giovedì 26 gennaio 2017

Media Slant A Question of Cause and Effect GREGORY MANKIW

Notebook per
Media Slant A Question of Cause and Effect
GREGORY MANKIW
Citation (APA): MANKIW, G. (2014). Media Slant A Question of Cause and Effect [Kindle Android version]. Retrieved from Amazon.com

Parte introduttiva
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 1
Media Slant: A Question of Cause and Effect By N. GREGORY MANKIW
Nota - Posizione 1
t
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 3
ideological spin.
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 3
the root cause
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 4
Mathew Gentzkow,
Nota - Posizione 4
PROAGONISYA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 6
John Bates Clark Medal
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 7
understanding of the economics of the media
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 9
studied the political slant of more than 400 daily newspapers
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 10
measure the slant
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 10
no easy task.
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 12
objective measurement,
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 13
Mr. Gentzkow and Mr. Shapiro went to the Congressional Record and used a computer algorithm to find phrases that were particularly associated with the rhetoric of politicians of the two major political parties.
Nota - Posizione 15
x FRASARIO POLITICO
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 15
Democrats were more likely than Republicans to use phrases like “minimum wage,” “oil and gas companies” and “wildlife refuge.” Republicans more often referred to “tax relief,” “private property rights” and “economic growth.” While Democrats were more likely to mention Rosa Parks, Republicans were more likely to mention the Grand Ole Opry.
Nota - Posizione 17
x ES
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 19
the researchers then analyzed newspaper articles
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 21
To confirm the validity of their measure, Mr. Gentzkow and Mr. Shapiro showed that it was correlated with results from subjective surveys of readers.
Nota - Posizione 22
x CONFERMA A RINFORZO
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 25
researchers then analyzed its determinants.
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 27
A natural hypothesis is that a media outlet’s perspective reflects the ideology of its owner.
Nota - Posizione 27
x PRIMA IPOTESI. CI SI ALLINEA ALL EDITORE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 30
little evidence to support
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 31
two newspapers with the same owner are no more likely to be ideologically similar than two random papers.
Nota - Posizione 31
c
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 34
They find that potential customers are crucial.
Nota - Posizione 35
CONTA IL CONSUMATORE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 35
If a paper serves a liberal community, it is likely to lean left, and if it serves a conservative community, it is likely to lean right.
Nota - Posizione 36
x CONSUMATORE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 37
They find that in regions where a high percentage of the population attends church regularly, there are more conservatives, and newspapers have a conservative slant.
Nota - Posizione 39
x ESEMPIO
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 39
causation runs from the community’s politics to the newspaper’s
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 40
The bottom line is simple: Media owners generally do not try to mold the population to their own brand of politics. Instead, like other business owners, they maximize profit by giving customers what they want.
Nota - Posizione 42
x CONCLUSIONE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 44
How likely is it that we as citizens will change our minds, or reach compromise with those who have differing views, if all of us are getting our news from sources that reinforce the opinions we start with?
Nota - Posizione 45
x DOMANDA INWUIETAMTE