How a rebellious scientist (Lee Jussim) uncovered the left-wing bias of psychology
Citation (APA): jussim, l. (2018). How a rebellious scientist (Lee Jussim) uncovered the left-wing bias of psychology [Kindle Android version]. Retrieved from Amazon.com
Parte introduttiva
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 2
How a rebellious scientist (Lee Jussim) uncovered the left-wing bias of psychology By lee jussim
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 9
Left-wing bias, he said, was undermining his field.
Nota - Posizione 9
OPINIONE DI JUISSIM
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 12
faked the moon landing– therefore (climate) science is a hoax.”
Nota - Posizione 13
ES DI STUDIO PROBLEMATICO
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 14
those who believed that the moon landing was a hoax also believed that climate science was a fraud.
Nota - Posizione 14
ESEMPIO
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 19
out of 1145 participants, only ten agreed that the moon landing was a hoax!”
Nota - Posizione 20
TUTTAVIA...
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 20
97.8% who thought that climate science was a hoax, did not think that the moon landing also a hoax.”
Nota - Posizione 21
Ccccccccc
Nota - Posizione 24
GIUDIZIO
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 24
misrepresentations.
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 25
it was the lax attitude on behalf of peer reviewers– Jussim suggested– that was at the heart of the problems within social psychology.
Nota - Posizione 26
PROBLEMA PEER
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 29
those on the left outnumbered those on the right by a ratio of about 10: 1.
Nota - Posizione 29
RATIO
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 44
Instead of finding that the teachers’ expectations influenced the students’ performances, he found that the students’ performances influenced the teachers’ expectations.
Nota - Posizione 45
PRIMO ESITO DEGLI STUDI DI JUSSIM...NO STEREOTIPO=>REALTÀ MA REALTÀ=>STEREOTIPO
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 47
It did not show that stereotypes became self-fulfilling prophecies.
Nota - Posizione 47
Cccccccc
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 49
the results of the Reproducibility Project in psychology were announced.
Nota - Posizione 50
ALTRO INDIZIO DI UNA SCIENZA PIENA DI BIAS
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 51
only about 30%-50% could be replicated.
Nota - Posizione 51
SI 100
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 55
students were divided into two groups: one group received priming with the stereotype of elderly people; the other students received no priming (the control group). When the students left the experiment, those who had been primed with the stereotype of the elderly, walked down a corridor significantly more slowly than the students assigned to the control.
Nota - Posizione 57
STUDIO NN REPLICATO
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 59
people applied a stereotype about social class when they saw a young girl taking a math test, but did not when they saw a young girl not taking a math test.
Nota - Posizione 60
ALTRO ESEMPIO NN REPLICATO
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 72
Stereotypes are simply beliefs about a group of people.
Nota - Posizione 72
DEF
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 73
When stereotypes are defined as beliefs about groups of people (true or untrue), they correlate with real world criteria with effect sizes ranging from .4 to .9, with the average coming in somewhere around .8.
Nota - Posizione 74
CORRELAZIONE CON LA REALTÀ
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 77
stereotypes accurately predict demographic criteria, academic achievement, personality and behaviour.
Nota - Posizione 78
SCOPERTA
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 78
One area of stereotyping which is consistently found to be inaccurate are the stereotypes concerning political affiliation; right-wingers and left wingers tend to caricature each others
Nota - Posizione 79
DOVE LO STEREOTIPO FALSIFICA
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 81
people tend to switch off some of their stereotypes– especially the descriptive ones– when they interact with individuals.
Nota - Posizione 82
ALTRA SCOPEETA
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 82
stereotypes are a crutch to lean on when we have no other information
Nota - Posizione 83
DI FATTO...FUNZIONE DELLO STEREOTIPO
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 85
A Cool Reception
Nota - Posizione 85
Tttttttt
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 88
Gordon Allport, a mentor of Stanley Milgram, conceptualised stereotypes in his 1954 book The Nature of Prejudice as inaccurate, pernicious and unshakeable, and influential in shaping the social world9.
Nota - Posizione 90
L ORTODOSSIA
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 94
“Social psychologists should not be studying whether people are accurate in perceiving groups! They should be studying how situations create disadvantage.”
Nota - Posizione 95
LA REAZIONE FREDDA AI LAVORI DI JUSSIM
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 98
“the promotion of social justice” as a research topic
Nota - Posizione 98
STRANO MA VERO
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 100
the blending of science with political activism
Nota - Posizione 100
SEMPRE PIÙ COMUNE
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 101
scientists are often in practice of tweeting about “white privilege”, “women in STEM”, “structural disadvantage”, “affirmative action”, and “stereotypes”.
Nota - Posizione 102
LO SI VEDE TUTTI I GIORNI
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 102
the crusade to change the world
Nota - Posizione 102
NEL RETROPENSIERO
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 105
for renegade academics such as Jussim to get published, they often must resort to sugar-coating and camouflaging
Nota - Posizione 106
STRATEGIE DI SOORAVVIVENZA
Evidenzia ( giallo) - Posizione 108
Jussim also points out that while doing research that breaks taboos and undermines political narratives is hard, it is not impossible. Ultimately the scientific method wins.
Nota - Posizione 110
LIETO FINE
