mercoledì 10 agosto 2016

The American Dream Isn’t Alive in Denmark james heckman

Notebook per
The American Dream Isn’t Alive in Denmark
james heckman
Citation (APA): heckman, j. (2016). The American Dream Isn’t Alive in Denmark [Kindle Android version]. Retrieved from

Parte introduttiva
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 2
The American Dream Isn’t Alive in Denmark By james heckman
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 11
The standard social mobility statistic measures how much each generation's income is determined by its parents' income. By that measure, northern Europe and Scandinavia have the highest social mobility in the advanced world, and Denmark tops the list.
Nota - Posizione 13
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 13
But this Danish Dream is a “Scandinavian Fantasy,” according to a new paper by Rasmus Landersø at the Rockwool Foundation Research Unit in Copenhagen and James J. Heckman at the University of Chicago. Low-income Danish kids are not much more likely to earn a middle-class wage than their American counterparts. What’s more, the children of non-college graduates in Denmark are about as unlikely to attend college as their American counterparts.
Nota - Posizione 15
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 17
If that’s true, how does Denmark rank number-one among all rich countries in social mobility? It’s all about what happens after wages: The country’s high taxes on the rich and income transfers to the poor “compress” economic inequality within each generation:
Nota - Posizione 18
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 21
Its high social mobility is not the result of an economy that is uniquely good at helping poor children earn middle-class salaries. Instead, it is a country much like the U.S.,
Nota - Posizione 23
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 23
Social mobility in Denmark and the U.S. seem to be remarkably similar when looking exclusively at wages— that
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 28
The second big idea in the paper is that Denmark’s large investment in public education pays off in higher cognitive skills among low-income children, but not in higher-education mobility— i.e.,
Nota - Posizione 30
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 35
a tiny share of Denmark’s college graduate population comes from homes where neither parent finished high school.
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 37
The third big idea is that Denmark’s welfare policies might reduce its citizens’ incentives to go to college.
Nota - Posizione 38
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 40
Denmark makes it more comfortable to be poor and less lucrative to be rich, so many young people decide to end their education after high school.
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 41
Democrats can say: Despite conservative arguments that a welfare state could destroy poor young people’s ambition, Denmark’s educational mobility is no worse than the U.S. But Republicans can say: Despite liberal arguments that Denmark is so much better than the U.S. at social mobility, its poor kids are no more likely to go to college. “There is something here for the Republicans and for the Democrats,” Heckman told me.
Nota - Posizione 44
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 45
Equality of opportunity is a fantasy. It does not exist in the U.S., it does not exist in Denmark, and it probably doesn’t exist anywhere.
Nota - Posizione 46
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 48
For the government to make equality of opportunity its singular and absolute policy goal would probably mean breaking up neighborhoods, forcing arranged marriages, enrolling all children in a unified curriculum, and having them all taught by a mass-produced robot; that would eliminate neighborhood effects, assortative mating, peer effects, curricular differences, and the problem of unequal teaching quality.
Nota - Posizione 50
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 60
But the U.S. mythology of social mobility is also self-defeating,
Nota - Posizione 61