mercoledì 29 marzo 2017

Addressing the Problems that Lead to Prison james wilson

Addressing the Problems that Lead to Prison james wilson
riccardo-mariani@libero.it
Citation (APA): riccardo-mariani@libero.it. (2017). Addressing the Problems that Lead to Prison james wilson [Kindle Android version]. Retrieved from Amazon.com

Parte introduttiva
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 1
Addressing the Problems that Lead to Prison By James Q. Wilson
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 7
large fraction of our citizens,
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 9
a nation of “racist jailers”
Nota - Posizione 9
PER ALCUNI
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 9
“greed-driven economy”
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 10
“so-called underclass”
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 11
net benefits to ‘society’ of greater incarceration.”
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 13
Let me summarize what Daniel Nagin, David Farrington, Patrick Langan, Steven Levitt, and William Spelman have shown. Other things being equal, a higher risk of punishment reduces crime rates.
Nota - Posizione 14
PURTROPPO IL CARCERE FUNZIONA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 19
the results of prison in America: It helps explain why this country has a lower rate of burglary than Australia, Austria, Canada, England, Germany, and the Netherlands, and a lower rate of auto theft than Australia, Austria, Canada, England, and Sweden. On the other hand, America’s homicide rate remains much higher than in those nations. America is more punitive, but except for homicide, it is also safer.
Nota - Posizione 21
EFFETTO DEL CARCERE USA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 23
The key moral and political question is whether our greater personal safety is worth our greater use of prison.
Nota - Posizione 23
LA QUESTIONE MORALE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 25
Racism exists here, but it cannot account for the fact that the racial identity of people who commit assaults and robberies is almost exactly the same as the racial identity of people who go to prison for those crimes.
Nota - Posizione 27
RAZZISMO? NO
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 30
why blacks
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 31
My research, like that of Orlando Patterson and others, suggests that slavery and Reconstruction deeply harmed African American culture by making intact families rare and denying to black victims the same degree of police protection that was afforded to whites.
Nota - Posizione 32
WHY BLACK?
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 33
many black children have grown up in father-absent families.
Nota - Posizione 34
c
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 36
imprisonment for African Americans is a wake up call for our historical failure to incorporate them into a functioning and constructive culture.
Nota - Posizione 37
c
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 39
the gains, on the average, are small: recidivism rates are reduced by about 10 percent. Since two-thirds of all ex-cons commits a new offense within three years, a 10 percent reduction is not very much.
Nota - Posizione 41
RIABILITAZIONE? FUNZIONA POCO
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 41
If we knew how to make street gangs less attractive
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 44
The best approach is to invest in crime prevention programs aimed at young children. Careful evaluations show that such efforts exist. They include the Perry Pre-School program, nurse home visitations, various parent-child training programs, and certain school-based programs.
Nota - Posizione 46
INVESTIRE SUI PICCOLI
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 48
many of the best prevention programs cost a lot of money for each child,
Nota - Posizione 49
PROBLEMA COSTI
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 51
the programs that work are typically small, intense efforts that may or may not work if they are scaled up to be state-wide
Nota - Posizione 52
PROBLEMA SCALE UP
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 52
Third, good programs often lose out to bad ones because the latter, though equally devoted to prevention, lack supportive evidence but have political muscle.
Nota - Posizione 53
PROBLEMA DISTORSIONI POLITICHE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 63
Talk about Policy, Please
Nota - Posizione 63
t
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 68
Glenn Loury acknowledges that imprisonment in America reduces crime but dislikes imprisonment despite this. I look forward to learning what he would put in its place. If it is rehabilitation, I hope he will explain what rehabilitative programs exist that can reduce recidivism by more than small amounts.
Nota - Posizione 69
RIABILITAZIONE INEFFICACE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 72
ignore policy,
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 74
Punishment versus Probation By James Q. Wilson
Nota - Posizione 77
t
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 79
post-prison employment programs have only a small effect on recidivism, but he defends them by saying that prison also has only a modest effect on recidivism. He is correct, but he neglects the deterrent effect of prison
Nota - Posizione 79
LAVORO. POCO EFFICACE
Nota - Posizione 80
ALLORA MEGLIO IL CARCERE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 82
prison also has a retributive effect: people, especially victims of crime, want the wrongdoer to be punished.
Nota - Posizione 83
PRIGIONE HA ANCHE EFFETTO RETRIBUTIVO
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 86
Retribution’s Legitimacy By James Q. Wilson
Nota - Posizione 90
t
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 102
Suppose a woman has been raped. Would she be satisfied with sending the rapist to an employment program? I doubt it.
Nota - Posizione 103
RETRIBUZ