75 NATURAL ASSETS AND ARBITRARINESS Anarchy, State, and Utopia by Robert Nozick

75  NATURAL ASSETS AND ARBITRARINESS Anarchy, State, and Utopia by Robert Nozick - tuttoèfortunaeladignità? unalinearischiosa ilrigettodellalibertà

NATURAL ASSETS AND ARBITRARINESSRead more at location 4191

Note: 75@@@@@@@@@@@ Edit

Here we have Rawls’ reason for rejecting a system of natural liberty: it “permits” distributive shares to be improperly influenced by factors that are so arbitrary from a moral point of view. These factors are: “prior distribution . . . of natural talents and abilities as these have been developed over time by social circumstances and such chance contingencies as accident and good fortune.”Read more at location 4208

Note: IL NEMICO DI RAWLS: LA FORTUNA. PER QS RAWLS RIFIUTA LA LIBERTÀ Edit

Notice that there is no mention at all of how persons have chosen to develop their own natural assets.Read more at location 4211

Note: COME SI SFRUTTANO I TALENTI? Edit

Why is that simply left out? Perhaps because such choices also are viewed as being the products of factors outside the person’s control,Read more at location 4212

Note: C È FORTUNA ANCHE QUI Edit

denigrating a person’s autonomy and prime responsibility for his actions is a risky lineRead more at location 4221

Note: UNA LINEA RISCHIOSA CHE NN SI CONIUGA CON LA DIGNITÀ UMANA Edit

especially for a theory that founds so much (including a theory of the good) upon persons’ choices.Read more at location 4222

Add a note

and rests upon can be made to fit together with the view of human dignityRead more at location 4223

Add a note

(Rawls’ chart on page 124 listing the conceptions of justice considered in the original position does not include the system of natural liberty.)Read more at location 4229

Note: RAWLS ESCLUDE LA LIBERTÀ Edit

Rawls does not state why persons in the original position who considered the system of natural liberty would reject it.Read more at location 4231

Note: PERCHÈ RIGETTARE LA LIBERTÀ IN P.O.? BOH