4. The Self-Torturer Michael Huemer1
Note:4@@@@@@@@@
Note:4@@@@@@@@@
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,200
4.1 The Paradox
Note:Tttttttttttt
Note:Tttttttttttt
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,200
You have been fitted with an unobtrusive torture device, which will be attached to you for the rest of your life.
Note:UN CCILICIO COM 1000 TACCHE...PASSARE DA ZERO A 1000 TI UCCIDE MA ALZARE DI UNA TACCA NN TI FA NULLA
Note:UN CCILICIO COM 1000 TACCHE...PASSARE DA ZERO A 1000 TI UCCIDE MA ALZARE DI UNA TACCA NN TI FA NULLA
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,202
At setting 1, the device applies a very slight electric current to the pain center in your brain.
Note:CHE FA
Note:CHE FA
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,203
At setting 2, it applies a very slightly higher electric current. And so
Note:Ccccccccc
Note:Ccccccccc
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,206
However, by the time you get up to setting 1,000, you are in severe pain.
Note:cccccccccccc
Note:cccccccccccc
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,208
If you turn it up by one, you will be given $10,000. You can never turn the dial down
Note:L OFFERTA GIORNALIERA
Note:L OFFERTA GIORNALIERA
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,209
Should you turn the dial up on day one?
Note:LA DOMANDA (RIPETUTA)
Note:LA DOMANDA (RIPETUTA)
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,209
“If I turn the dial up just one setting, I won’t even notice the difference. However, I will have an additional $10,000, which is a significant and very noticeable benefit.
Note:COME RAGIONO
Note:COME RAGIONO
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,212
the same reasoning applies every day.
Note:Cccccccccc
Note:Cccccccccc
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,212
at the end of 1,000 days, you have made $10 million, and you are condemned to spend the rest of your life in agony.
Note:FINALE
Note:FINALE
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,215
How is it possible that by making the correct choice at every stage,
Note:INSPIEGABILE
Note:INSPIEGABILE
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,216
This case might also be taken to illustrate how the “better than” relation can be intransitive.
Note:SE A È MEGLIO DI B E B È MEGLIO DI C ALLORA A È MKEGLIO DI C....CONFUTAZIONE
Note:SE A È MEGLIO DI B E B È MEGLIO DI C ALLORA A È MKEGLIO DI C....CONFUTAZIONE
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,219
for each n, it is better to go to setting n+1
Note:INFATTI
Note:INFATTI
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,223
You like potato chips, but you do not want to become overweight. You pick up chip #1 and consider whether to eat it. If you eat it, you will experience a noticeable pleasure attributable to that particular chip.
Note:UN CASO CONCRETO
Note:UN CASO CONCRETO
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,231
it would be nice to have a solution that explains why this scenario does not truly exhibit intransitivity of betterness
Note:COSA CI ASPETTIAMO DALLA SOLUZIONE
Note:COSA CI ASPETTIAMO DALLA SOLUZIONE
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,233
4.2 Quinn’s Solution
Note:Ttttttttttttt
Note:Ttttttttttttt
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,234
Warren Quinn proposes that the self-torturer should try focusing his attention on some proper subset of all the settings of the device –
Note:DA 0 a 200 DA 200 a 400...TRA I SUB C È TRANSITIVITÀ MA ALL INTERNO
Note:DA 0 a 200 DA 200 a 400...TRA I SUB C È TRANSITIVITÀ MA ALL INTERNO
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,252
Preference Consistency: If one has a choice between A and B, and one rationally prefers A to B, it is rational to choose A.
Note:NOZIONE ELEMENTARE
Note:NOZIONE ELEMENTARE
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,253
Strategy Consistency:
Note:MA C È OL ALTERNATIVA
Note:MA C È OL ALTERNATIVA
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,255
Quinn holds that we should reject Preference Consistency because, in the case of the self-torturer on day 201, Preference Consistency conflicts with Strategy Consistency.
Note:TESI QUINN
Note:TESI QUINN
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,259
I think Preference Consistency is a self-evident principle
Note:QUINN NN CONVINE
Note:QUINN NN CONVINE
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,264
4.3 An Orthodox Solution
Note:tttttttttttt
Note:tttttttttttt
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,264
4.3.1 In Defense of Undetectable Changes
Note:Tttttttttt
Note:Tttttttttt
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,267
it is possible for there to be changes in a person’s conscious experience too small to be introspectively detected.
Note:ASSUNTO
Note:ASSUNTO
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,268
there could be two pains so similar to each other that
Note:Cccccccccccc
Note:Cccccccccccc
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,269
Something analogous is certainly true of observable physical properties.
Note:IL PIÙ CALDO?…IL PIÙ GRANDE?… IMPOSSIBILE DIRE
Note:IL PIÙ CALDO?…IL PIÙ GRANDE?… IMPOSSIBILE DIRE
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,271
nevertheless, one might in fact be larger,
Note:Ccccccccccccc
Note:Ccccccccccccc
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,273
one might claim, if two pain sensations feel to us the same, then ipso facto they are exactly the same.
Note:MA I SENTIMENTI NN SONO OGGETTI
Note:MA I SENTIMENTI NN SONO OGGETTI
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,276
This argument cannot be correct;
Note:È NECESSARIO RESPINGERE QS OBIEZIONE
Note:È NECESSARIO RESPINGERE QS OBIEZIONE
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,309
self-torturer scenario just entails that there can be undetectable but real differences in one’s experiences.
Note:A CHE SERVE IL PARADOSSO...REALTÀ E XCEZIONE
Note:A CHE SERVE IL PARADOSSO...REALTÀ E XCEZIONE
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,310
Note that we are not here positing unconscious pains.
Note:L ERRORE DA NN FARE
Note:L ERRORE DA NN FARE
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,313
4.3.2 Indeterminacy
Note:Ttttttttttttt
Note:Ttttttttttttt
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,315
“But the measure of the self-torturer’s discomfort,” says Quinn , “is indeterminate.
Note:LA RISPOSTA DI QUINN A HUEMER
Note:LA RISPOSTA DI QUINN A HUEMER
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,321
He is proposing that there are pains that fail to have any specific intensity.
Note:TRADUZIONE
Note:TRADUZIONE
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,326
His view would have to be that pains have intensity, but they do not have any specific intensity.
Note:ALTRA VERSIONE
Note:ALTRA VERSIONE
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,342
I think he is saying that for any given pain, there are certain intensities such that it is neither true nor false that the pain has them.
Note:RITRADUZIONE DI QUINN
Note:RITRADUZIONE DI QUINN
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,345
This is a contradiction. To say that x neither has nor fails to have q, where q is some property,
Note:VIOLATA LA BIVALENZA
Note:VIOLATA LA BIVALENZA
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,349
Similarly, to say that it is neither true nor false that x has q is to say that “x has q” isn’t true and “x has q” isn’t false.
Note:OVVERO
Note:OVVERO
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,354
4.3.3 In Defense of an Optimal Setting
Note:Tttttttttttttttt
Note:Tttttttttttttttt
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,365
for each n, the self-torturer should assume that turning up the dial from n to n+1 is one thousandth as bad (in terms of pain) as turning the dial from 0 to 1000.
Note:LA POSIZIONE PIÙ COERENTE
Note:LA POSIZIONE PIÙ COERENTE
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,370
Unlike pleasure and pain, money has diminishing marginal value .
Note:E CHE DIRE DEI 10000
Note:E CHE DIRE DEI 10000
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,379
Optimal stopping point for the self-torturer
Note:LA DECISIONE RAZIONALE È POSSIBILE...VEDI GRAFICO
Note:LA DECISIONE RAZIONALE È POSSIBILE...VEDI GRAFICO
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,422
4.3.4 Detectable and Undetectable Values
Note:Ttttttttttttttt
Note:Ttttttttttttttt
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,427
I am not at all convinced that the benefit of $10,000 remains significant or even noticeable as one’s wealth expands up to $10 million.
Note:ALTRO ELEMENTO
Note:ALTRO ELEMENTO
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,444
4.3.5 Advantages of This Solution
Note:Ttttttttttt
Note:Ttttttttttt
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,447
My treatment, though faithful to the factual (non-evaluative) stipulations of the scenario, does not involve any intransitivity, either of the better-than relation, or of rational preferences.
Note:PRIMO VANTAGGIO
Note:PRIMO VANTAGGIO
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,453
My treatment of the case does not violate classical logic.
Note:SECONDO VANTAGGIO....NN IMPLICA INDETERMINAZIONE
Note:SECONDO VANTAGGIO....NN IMPLICA INDETERMINAZIONE
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,455
My treatment of the case maintains standard principles of decision theory, including the axiom that, when given a choice between two options, one of which is rationally preferred to the other, one ought to take the preferred option.
Note:TERZO
Note:TERZO
Yellow highlight | Location: 2,461
there can be unnoticeable facts about the qualitative character of conscious mental states.
L UNICO NCONVENIENTE
L UNICO NCONVENIENTE