Visualizzazione post con etichetta garett jones hive mind. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta garett jones hive mind. Mostra tutti i post

mercoledì 20 novembre 2019

caplan risponde a jones

Garett Jones è il critico più brillante delle politiche di libera immigrazione. Il suo argomento base è di tipo empirico: se l'intelligenza di una persona beneficia quella persona, l'intelligenza media di una nazione beneficia quella nazione. Ma qui arriva la sorpresa: il rapporto tra il primo beneficio e il secondo è circa di 1 a 6.

Ebbene, cosa succederebbe se l'immigrazione negli Stati Uniti fosse libera? Secondo le Stime di Jones il reddito pro capite collasserebbe del 50% mentre la produzione totale aumenterebbe di oltre l'80%. Ci sarebbero quindi molti benefici ma sarebbero incamerati esclusivamente dagli immigrati (che partirebbero da un reddito pro-capite bassissimo). Lo standard di vita degli indigeni si abbasserebbe di un notevole 40%. Tutto questo per il semplice fatto che l' IQ medio negli USA è di circa 11 punti più elevato del IQ medio dei suoi immigrati. I confini aperti innalzerebbe l'IQ medio della comunità immigrata e abbasserebbero quello della comunità ospitante.

Come rispondere a Jones? Innanzitutto attenzione ai benefici che ci conferisce il nostro IQ, spesso si confonde con i benefici che noi attribuiamo all'istruzione. Un dovuto controllo riaggiusterebbe verso l'alto le stime. Poi c'è una questione storica: sembra alquanto strano che il PIL possa raddoppiare senza benefici più o meno universali, nella storia non sembra che questo sia mai successo: la rivoluzione industriale non ha beneficiato solo i proprietari di fabbriche, internet non beneficia solo i programmatori o gli imprenditori tecnologici. Poi, tornando al rapporto 1 a 6, c'è la questione più importante: siamo sicuri che in una società con l'IQ medio che si abbassa avere un IQ molto superiore alla media ci benefici così poco? Pensiamo al Sudafrica, l' 80% della popolazione è nera e il 9% bianca, i bianchi hanno un IQ più elevato dei neri; se le stime di Jones fossero corrette dovremmo aspettarci redditi poco più elevati mentre invece, dopo 30 anni dalla fine dell'apartheid, il reddito dei bianchi è circa del 500% maggiore rispetto al reddito medio dei neri. Da ultimo, ci sono ragioni per sperare che l'accesso alle società occidentali aumenti l'IQ dei bambini immigrati senza deprimere quello dei nativi.

https://feedly.com/i/entry/B7jw4LCucCLXhd0mcd9EmMn+sbxtNLGOdNAs60PDOTo=_16e8422513f:49d7e1e:69b9f616

lunedì 18 novembre 2019

LA MENTE DELL'ALVEARE (e lo ius soli)

LA MENTE DELL'ALVEARE (e lo ius soli)
L'intelligenza di una persona si riflette in positivo nel successo della sua opera. Anche l'intelligenza media di una nazione si riflette in positivo nell'esito di cio' che fa. Fin qui l'intuito ci aiuta a capire.
Quel che ci sfugge, invece, è quanto la seconda relazione sia più potente della prima. Circa sei volte più potente! La "mente" dell'alveare conta più della "mente" delle singole api. Perché?
Forse perché un gruppo di persone intelligenti sa cooperare meglio, oltre che agire meglio.
Forse perché un elettorato attivo intelligente vota meglio.
Forse perché gli "intelligentoni" attirano persone intelligenti mentre i cretini attirano i cretini. Ovvero, chi fa danni tende ad associarsi con chi produce poco valore, in modo da fare meno danni possibile (l'impresa di pulizie della NASA è fantastica).
Oggi l'intelligenza media delle nazioni occidentali è abbassata dall'immigrazione. Che fare?
Medicina e istruzione, per esempio, possono cambiare l'intelligenza di una persona. Un pochino sì, poco.
Che conclusioni trarne? Di sicuro queste considerazioni non incoraggiano lo ius soli.

Chapter 10 POEM AND CONCLUSION

Chapter 10 POEM AND CONCLUSION
Note:10@@@@@@@@@@

Yellow highlight | Location: 2,521
Whose Skills Matter Most for Productivity?
Note:Ttttttt

Yellow highlight | Location: 2,524
Rindermann
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,526
the best guess is that the cognitive skill of elites really does matter more than the nation’s average score.
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,529
it’s worth keeping in mind that countries with high average test scores almost always have high average test scores among the top 5 percent,
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,534
why
Note:Ttttt

Yellow highlight | Location: 2,534
set an example of frugality that others would follow?
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,535
control over the political process?
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,535
Would they be the positive reciprocators
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,537
The Best Way to Raise National Average IQ: A Mystery Worth Solving
Note:Tttttttt

Yellow highlight | Location: 2,540
an overwhelming difference, between genuinely raising broad-based cognitive skills versus just boosting one particular score on one particular standardized test.
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,542
Let’s search for policies that yield a da Vinci Effect,
Note:Medicina o istruzione

Yellow highlight | Location: 2,544
A Global Flynn Cycle: A Possibility Worth Striving For
Note:Ttttttt

Yellow highlight | Location: 2,547
IQ mattered about six times more for nations than for individuals:
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,549
the patience channel of Ramsey, the cooperation channel of Axelrod, the voting channel of Caplan, the O-ring channel of Kremer, the conformity channel of Asch.
Note:Spiegazioni

Yellow highlight | Location: 2,550
IQ multipliers,
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,552
if higher mental skills raise productivity and productivity raises health and health in turn raises mental skills,
Note:Ciclo

Yellow highlight | Location: 2,554
can health and nutrition and educational reforms raise IQ scores
interventi

giovedì 11 maggio 2017

L'anello debole della catena

Cosa succede quando una massa di umili lavoratori immigrati provenienti da altre culture irrompe in un paese occidentale ad alto tenore di vita con un sistema produttivo avanzato?
Forse il più titolato a rispondere è l’economista Garett Jones che ci fornisce qualche dritta nel suo saggio “THE O-RING THEORY OF TEAMS AND THE ENDLESS QUEST FOR SUBSTITUTES AND THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF IMMIGRATION”.
Per capire cosa sia la teoria o-ring bisogna partire dallo shuttle, sì, quell’affare americano che volava in giro per lo spazio. In particolare dalla tragedia di cui fu protagonista…
… 1986, THE SPACE SHUTTLE CHALLENGER EXPLODED shortly after take-off, killing all seven astronauts aboard. The cause of the explosion was the failure of one of the rubber O-rings—essentially rubber bands—that helped to seal the joints in the shuttle’s booster rockets. The O-rings served as gasket seals, like washers in a faucet, there to ensure that burning fuel didn’t leak out. It was too cold the morning of the launch, so the rubber O-rings became too rigid to maintain the seal and the burning rocket fuel escaped, heating the shuttle’s massive external fuel tank and creating the fatal explosion. The failure of one O-ring was enough to cost the lives of all seven astronauts… it is the smallest of failures that can cause the greatest of losses…
Una minuzia, un gommino fece fallire il volo, provocò sette vittime, vanificò il lavoro di decine di ingegneri spaziali e fece dire basta alle avventure cosmiche di un paese.
La teoria o-ring nasce da un’intuizione di Michael Kremer
… Harvard economist Michael Kremer saw the O-ring story as a tale of tragedy, but he saw something else as well: he saw a parable that might help explain why workers in some countries are so much more productive than quite similar workers in other countries. Kremer’s O-ring theory assumed that some kinds of projects are like the space shuttle—in which any one failure can lead to disaster…
La teoria spiega bene le disegueglianze che esistono anche tra chi fa il medesimo lavoro, spiega il perché i migliori vanno con i migliori e i peggiori con i peggiori. Lo intuiamo facilmente guardando alla vicenda dello shuttle: anche chi si dedica alle minuzie, qualcosa che in teoria potrebbe fare chiunque, deve farlo con la massima cura, non tanto per quello che fa in sè (una minuzia resta una minuzia) ma per quello che puo’ distruggere.
… why the janitors and executive assistants at top law firms earn more than people with the same jobs at ordinary law firms, why small differences in the average skill of workers across countries can cause massive differences in productivity across countries, and why the richest countries tend to produce entirely different goods than the poorest countries…
Ci sono produzioni in cui la squadra è come una catena. Ebbene, la robustezza della catena è pari alla robustezza dell’anello più debole.
Si realizza una concentrazione verticale dei talenti:
… business owners will naturally—by an invisible hand—put highly skilled workers together on the most valuable projects and put lower-skilled workers together on the less valuable projects… that’s an O-ring sector of the economy: since one mistake can destroy most of the value…
Un esempio di settore o-ring è l’industria cinematografica
… Here is one modern example of an O-ring production method that we’re all familiar with: moviemaking. Why do award-winning directors team up with award-winning cinematographers and get a musical score by elite composers such as Ennio Morricone or John Williams or Hans Zimmer? Why do the best tend to work with the best—and the not-quite-best with the not-quite-best? Perhaps it’s all just ego, but at least some of the time it’s surely the production company—the people with financial skin in the game—insisting that the famous director team up with the famous cinematographer rather than the famous director’s buddy from film school…
Nei settori o-ring le forze non si addizionano ma si moltiplicano tra loro ma si tratta pur sempre di concatenazioni fragili, facili alla rottura…
…There’s a bigger lesson behind these tales of vases and movies: O-ring thinking gets us away from addition and pushes us toward exponents—when doubling a small number still yields a pretty small number, but doubling two small numbers—and then multiplying them together—can yield a huge number… O-ring technologies produce products that are delicate, fragile, and easy to break…
Facciamo un altro esempio nel ramo del diritto…
… The lawyers working on a billion-dollar corporate merger are probably working with an O-ring technology, in which one typo can mean a $100 million lawsuit down the road…
O in quello medico
… if you’re having open heart surgery it’s probably a good idea to have the best nurses, the best cardiologists, and the best anesthesiologists together in the same room. On a routine appendectomy you’ll rarely see that combination…
La fragilità dipende anche dalla lunghezza delle catena: più anelli ci sono più cresce la probabilità di un anello debole.
… If your laptop’s battery and screen and eight other critical pieces each work 99 percent of the time, you’ve only got a 90 percent chance of a working laptop. The longer the chain of production, the bigger the exponent, and the bigger the payoff to finding even slightly more reliable workers…
Naturalmente, l’attività produttiva non si configura sempre come o-ring
… sometimes you can just throw enough person-hours at a problem and things will work out reasonably well—lawnmowing comes to mind, or perhaps routine food preparation or run-of-the-mill divorce paperwork or grading homework in an introductory economics course…
Cosa ci insegna allora l’o-ring? Che i migliori vanno con i migliori, anche se la differenza tra migliori e peggiori è minima.
… it shows how small differences in worker skill—along any dimension—can lead to big differences in who works together, what they produce, and how much they earn…
Inoltre, bisogna dire, che i migliori ci migliorano, per esempio nella motivazione, cosicché lo iato che crea l’ o-ring è destinato a dilatarsi…
… There’s another reason to think that when workers are on team projects, we’ll see a lot more output when the best are paired with the best: because workers inspire and motivate each other, for good and for ill. Humans pay attention to what’s going on around them, and tend, even unconsciously, to imitate the behaviors they see… Berkeley economists Alexandre Mas and Enrico Moretti did something else with that information: they checked to see if workers became more productive when they were put onto a shift with the top clerks, and if they became less productive when put onto a shift with the weaker clerks.3 Perhaps it’s no surprise that on average clerks rose (or descended) to the occasion…
Gli sportivi conoscono bene questo meccanismo…
… Perhaps this is little surprise: swimmers and runners and athletes of all types know that you’re a bit more likely to train harder when you’re in the presence of stronger athletes…
Più ampio è il gruppo più l’effetto incide…
… And remember: on a team, we are, each of us, potential motivators. So the bigger the team, the bigger the motivational side effect…
L’ IQ è una buona approssimazione delle abilità…
… academic management researchers have run dozens of studies checking to see if higher-average-IQ teams are more productive than lower-average-IQ teams… Unsurprisingly, the average IQ of team members does indeed predict team productivity across about two dozen studies…
Qualora la produzione sia o-ring il parametro fondamentale è l’IQ più basso del gruppo…
… My presumption is that the question of which IQ score matters most—the team high, team low, or team average—will vary from task to task. The more O-ring the process the more that the weakest team member’s IQ score will matter…
La teoria delle relazioni di Matthew Jackson offre altre motivazioni per cui l’ IQ medio (o il più basso) incidono pesantemente sulla produttività di un gruppo.
… Jackson’s theory of networks starts with the obvious points that some human relationships are more valuable than others and that relationships are expensive to create…
L’ IQ dei partecipanti incide sulla qualità della rete di connessioni…
… Once one starts thinking about the value of connections, of relationships, it becomes obvious that cognitive skills are going to be a key ingredient in building good networks. Remembering the names of distant acquaintances, recalling the time that the company found someone to supply those specialized hard drives at the last minute, figuring out that Carlos in accounting has just the skill set that Marjorie in the executive suite was looking for in an executive VP—these are all skills that will be more common among people with higher IQ scores… working memory is one of the better predictors of IQ…
Il gioco del telegrafo senza fili offre un’analogia…
… You know the game of Telephone: kids sit in a circle, the first person whispers a slightly complicated phrase such as “The kittens go to the vet at 5 p.m. Sunday” into the ear of the child on her right. That child whispers what he hears to the person on his right, and so on around the room, with small errors accumulating until the first kid is finally told “The kids go to the Fabian Soap Derby.” Corporations, government agencies, nonprofits—all are playing games of Telephone on a daily basis. Personally, I’d love to see a study of whether higher-IQ teams are better at Telephone than teams with average IQ…
Un’altra teoria economica che esalta l’uniformità del gruppo è quella del “cheap talk” di Sobel e Crawford: 1) quanto più gli interessi di due persone convergono, tanto più si parleranno in modo esplicito, 2) se gli interessi divergono si parleranno in codice, 3) le persone con alto IQ dominano meglio i vari codici 4) le persone con alto IQ si coordinano meglio anche quando i loro interessi non convergono…
… when two people have more in common—perhaps they’re on the same football team, trying to win the FIFA World Cup—A will tend to speak clearly to B. When they have no common interests—perhaps they are strangers, or even nations at war—A will speak in gibberish to B… Sobel and Crawford prove that even if two players have an infinitely large language at their disposal—infinite numbers or words or even multiple languages—a rational player A who shares only a partial common interest with his fellow player B will use only a partial set of the messages at his disposal. He’ll speak in a stilted language… In the rich countries we see politicians talk this way all the time: there are only a few “policy stances” a senator can take, and she’s considered either a “moderate,” a “conservative,” or a “progressive” with maybe a handful of other options. Even though she might hold sophisticated, nuanced views on Shakespeare or the Qing dynasty or the best way to train for a marathon, once she switches to her role of senator the subtlety drains away and she is reduced to speaking in clichés. Part of the reason for speaking in clichés is because that’s what voters can most easily remember—voters pay little attention to politics most of the time, so branding is important… Sobel and Crawford’s finding: when two people in any kind of short-run interaction have diverging interests, both sides know that any statement gets taken with a grain of salt…But I want to push beyond the formal model to suggest that people with high average test scores are more likely to convert a game of conflict into a game of cooperation…
L’esempio classico è il divorzio: due coniugi intelligenti sapranno mettere da parte il rancore e distinguere quelle aree in cui conviene a tutti e due trovare un accordo… 
… Two reasonably intelligent people getting divorced certainly face a zero-sum game when it comes to how they split up the retirement savings… part of the power of memory, part of the power of being able to recall obscure facts, is the power to remember interests the couple still have in common: “Oh, there’s a day care right between our two houses,” “Here’s an investment company that doesn’t add on fees when we split our retirement plans in half,” “I read about a job online that might be a good fit for you.” There’s at least the opportunity to think win-win… It’s that the memory skills and other traits that higher-IQ individuals tend to have are useful in searching out win-win possibilities…
Adam Smith nel primo capitolo de “La ricchezza delle nazioni” esponeva il concetto di “specializzazione del lavoro” ricorrendo alla descrizione di una fabbrica di aghi. Gli studiosi hanno reagito in modo diverso. C’è chi c’ha visto l’elemento alienante e chi c’ha visto l’elemento discriminante che tende a riunire i migliori con i migliori…
… Marx looked at the pin factory and saw workers alienated from the craft process, for instance. A second way to look at the pin factory is to see an O-ring process at work, in which one weak worker means you’re making pounds of shoddy pins each day. A third way is to see peer effects when a talented new worker ever so subtly inspires others to work just a little bit harder… Production is a team effort, and teams with better-than-average memories, better-than-average social intelligence, and better-than-average job skills can become vastly more productive than even a slightly less-skilled team…
Bene, direi che ora possediamo l’apparato concettuale per maneggiare il problema dell’immigrazione di massa di lavoratori generici.
Cominciamo col dire che la produzione o-ring non è l’unica, anzi quella più studiata è la Cobb-Douglas a rendimenti decrescenti. Nell’o-ring le abilità dei lavoratori interagiscono esaltandosi tra loro mentre nei settori “impermeabili” (o Cobb-Douglas) i lavoratori non interagiscono tra loro e le abilità si sommano per realizzare la produzione complessiva.
Ipotizziamo un economia mista: due settori, uno o-ring e uno foolproof…
… In a paper I wrote a few years ago I created a mathematical model that showed what happens if some parts of the economy are O-ring, in which team skills matter a lot, and other parts of the economy are Foolproof… There are two kinds of tasks: delicate O-ring jobs and rough-and-tumble Foolproof jobs… This model, a dramatic oversimplification of real-world economies, might help explain why people with high test scores typically earn only a little more than their average neighbors within a country but why nations with high average test scores earn vastly more than nations with just ordinary scores…
Si noti che la diseguaglianza nei settori o-ring è minima perché c’è chi produce molto e chi puo’ distruggere molto, cosicché tutti devono essere compensati a dovere. D’altro canto – se è possibile distinguere i lavoratori migliori dai peggiori – le diseguaglianze tra chi lavora nell’ o-ring e chi lavora nel foolproof possono essere profonde.
Un primo scenario potrebbe essere quello dei cloni:
… Imagine all workers in the same country have exactly the same skill set, a nation of clones…
In questo caso non è possibile distinguere i migliori dai peggiori cosicché le diseguaglianze di trattamento economico sono azzerate indipendentemente dal settore dove si lavora: se l’o-ring paga meglio del foolproof tutti andranno lì finché il foolproof non pagherà meglio dell’o-ring, fino a raggiungere un equilibrio.
Pensate ad un paese in cui tutti sono laureati e specializzati in ingegneria spaziale. Lo spazzino guadagnerà come l’astronauta e naturalmente, come l’astronauta, sarà un ingegnere spaziale.
Se le abilità dei lavoratori variano il modello fa la previsione attesa: comincerà la discriminazione dei migliori con i migliori nei settori o-ring. 
… the first big prediction of the O-ring-Foolproof model: if one were to compare across countries that differ in average skill level, in nations of high average skill level—measured how you will—one will tend to see a bigger fraction of the workers in delicate, cutting-edge O-ring tasks and a smaller fraction of workers engaged in routine decades-old work tasks…
E nel caso comincino i flussi migratori di lavoratori non specializzati e non integrati? Chiamiamoli pure i “peggiori”, nel senso che a volte nemmeno sanno parlare la lingua della comunità.
Costoro non entreranno certo nei settori o-ring poiché farebbero crollare lo shuttle. Entreranno nei settori foolproof.
Questo cosa comporta? Ci sono diverse possibilità.
Quella più comprensibile è che una maggiore concorrenza tra i “peggiori” porti ad un abbassamento dei redditi e a diseguaglianze ancora più forti.
Ma c’è un altro esito possibile. Ricordate l’ingegnere spaziale che faceva lo spazzino? Nello scenario dei cloni una figura del genere è la regola ma anche nel secondo scenario c’è una quota residuale di soggetti con queste caratteristiche. Ecco, costoro a fronte della nuova concorrenza potrebbero migrare nell’o-ring (hanno le carte in regola per farlo) e intaccare i redditi dei “migliori”. Magari non proprio dei migliori ma della classe media sì. A volte questa migrazione, paradossalmente, alza i redditi del settore foolproof.
Forse è proprio per l’effetto appena descritto che negli USA l’immigrazione non ha comportato un calo rilevante nel reddito dei lavoratori più umili:
… For the rich countries, especially for the well-studied United States …less-skilled immigration doesn’t do much to the wages of U.S.-born residents… The most pessimistic academic estimates come from Harvard economists George Borjas and Larry Katz, who reported that less-skilled immigration may have pushed down the wages of American high school dropouts by 8 percent… It’s even possible that economists Ottaviano and Peri are right: they claim that less-skilled immigration to the United States has actually raised the wages… For that and other reasons—in the authors’ words, because of different abilities in “language, quantitative skills, relationship skills and so on”—they’re not in direct competition with U.S.-born, less-skilled, less-educated workers. In this view the people in the United States hurt most by recent waves of nonnative-English-speaking immigrants are actually people who came as part of previous waves of non-native-English-speaking immigrants. Recent immigrants and older immigrants are substitutes for each other…
Quando la migrazione si fa massiccia la concorrenza si concentra nei settori foolproof ed è essenzialmente concorrenza tra immigrati.
Possiamo concludere dicendo che l’immigrazione offre un grande beneficio all’immigrato senza colpire granché il “non specializzato nativo”. A volte ne risente di più la classe media. 
… the biggest beneficiaries of less-skilled immigration are the immigrants themselves, whose lives are often transformed from a nightmare of dollar-a-day poverty to a realm of modest comfort, health, and safety… It’s always worth reminding citizens of the high-productivity countries that immigration is still the most reliable way to raise the living standards of people in low-productivity countries. Rather then send aid workers or cash to help people in poor countries…
Il problema si potrebbe far sentire quando la carenza di nativi è tale da spingere l’ingresso nell’o-ring anche dei lavoratori “peggiori” (immigrati): a quel punto lo shuttle sarebbe in pericolo, il loro potenziale distruttivo è immenso.
Oppure quando individui a basso IQ votano. Probabilmente voteranno per politiche ottuse (tipo quelle anti-immigrazione o stataliste) mettendo nei guai una nazione. Ma questa è un’ altra storia.

giovedì 6 ottobre 2016

Chapter 8 THE O-RING THEORY OF TEAMS - hive mind garett jones

Chapter 8 THE O-RING THEORY OF TEAMSRead more at location 2138
Note: 8@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Edit
1986, THE SPACE SHUTTLE CHALLENGER EXPLODED shortly after take-off, killing all seven astronauts aboard. The cause of the explosion was the failure of one of the rubber O-rings—essentially rubber bands—that helped to seal the joints in the shuttle’s booster rockets. The O-rings served as gasket seals, like washers in a faucet, there to ensure that burning fuel didn’t leak out. It was too cold the morning of the launch, so the rubber O-rings became too rigid to maintain the seal and the burning rocket fuel escaped, heating the shuttle’s massive external fuel tank and creating the fatal explosion. The failure of one O-ring was enough to cost the lives of all seven astronauts.Read more at location 2139
Note: IL FATTO DELLO SHUTTLE Edit
it is the smallest of failures that can cause the greatest of losses.Read more at location 2145
Note: IN MOLTI CASI... Edit
Harvard economist Michael Kremer saw the O-ring story as a tale of tragedy, but he saw something else as well: he saw a parable that might help explain why workers in some countries are so much more productive than quite similar workers in other countries.1 Kremer’s O-ring theory assumed that some kinds of projects are like the space shuttle—in which any one failure can lead to disasterRead more at location 2145
Note: INTUIZIONE DI KREMER Edit
why the janitors and executive assistants at top law firms earn more than people with the same jobs at ordinary law firms, why small differences in the average skill of workers across countries can cause massive differences in productivity across countries, and why the richest countries tend to produce entirely different goods than the poorest countries.Read more at location 2150
Note: XCHÈ PLA DISEGUAGLIANZA IN BASSO Edit
In an O-ring economy, the clichés are true: a chain is only as strong as its weakest link; for want of a nail a battle can be lost.Read more at location 2159
Note: LA ROBUSTEZZA DELL ANELLO DEBOLE Edit
business owners will naturally—by an invisible hand—put highly skilled workers together on the most valuable projects and put lower-skilled workers together on the less valuable projects.Read more at location 2160
Note: CONCENTRAZIONE VERTICALE DEI TALENTI Edit
that’s an O-ring sector of the economy: since one mistake can destroy most of the value,Read more at location 2178
Note: DEF Edit
Here is one modern example of an O-ring production method that we’re all familiar with: moviemaking. Why do award-winning directors team up with award-winning cinematographers and get a musical score by elite composers such as Ennio Morricone or John Williams or Hans Zimmer? Why do the best tend to work with the best—and the not-quite-best with the not-quite-best? Perhaps it’s all just ego, but at least some of the time it’s surely the production company—the people with financial skin in the game—insisting that the famous director team up with the famous cinematographer rather than the famous director’s buddy from film school.Read more at location 2180
Note: L ESEMPIO DEL CINEMA Edit
There’s a bigger lesson behind these tales of vases and movies: O-ring thinking gets us away from addition and pushes us toward exponents—when doubling a small number still yields a pretty small number, but doubling two small numbers—and then multiplying them together—can yield a huge number.Read more at location 2190
Note: DAL MONDO DELLE ADDIZIONI A QUELLO DELLE POTENZE Edit
O-ring technologies produce products that are delicate, fragile, and easy to break.Read more at location 2194
Note: FRAGILITÀ Edit
The lawyers working on a billion-dollar corporate merger are probably working with an O-ring technology, in which one typo can mean a $100 million lawsuit down the road,Read more at location 2195
Note: AVVOCATI Edit
if you’re having open heart surgery it’s probably a good idea to have the best nurses, the best cardiologists, and the best anesthesiologists together in the same room. On a routine appendectomy you’ll rarely see that combination:Read more at location 2196
Note: CUORE E APPENDICE Edit
The longer the chain of production, the easier it is to break the links.Read more at location 2205
Note: x Edit
If your laptop’s battery and screen and eight other critical pieces each work 99 percent of the time, you’ve only got a 90 percent chance of a working laptop. The longer the chain of production, the bigger the exponent, and the bigger the payoff to finding even slightly more reliable workers.Read more at location 2208
Note: ES LAPTOP Edit
sometimes you can just throw enough person-hours at a problem and things will work out reasonably well—lawnmowing comes to mind, or perhaps routine food preparation or run-of-the-mill divorce paperwork or grading homework in an introductory economics course.Read more at location 2210
Note: ASSENZA DI O RING Edit
Evidence for O-RingsRead more at location 2214
Note: T Edit
it shows how small differences in worker skill—along any dimension—can lead to big differences in who works together, what they produce, and how much they earn.Read more at location 2214
Note: COSA MOSTRA O RING Edit
There’s another reason to think that when workers are on team projects, we’ll see a lot more output when the best are paired with the best: because workers inspire and motivate each other, for good and for ill. Humans pay attention to what’s going on around them, and tend, even unconsciously, to imitate the behaviors they see.Read more at location 2221
Note: O RING DELLA MOTIVAZIONE Edit
Berkeley economists Alexandre Mas and Enrico Moretti did something else with that information: they checked to see if workers became more productive when they were put onto a shift with the top clerks, and if they became less productive when put onto a shift with the weaker clerks.3 Perhaps it’s no surprise that on average clerks rose (or descended) to the occasion:Read more at location 2227
Note: I MIGLORI CI MIGLIORANO Edit
Perhaps this is little surprise: swimmers and runners and athletes of all types know that you’re a bit more likely to train harder when you’re in the presence of stronger athletes.Read more at location 2237
Note: GLI SPORTIVI LO SANNO Edit
And remember: on a team, we are, each of us, potential motivators. So the bigger the team, the bigger the motivational side effect.Read more at location 2243
Note: PIÙ GRANDE È IL GRUPPO PIÙ L EFFETTO INCIDE Edit
academic management researchers have run dozens of studies checking to see if higher-average-IQ teams are more productive than lower-average-IQ teams.Read more at location 2245
Note: L OQ COME PROXY DELLE SKILL. IQ MEDIO DEL GRUPPO Edit
Unsurprisingly, the average IQ of team members does indeed predict team productivity across about two dozen studies.Read more at location 2248
Note: OVVIO Edit
My presumption is that the question of which IQ score matters most—the team high, team low, or team average—will vary from task to task. The more O-ring the process the more that the weakest team member’s IQ score will matter.Read more at location 2250
Note: PRESUNZIONE. IQ E O RING. L IQ PIÙ BASSO È LA VARIABILE PIÙ RILEVANTE Edit
Beyond O-Rings and PeersRead more at location 2262
Note: T Edit
theory of endogenous network formation, associated with Stanford’s Matthew Jackson.8 Jackson’s theory of networks starts with the obvious points that some human relationships are more valuable than others and that relationships are expensive to create.Read more at location 2265
Note: JACKSON THEORY Edit
Once one starts thinking about the value of connections, of relationships, it becomes obvious that cognitive skills are going to be a key ingredient in building good networks. Remembering the names of distant acquaintances, recalling the time that the company found someone to supply those specialized hard drives at the last minute, figuring out that Carlos in accounting has just the skill set that Marjorie in the executive suite was looking for in an executive VP—these are all skills that will be more common among people with higher IQ scores.Read more at location 2271
Note: IQ E RETI Edit
You know the game of Telephone: kids sit in a circle, the first person whispers a slightly complicated phrase such as “The kittens go to the vet at 5 p.m. Sunday” into the ear of the child on her right. That child whispers what he hears to the person on his right, and so on around the room, with small errors accumulating until the first kid is finally told “The kids go to the Fabian Soap Derby.” Corporations, government agencies, nonprofits—all are playing games of Telephone on a daily basis. Personally, I’d love to see a study of whether higher-IQ teams are better at Telephone than teams with average IQ.Read more at location 2277
Note: L IQ COME COSTRUTTORE DI RETI Edit
working memory is one of the better predictors of IQ,Read more at location 2282
Note: WORKING MEMORY cccc Edit
The results of such a study would matter for creating successful organizations. One of the great insights of sociology is that in most organizations, the informal networks matter as much as the formal organization chart: things get done because of healthy networks, healthy cultures, healthy information flows. Teams with high test scores tend to have the skills to create these cultures, networks, and flows.Read more at location 2283
Note: INFORMAL NETWORKS NELLE AZIONDE Edit
informal networks are like a campfire: every hot ember heats the other embers. Networks are yet another IQ multiplier.Read more at location 2287
Note: CONTAGIO Edit
Cheap TalkRead more at location 2289
Note: T Edit
when two people have more in common—perhaps they’re on the same football team, trying to win the FIFA World Cup—A will tend to speak clearly to B. When they have no common interests—perhaps they are strangers, or even nations at war—A will speak in gibberish to B.Read more at location 2302
Note: TEORIA DEL CHEAP TALK. Edit
Note: INTERESSI CONVERGENTI => CHIATEZZA Edit
Sobel and Crawford prove that even if two players have an infinitely large language at their disposal—infinite numbers or words or even multiple languages—a rational player A who shares only a partial common interest with his fellow player B will use only a partial set of the messages at his disposal. He’ll speak in a stilted language.Read more at location 2305
Note: CASO INTERMEDIO E CLICHÈ Edit
In the rich countries we see politicians talk this way all the time: there are only a few “policy stances” a senator can take, and she’s considered either a “moderate,” a “conservative,” or a “progressive” with maybe a handful of other options. Even though she might hold sophisticated, nuanced views on Shakespeare or the Qing dynasty or the best way to train for a marathon, once she switches to her role of senator the subtlety drains away and she is reduced to speaking in clichés. Part of the reason for speaking in clichés is because that’s what voters can most easily remember—voters pay little attention to politics most of the time, so branding is importantRead more at location 2308
Note: ESEMPIO DEI POLITICI. BRANDING Edit
Sobel and Crawford’s finding: when two people in any kind of short-run interaction have diverging interests, both sides know that any statement gets taken with a grain of saltRead more at location 2316
Note: INTERESSI DIVERGENTI. CODIOCE. INT CONVERGENTI SCHIETTEZZA Edit
But I want to push beyond the formal model to suggest that people with high average test scores are more likely to convert a game of conflict into a game of cooperation.Read more at location 2320
Note: ALTO IQ=>CODICI PIÙ FACILMENTE INTERPRETATI Edit
Two reasonably intelligent people getting divorced certainly face a zero-sum game when it comes to how they split up the retirement savings.Read more at location 2323
Note: ES DIVORZIO Edit
part of the power of memory, part of the power of being able to recall obscure facts, is the power to remember interests the couple still have in common: “Oh, there’s a day care right between our two houses,” “Here’s an investment company that doesn’t add on fees when we split our retirement plans in half,” “I read about a job online that might be a good fit for you.” There’s at least the opportunity to think win-win.Read more at location 2324
Note: c Edit
It’s that the memory skills and other traits that higher-IQ individuals tend to have are useful in searching out win-win possibilities,Read more at location 2329
Note: c Edit
Adam Smith’s Pin Factory: A Team EffortRead more at location 2332
Note: T Edit
first chapter of Adam Smith’s second book, The Wealth of Nations,Read more at location 2333
power of the division of labor,Read more at location 2335
Economists have reacted in different ways to Smith’s observation: Marx looked at the pin factory and saw workers alienated from the craft process, for instance. A second way to look at the pin factory is to see an O-ring process at work, in which one weak worker means you’re making pounds of shoddy pins each day. A third way is to see peer effects when a talented new worker ever so subtly inspires others to work just a little bit harder.Read more at location 2339
Note: REAZIONI ALLA SCOPERTA SMITHIANA DELLA SPEVIALIZZAZIONE NELLA FABBRICA DI SPILLI Edit
Production is a team effort, and teams with better-than-average memories, better-than-average social intelligence, and better-than-average job skills can become vastly more productive than even a slightly less-skilled team.Read more at location 2343
Note: TESI Edit