Monitoring the Future, 1976–2015.
Note:GRAFICO

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,391
Left Out and Lonely
Note:tttttt

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,392
she hadn’t been invited to. “I felt like I was the only one not there,”
Note:IL DRAMMA DI NN ESSERE INVITATI AL COMPLEANNO

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,393
“. . . I was thinking, they’re having a good time without me.
Note:ccccccc

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,396
iGen has a specific term for this: FOMO (Fear of Missing Out).
Note:FOMO

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,399
they are lonelier than they were just five years ago.
Note:SENSO DI SOLITUDINE

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,405
feeling left out has reached all-time highs.
Note:ESCLUSI

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,407
Such large changes over a short period of time are unusual, suggesting a specific cause with a big impact. Given the timing, smartphones are the most likely culprits,
Note:UNA CAUSA.... L IPOTESI SMARTPHONE

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,408
replacing in-person social interaction.
Note:TEMPO SPESO DA SOLI

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,414
teens who spend more time on social media also spend more time with their friends in person—
Note:PIÙ SOCIAL PIÙ COMPAGNIA

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,416
When teens as a group spend more time on screens and less time on in-person social interaction, loneliness will increase on average.
Yellow highlight | Location: 1,417
It’s possible that loneliness causes smartphone use instead of smartphone use causing loneliness, but the abrupt increase in loneliness makes this alternative much less likely.
Note:NESSO INVERSO POCO PROBABILE

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,421
Although the trend toward feeling left out appears among both boys and girls, the increase was especially steep among girls
Note:RAGAZZE PIÙ VULNERABILI

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,429
Afraid You’re Gonna Live: Depression
Note:ttttttt

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,433
“They all looked so damn happy to me. Why couldn’t I look like that?”
Note:IL PENSIERO RETROSTANTE

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,435
the constant thrum of social media and texting, has created an emotionally fragile generation prone to depression.
Note:FRAGILI

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,447
The data from these surveys are stark: teens’ depressive symptoms have skyrocketed in a very short period of time.
Note:IMPENNATA DEPRESSIONE

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,454
many people post only their successes online, so many teens don’t realize that their friends fail at things, too.
Note:IL RUOLO DEI SOCIAL

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,455
If they spent more time with their friends in person, they might realize that they are not the only ones making mistakes.
Note:cccccccccccccc

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,461
the patina of positivity on social media covering the ugly underbelly of reality.
Note:PATINA DI OTTIMISMO

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,462
Instagram posts, like ‘My life is so great.’
Note:GOOD LIFE

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,468
More teens in recent years agree with the depressing statement “My life is not useful,”
Note:ASSENZA DI SENSO

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,477
Just as with the rise in loneliness, girls have borne the brunt of the rise in depressive symptoms.
Note:RAGAZZE PIÙ VULNERABILI

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,498
spending more time on social media and less time on in-person social interaction is correlated with depression.
Note:IL RAPPORTO TEMPO SUI SOCIAL/TEMPO INSIEME È PREDITTIVO DELLA DEPRESSIONE

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,502
Could the Great Recession of 2007–2009 be the outside factor? It did come on suddenly, but the timing is wrong. Unemployment, one of the best indicators of how the economy is affecting real people, peaked in 2010 and then declined, exactly the opposite pattern from depression, which was stable until 2012 and then increased.
Note:IL TIMING DELLA CRISI

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,508
Why might smartphones cause depression? For one thing, not getting a reply to your text or social media message has a high potential for causing anxiety—
Note:INTERVENTI SENZA RISPOSTA

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,514
The emphasis on perfect selfies has amplified body image issues for girls, who often chase likes by taking hundreds of pictures to get just the right one but still end up feeling as though they’ve fallen short.
Note:FOTO E FISICO... RAGAZZE MINACCIATE

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,517
“Every day it’s like you have to wake up and put on a mask and try to be somebody else instead of being yourself,
Note:VIVERE IN PUBBLICO E VIVERE IPOCRITAMENTE

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,524
sexy photo will get lots of likes, but it also invites slut shaming.
Note | Location: 1,524
SEXY

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,527
An Epidemic of Anguish: Major Depressive Disorder, Self-Harm, and Suicide
Note:ttttttt

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,533
scared to grow up, terrified that she didn’t know exactly what would happen next.
Note:PAURA DEL FUTURO

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,548
The screening test shows a shocking rise in depression in a short period of time: 56% more teens experienced a major depressive episode in 2015 than in 2010
Note:DALLE INTERVISTE AI DATI CLINICI

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,554
clinically diagnosable major depression.
Note:cccccccc

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,556
the increase in major depressive episodes is far steeper among girls,
Note:GORLS

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,558
Depressed teens are more likely to self-injure, such as through cutting.
Note:TAGLI

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,567
Major depression, especially if it’s severe, is also the primary risk factor for suicide.
Note:SUICIDI

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,573
Suicide, a carefully tracked behavior unaffected by the possible irregularities of self-report surveys, is the most extreme and sadly objective outcome of depression.
Note:AFFIDABILITÁ DEI SUICIDI

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,578
The rise in suicide is more pronounced for girls.
Note:GIRL

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,583
It’s also surprising, because more Americans now take antidepressants
Note:NONOSTANTE GLI ANTIDEPRESSIVI

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,588
Why the Rise in Mental Health Issues?
Note:tttttttt

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,589
An article in The Atlantic blamed teen mental health issues almost exclusively on academic pressure.
Note:CAUSE... PRESSIONI ACCADEMICHE?

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,592
But one good indicator of academic pressure is the amount of time students spend on homework, and as we saw in chapter 1, time spent doing homework is less or about the same as in previous decades, with little change between 2012 and 2016, the years when depression skyrocketed.
Note:NO... TEMPO SPESO X I COMPITI

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,599
Time spent on exercise and sports is linked to less depression, but it didn’t change much since 2012, so they fail test number two, too.
Note:ATTIVITÀ FISICA... IRRILEVANTE

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,600
new-media screen time (such as electronic devices and social media) is linked to mental health issues and/or unhappiness, and it rose at the same time.
Note:ELEMENTI CORRELATI: SCREENING NOTOZIE A VODEO... RELAZIONI PERSONALI

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,602
in-person social interaction and print media are linked to less unhappiness and less depression,
Note:cccccccc

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,610
Another possibility is that iGen’ers are unprepared for adolescence and early adulthood due to their lack of independence.
Note:INDIPENDENZA

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,614
Students whose parents displayed those characteristics (often known as “helicopter parents”) had lower psychological well-being and were more likely to have been prescribed medication for anxiety and depression.
Note:DEPRESSIONE DA ELICOTTERO

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,627
Stealing Sleep
Note:ttttttt

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,628
Just before you go to bed, you check on your teen. It looks as though her light is off, but you’re not sure. Then you see it: the faint blue light of her phone as she looks at it in bed.
Note:CAMERETTE ILLUMINATE DAI VIDEO

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,634
Smartphone use may have decreased teens’ sleep time: more teens now sleep less than seven hours most nights (see Figure 4.12). Sleep experts say that teens should get about nine hours
Note:7 ORE ADI SONNO

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,652
Electronic devices and social media seem to be unique in their effect on sleep compared to older forms of media. Teens who read books and magazines more often are actually less likely to be sleep deprived—either reading puts them to sleep, or they can put the book down at bedtime. TV time is barely related to sleep time.
Note:NEW MEDIA E SONNO

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,656
Other activities that take up a lot of time, such as homework and working for pay, also increase the risk of missing out on sleep.
Note:PENALIZZAZIONE

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,662
Sleep deprivation is linked to myriad issues, including compromised thinking and reasoning, susceptibility to illness, increased weight gain, and high blood pressure. Sleep deprivation also has a significant effect on mood: people who don’t sleep enough are prone to depression and anxiety.
Note:ALTRE CONSEGUENZE

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,671
Intriguing new research shows that the blue light emitted by electronic devices tells our brains it’s still daytime, which makes the brain take longer to fall asleep.
Note:SEMPRE ATTIVI SEMPRE IN PISTA

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,676
What Can We Do?
Note:tttttttt

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,680
the case highlights a nationwide problem: the often inadequate resources for mental health assistance on college campuses.
Note:DEFICIT

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,685
High school students and their parents are already seeking help for psychological issues at an unprecedented rate.
Note:TUTTI DALLO BPSICOLOGO

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,689
The bigger problem will occur if young people don’t seek help.
Note:I PIÙ IN PERICOLO

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,692
Seeing a therapist is still taboo. . . . Nobody likes the idea of putting a label on what can so easily be written off as some form of insecurity—nobody wants to be diagnosed.”
Note:TABÙ

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,698
the abrupt rise in mental health issues strongly suggests that genetics is not the whole story.
Note:GENETICA

Yellow highlight | Location: 1,699
Among those predisposed to depression, only those who experience certain environments will actually become depressed.
ccccccccc


mercoledì 16 marzo 2016

Fifteen Matters of Life and Death - More Sex Is Safer Sex: The Unconventional Wisdom of Economics by Steven E. Landsburg

Fifteen Matters of Life and Death - More Sex Is Safer Sex: The Unconventional Wisdom of Economics by Steven E. Landsburg - #ventilatoripertutti #schellingavermicino #valoredellavitaevaloririschiosi #tuttiigiorniprezziamolavita #cellulariallaguida #blackstonetroppoprodigo #fareunastimadadoveiniziare
Fifteen Matters of Life and DeathRead more at location 2540
Note: Aiutare in modo empatico non significa dare cose anziché denaro ma "dare". Posso aiutare l'accaldato dandogli un ventilatore o dei soldi (taglio tasse). Solo la seconda soluzione è rispettosa delle volontà del prossimo Quel che non si vede: alfredino e il paracari di Shelling. La tassazione empatica come tassazione irrazionale Vite monetizzate. La tassa x scampare King Kong Edit
Note: 15@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Edit
There is room for a great deal of disagreement about how much assistance rich people should give to poor people, either voluntarily or through the tax system. But surely whatever we do spend should be spent in the ways that are most helpful. Therefore there’s no use arguing that the real trade-off should not be ventilators versus milk but ventilators versus tax cuts, or ventilators versus foreign wars.Read more at location 2565
Note: VENTILATORI PER TUTTI! Edit
The bloggers at Daily Kos would have us guarantee ventilator support to everyone who can’t afford it. For the same cost, we could give each of those people a choice between ventilator insurance or $75 cash.Read more at location 2569
Note: CASH O VENTILATORI? Edit
Remarkably, Professor Frank admits that most poor people would prefer the milk and eggs, but still argues for the ventilators on the grounds that it would make the rest of us feel better!Read more at location 2583
Note: VENTILARE LA COSCIENZA DEL DONATORE Edit
But ignoring other people’s needs to make yourself feel better is the very opposite of sympathy and empathy.Read more at location 2584
Many years ago, the Nobel laureate Thomas Schelling asked why communities will sometimes spend millions to save the life of a known victim—say, a trapped miner—but refuse to spend even, say, $200,000 on a highway guardrail that would save an average of one life per year. His answer was to distinguish between “identified lives”—like the trapped miner, or Tirhas Habtegiris—and “statistical lives,” like the unknown beneficiaries of the guardrail. Robert Frank embraces this distinction. For some reason, we are supposed to care more about identified lives than statistical lives,Read more at location 2587
Note: IL PARACARRO DI SCHELLING Edit
Besides being incoherent, the distinction between a statistical and an identified life is morally obtuse.Read more at location 2601
The identified/statistical life approach says, in essence, that I should prefer three deaths to one death as long as the three victims happen to be invisible.Read more at location 2613
Note: VISIBILE INVISIBILE Edit
If I could save you $5 in taxes by releasing a toxic chemical that might kill you—say with a probability of one in a million—I wouldn’t do it. If I could save you $20 in taxes by releasing the same chemical, I probably would.Read more at location 2616
Note: VALORE DELLA VITA Edit
I know this because economists have made a habit of observing people’s choices—for example, the size of the pay cuts they’ll accept to move into safer jobs. On that basis, Harvard Law professor Kip Viscusi estimates that the average American will pay about $5 to steer clear of a one-in-a-million chance of being killed. For blue-collar women, it’s closer to $7, and for blue-collar men it’s even higher.Read more at location 2620
Note: LAVORI RISCHIOSI Edit
Your life is probably worth somewhere between five and ten million dollars.Read more at location 2628
If King Kong is likely to kill 300 Americans out of 300 million, there’s a one in a million chance you’ll be a victim. If we can stop him with $300 million worth of ape repellent—that is, $1 million per life—your share of the tax bill comes to about a dollar. That’s a good deal. But if instead it costs $30 billion to stop Kong, then it’s better to let him wreak havoc. Your share of that $30 billion would be $100, and we know from Professor Viscusi’s studies that almost nobody wants to pay that much to avoid a one-in-a-million chance of death.Read more at location 2631
Note: FERMARE KING KONG Edit
Cell-phone use increases your accident risk by almost 400 percent. But so what?Read more at location 2643
Note: CELLULARE ALLA GUIDA Edit
Just getting behind the wheel (as opposed to staying home in bed) multiplies your accident risk by far more than 400 percent, but so far the Tappets have not proposed to outlaw driving.Read more at location 2645
Note: INCIDENTI Edit
The analysis is courtesy of Brookings Institution economists Robert Hahn, Paul Tetlock, and Jason Burnett, who reckon that drivers’ cell phones are indeed deadly but nevertheless (on balance) a good thing.Read more at location 2651
The researchers estimate that in one year, driver use of cell phones caused about 300 fatalities, 38,000 nonfatal injuries, and 200,000 damaged vehicles.Read more at location 2657
the price is $6.6 million, a widely used standard based on Kip Viscusi’s analysis.Read more at location 2662
You implicitly put a dollar value on human lives every time you buy a candy bar with funds that could instead have been donated to the local fire department. No matter who you are, there is a limit to what you’re willing to spend to save lives;Read more at location 2664
Note: OGNI GIORNO QUANTIFICHIAMO LA VITA Edit
the only question is whether you’re willing to think honestly about what that limit is.Read more at location 2666
Note: ONESTÀ Edit
Pricing the fatalities at $6.6 million each, and adding in the costs of injuries and vehicle damage, Mr. Hahn and his colleagues estimate that in one year, cell-phone use by drivers caused $4.6 billion worth of damage.Read more at location 2669
the value of a cell-phone call is equal to what you’re willing to pay for it, minus what you actually pay for it. Willingness to pay is estimated from demand studies (factoring in the truism that some calls are worth more than others). Actual charges, of course, come from real-life cell-phone bills.Read more at location 2672
Note: VALORE DELLA CHIAMATA: IL PIACRRE CHE MI DÀ (QUANTO SAREI DISPOSTO A PAGARE) MENO QUANTO PAGO. Edit
in one year, cell-phone calls made by drivers had a total value of $25 billion. That $25 billion benefit beats the $4.6 billion cost,Read more at location 2675
Actually, I don’t buy it, for a variety of reasons. First, drivers make a lot of calls that could easily wait for the next rest stop.Read more at location 2676
Note: DUBBI Edit
Moreover, Hahn et al missed a potentially important factor on the cost side: they counted fatalities, they counted injuries, they counted property damage, but they failed to account for the inconvenience to people who choose not to drive because cell phones have made driving more dangerous.Read more at location 2680
Note: E CHI RINUNCIA A GUIDARE? Edit
Over two centuries ago, a lawyer named William Blackstone declared that it’s better for ten guilty persons to escape than for one innocent to suffer. Why ten, as opposed to, say, twelve or eight?Read more at location 2691
Note: LO STANDARD DI BLACKSTONE Edit
for two centuries, legal scholars have cited Blackstone’s refusal to think and mistaken it for an example of a thought.Read more at location 2693
Note: LIQUIDARE IL TRADE OFF Edit
The cost (to you) of a false conviction is that you might be the unlucky innocent who goes to jail. The cost (to you) of a false acquittal is that you might cross paths with the criminal we just freed (or with some other criminal who’s feeling emboldened by all these false acquittals). A “ten guilty men” standard saddles you with one bundle of risks; a “five guilty men” or a “hundred guilty men” standard saddles you with another. The right standard is the one that saddles you with the burden you prefer (where “prefer” means “dislike the least”).Read more at location 2699
Note: UNO STANDARD EQUO Edit
Ten false acquittals in murder cases give you ten chances to cross paths with a newly released murderer. One false conviction gives you one chance of landing (at worst) in the electric chair. I’m not so fond of either prospect, but given a choice, I’ll take the latter.Read more at location 2704
Note: BLACKSTONE TROPPO PRODIGO? Edit
I expect we’d all be happier with, say, a “three guilty men” standard: if we’re 75 percent sure you did the crime, you do the time.Read more at location 2706
The cutoff for reasonable doubt should be at the odds we find just barely acceptable.Read more at location 2709
Note: RAGIONEVOLE DUBBIO Edit
If you never miss a plane, you’re spending too much time in airports; if you never convict an innocent, you’re not convicting enough of the guilty.Read more at location 2715
Note: TRADE OFF Edit
But I am substantially less comfortable with it in a world where policemen (and others) sometimes manufacture evidence against peopleRead more at location 2717
Note: POLIZIA CORROTTA Edit
That makes me want to nudge the cutoff up a bit, probably to something very like Blackstone’s ninety-something-percent standard.Read more at location 2718
If we execute murderers, why not execute the people who write computer worms? According to the math on the back of my envelope, it would be a better investment.Read more at location 2720
Note: PENA DI MORTE X CHI INFETTA I PC Edit
First, what’s the value of executing a murderer? A high-end estimate is that each execution deters about ten murdersRead more at location 2722
Note: I HENEGIVI DI UCCIDERE UN ASSASSINO Edit
So call it ten lives saved, with a value—again a high-end estimate—of about $10 million apiece. Then the benefit of executing a murderer is roughly ten times $10 million, or $100 million—andRead more at location 2723
It’s estimated that vermiscripting and related activities cost the world about $50 billion a year.Read more at location 2727
There are a lot of reasons to believe the number is seriously overblown, not least because victimized firms tend to exaggerate the damage when they’re making insurance claims.Read more at location 2729
Given that $50 billion figure, all we’d have to do is deter just one-fifth of one percent of all vermiscripting for just one year in order to gain the same $100 million benefit we get from executing a killer.Read more at location 2731
Executing the murderer means giving you the safety. Executing the vermiscriptor means giving you the cash. You’d rather have the cash than the safety. Ergo, executing the vermiscriptor is the better policy.Read more at location 2755
Note: MEGLIO IL CASH CHE L ASSICURAZIONE Edit
There’s at least one exceptionRead more at location 2757
Note: ALTRRNATIVA Edit
If we can effectively deter malicious hackers by cutting off their supply of Twinkies or crippling their EverQuest avatars, then there’s no need to fry them.