mercoledì 15 febbraio 2017

3 Why Do Drug Dealers Still Live with Their Moms? Freakonomics Rev Ed: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything by Steven D. Levitt, Stephen J. Dubner

 by Steven D. Levitt, Stephen J. Dubner
You have 241 highlighted passages
You have 139 notes
Last annotated on February 15, 2017
2 How Is the Ku Klux Klan Like a Group of Real-Estate Agents?Read more at location 799
Note: 4@@@@@@ Edit
3 Why Do Drug Dealers Still Live with Their Moms?Read more at location 1263
Note: 3@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Edit
The media eagerly glommed on to this story, portraying crack dealing as one of the most profitable jobs in America.Read more at location 1320
Note: LO SPACCIATORE RICCONE. CONVENZIONE Edit
not only did most of the crack dealers still live in the projects, but most of them still lived at home with their moms.Read more at location 1322
Note: X MA XCHÈ ABITANO CON LA MAMMA NELLE CASE POPOLARI? Edit
Sudhir Venkatesh—Read more at location 1328
born in India,Read more at location 1328
raised in the suburbs of upstate New YorkRead more at location 1328
graduated from the University of CaliforniaRead more at location 1329
degree in mathematics.Read more at location 1329
PhD in sociology at the University of Chicago.Read more at location 1330
how young people form their identities;Read more at location 1330
spent three months following the Grateful Dead around the country.Read more at location 1331
His assignment: to visit Chicago’s poorest black neighborhoods with a clipboard and a seventy-question, multiple-choice survey. This was the first question on the survey: How do you feel about being black and poor?         a. Very bad         b. Bad         c. Neither bad nor good         d. Somewhat good         e. Very goodRead more at location 1333
Note: X L INDAGINE ORIGINARIA Edit
buildings were condemned, practically abandoned.Read more at location 1342
Some families lived on the lower floors, pirating water and electricity,Read more at location 1342
elevators didn’t work.Read more at location 1343
he startled a group of teenagers shooting dice.Read more at location 1346
turned out to be a gang of junior-level crack dealersRead more at location 1346
they were not happy to see him.Read more at location 1347
“Fuck you, nigger, what are you doing in our stairwell?”Read more at location 1349
Note: x REAZIONE Edit
There was an ongoing gang war in Chicago.Read more at location 1350
This gang, a branch of the Black Gangster Disciple Nation,Read more at location 1350
The gang members started arguing over what should be done with Venkatesh. Let him go?Read more at location 1355
“Let me have him, let me have him.”Read more at location 1357
The crowd grew bigger and louder. Then an older gang member appeared.Read more at location 1358
Note: x VECCHIO SAGGIO Edit
he realized that the multiple-choice answers A through E were insufficient. In reality, he now knew, the answers should have looked like this:         a. Very bad         b. Bad         c. Neither bad nor good         d. Somewhat good         e. Very good         f. Fuck youRead more at location 1364
Note: LA SCELTA MULTIPLA NN BASTA Edit
Note: x OPZIONE F Edit
another man appeared. This was J. T., the gang’s leader.Read more at location 1371
said he couldn’t answer the question because he wasn’t black.Read more at location 1372
“I ain’t no African American either, you idiot. I’m a nigger.”Read more at location 1374
Note: NEGRO Edit
Venkatesh would occasionally try to discuss his survey, but the young crack dealers just laughed and told him how stupid his questions were.Read more at location 1382
Note: STUPIDO QUESTIONARIO X Edit
It struck Venkatesh that most people, including himself, had never given much thought to the daily life of ghetto criminals. He was now eager to learn how the Black Disciples worked, from top to bottom.Read more at location 1384
Note: DAILY LIFE Edit
As it happened, J. T. was a college graduate himself, a business major. After college, he had taken a job in the Loop, working in the marketing department of a company that sold office equipment. But he felt so out of place there—like a white man working at Afro Sheen headquarters, he liked to say—that he quit. Still, he never forgot what he learned. He knew the importance of collecting data and finding new markets; he was always on the lookout for better management strategies. It was no coincidence, in other words, that J. T. was the leader of this crack gang. He was bred to be a boss.Read more at location 1389
Note: BANDITI LAUREATI Edit
Note: RAZIONALITÀ DEI BOSS X Edit
J. T. promised Venkatesh unfettered access to the gang’s operationsRead more at location 1394
For the next six years, Venkatesh practically lived there. Under J. T.’s protection he watched the gang members up close, at work and at home.Read more at location 1397
Note: EMBEDDED Edit
“It’s a war out here, man,”Read more at location 1399
people struggling to survive,Read more at location 1399
watched a woman use her baby’s bib to sop up the blood of a teenaged drug dealer who was shotRead more at location 1402
Booty,Read more at location 1405
Note: ... Edit
came to Venkatesh with a story.Read more at location 1405
He handed Venkatesh a stack of well-worn spiral notebooks—blue and black, the gang’s colors. They represented a complete record of four years’ worth of the gang’s financial transactions. At J. T.’s direction, the ledgers had been rigorously compiled: sales, wages, dues, even the death benefits paid out to the families of murdered members.Read more at location 1409
Note: CONTABILITÀ X Edit
Sudhir Venkatesh told Steven Levitt about the spiral notebooksRead more at location 1422
It would be the first time that such priceless financial data had fallen into an economist’s hands, affording an analysis of a heretofore uncharted criminal enterprise.Read more at location 1422
Note: I DATI A LEVITT Edit
So how did the gang work? An awful lot like most American businesses, actually, though perhaps none more so than McDonald’s. In fact, if you were to hold a McDonald’s organizational chart and a Black Disciples org chart side by side, you could hardly tell the difference.Read more at location 1424
Note: GANG E MC DONALD X Edit
J. T. paid the board of directors nearly 20 percent of his revenues for the right to sell crack in a designated twelve-square-block area. The rest of the money was his to distribute as he saw fit. Three officers reported directly to J. T.: an enforcer (who ensured the gang members’ safety), a treasurer (who watched over the gang’s liquid assets), and a runner (who transported large quantities of drugs and money to and from the supplier). Beneath the officers were the street-level salesmen known as foot soldiers.Read more at location 1430
Note: X SCALA DEGLI STIPENDI. ALLOCAZIONE DELLE RISORSE Edit
The goal of a foot soldier was to someday become an officer.Read more at location 1434
(autumn was the best crack-selling season; summer and Christmastime were slow)Read more at location 1435
At the very bottom of J. T.’s organization were as many as two hundred members known as the rank and file. They were not employees at all. They did, however, pay dues to the gang—some for protection from rival gangs, others for the chance to eventually earn a job as a foot soldier.Read more at location 1437
Note: x IN FONDO Edit
crack boom,Read more at location 1440
business was excellent.Read more at location 1440
T.’s franchise quadrupledRead more at location 1440
In the first year, it took in an average of $18,500 each month; by the final year, it was collecting $68,400 a month.Read more at location 1441
Note: x BOSS Edit
The gang did allow some rank-and-file members to sell heroin on its turf but accepted a fixed licensing fee in lieu of a share of profits.Read more at location 1444
Note: AUTONOMI X Edit
The extortionary taxes were paid by other businesses that operated on the gang’s turf, including grocery stores, gypsy cabs, pimps, and people selling stolen goods or repairing cars on the street.Read more at location 1446
Note: TASSE Edit
Mercenary fighters were nonmembers hired on short-term contracts to help the gang fight turf wars.Read more at location 1450
Note: MERCENARI Edit
The miscellaneous expenses include legal fees, parties, bribes, and gang-sponsored “community events.”Read more at location 1452
Note: VARIE Edit
worked hard to be seen as a pillar rather than a scourgeRead more at location 1453
The gang not only paid for the funeral but often gave a stipend of up to three years’ wages to the victim’s family.Read more at location 1454
Note: PENSIONE E WELFARE . TENDENZA NATURALE A FARSI STATO Edit
“That’s a fucking stupid question,” he was told, “’cause as long as you been with us, you still don’t understand that their families is our families. We can’t just leave ’em out. We been knowing these folks our whole lives, man,Read more at location 1455
Note: x PERCHÈ SONO TANTO GENEROSI? COMUNITÀ Edit
You got to respect the family.”Read more at location 1457
Note: c Edit
another reasonRead more at location 1458
gang feared community backlashRead more at location 1458
Here is the single line item in the gang’s budget that made J. T. the happiest:   Net monthly profit accruing to leader   $8,500   At $8,500 per month, J. T.’s annual salary was about $100,000—tax-free, of course, and not including the various off-the-books money he pocketed.Read more at location 1460
Note: 8500 AL MESE Edit
And J. T. was just one of roughly 100 leaders at this level within the Black Disciples network.Read more at location 1464
gang’s board of directors,Read more at location 1466
Each of those top 20 bosses stood to earn about $500,000 a year.Read more at location 1466
Note: I BOSS Edit
(A third of them, however, were typically imprisonedRead more at location 1466
So the top 120 men on the Black Disciples’ pyramid were paid very well.Read more at location 1468
But the pyramid they sat atop was gigantic.Read more at location 1468
Note: PIRAMIDE A BASE LARGA. SI STA BENE SOLO IN CIMA Edit
there were some 5,300 other men working for those 120 bosses. Then there were another 20,000 unpaid rank-and-file members, many of whom wanted nothing more than an opportunity to become a foot soldier.Read more at location 1469
Note: x LA BASE Edit
J. T.’s hourly wage was $66. His three officers, meanwhile, each took home $700 a month, which works out to about $7 an hour. And the foot soldiers earned just $3.30 an hour, less than the minimum wage. So the answer to the original question—if drug dealers make so much money, why are they still living with their mothers?—is that, except for the top cats, they don’t make much money.Read more at location 1474
Note: IMPIEGATI: 700 MESE Edit
Note: SOLDATI: 3 EURO L ORA Edit
Note: RISPOSTA ALLA DOMANDA INIZIALE : STIPENDI DA FAME Edit
For every big earner, there were hundreds more just scraping along.Read more at location 1478
In other words, a crack gang works pretty much like the standard capitalist enterprise: you have to be near the top of the pyramid to make a big wage.Read more at location 1480
Note: GANG COME MULTINAZIONALE Edit
Notwithstanding the leadership’s rhetoric about the family nature of the business, the gang’s wages are about as skewed as wages in corporate America. A foot soldier had plenty in common with a McDonald’s burger flipper or a Wal-Mart shelf stocker.Read more at location 1481
In fact, most of J. T.’s foot soldiers also held minimum-wage jobs in the legitimate sector to supplement their skimpy illicit earnings.Read more at location 1482
Note: DOPPIO LAVORO Edit
“You got all these niggers below you who want your job, you dig?” he said. “So, you know, you try to take care of them, but you know, you also have to show them you the boss. You always have to get yours first, or else you really ain’t no leader. If you start taking losses, they see you as weak and shit.”Read more at location 1484
Note: x PERCHÈ NN SI PAGANO DI PIÙ? RISPOSTA DI UN LEADER Edit
soldiers faced terrible job conditions.Read more at location 1487
For starters, they had to stand on a street corner all day and do business with crackheads. (The gang members were strongly advised against using the product themselves, advice that was enforced by beatings if necessary.) Foot soldiers also risked arrest and, more worrisome, violence.Read more at location 1487
Note: x CONDIZIONI DI LAVORO Edit
A 1-in-4 chance of being killed! Compare these odds with those for a timber cutter, which the Bureau of Labor Statistics calls the most dangerous job in the United States. Over four years’ time, a timber cutter would stand only a 1-in-200 chance of being killed.Read more at location 1496
Note: x INAIL DELLA BANDA PREMIO ASTRONOMICO Edit
compare the crack dealer’s odds to those of a death-row inmate in Texas, which executes more prisoners than any other state. In 2003, Texas put to death twenty-four inmates—or just 5 percent of the nearly 500 inmates on its death row during that time. Which means that you stand a greater chance of dying while dealing crack in a Chicago housing project than you do while sitting on death row in Texas.Read more at location 1497
Note: x PEGGIO CHE IL BRACCIO DELLA MORTE Edit
why on earth would anyone take such a job?Read more at location 1502
Well, for the same reason that a pretty Wisconsin farm girl moves to Hollywood.Read more at location 1502
Note: PERCHÈ FARLO? HOLLYWOOD Edit
They all want to succeed in an extremely competitive field in which, if you reach the top, you are paid a fortuneRead more at location 1503
Note: c TENTARE LA FORTUNA Edit
To the kids growing up in a housing project on Chicago’s south side, crack dealing seemed like a glamour profession.Read more at location 1505
Note: GLAMOUR Edit
Fifty-six percent of the neighborhood’s children lived below the poverty line (compared to a national average of 18 percent). Seventy-eight percent came from single-parent homes. Fewer than 5 percent of the neighborhood’s adults had a college degree; barely one in three adult men worked at all. The neighborhood’s median income was about $15,000 a year,Read more at location 1508
Note: x ALTRA RAGIONE POVERTÀ. IL QUARTIERE Edit
The problem with crack dealing is the same as in every other glamour profession: a lot of people are competing for a very few prizes.Read more at location 1513
Note: INCONVENIENTE DEL GLAMOUR Edit
These budding drug lords bumped up against an immutable law of labor: when there are a lot of people willing and able to do a job, that job generally doesn’t pay well. This is one of four meaningful factors that determine a wage. The others are the specialized skills a job requires, the unpleasantness of a job, and the demand for services that the job fulfills. The delicate balance between these factors helps explain why, for instance, the typical prostitute earns more than the typical architect.Read more at location 1517
Note: LEGG DEL LAVORO Edit
Note: I 4 FATTORI DEL LAVORO. LA DURA LEGG DEL LAVORO Edit
little girls don’t grow up dreaming of becoming prostitutes, so the supply of potential prostitutes is relatively small. Their skills, while not necessarily “specialized,” are practiced in a very specialized context. The job is unpleasant and forbidding in at least two significant ways: the likelihood of violence and the lost opportunity of having a stable family life. As for demand? Let’s just say that an architect is more likely to hire a prostitute than vice versa.Read more at location 1522
Note: X IL CASO DELLE PROST Edit
In the glamour professions—movies, sports, music, fashion—there is a different dynamic at play. Even in second-tier glamour industries like publishing, advertising, and media, swarms of bright young people throw themselves at grunt jobs that pay poorly and demand unstinting devotion. An editorial assistant earning $22,000 at a Manhattan publishing house, an unpaid high-school quarterback, and a teenage crack dealer earning $3.30 an hour are all playing the same game, a game that is best viewed as a tournament. The rules of a tournament are straightforward. You must start at the bottom to have a shot at the top.Read more at location 1525
Note: x I LAVORI GLAMOUR E LE QUATTRO LEGGI Edit
Note: LOGICA DEL TORNEO Edit
You must be willing to work long and hard at substandard wages.Read more at location 1532
once you come to the sad realizationRead more at location 1535
Note: ... Edit
you will quitRead more at location 1535
J. T.’s foot soldiers were unwilling to stayRead more at location 1537
gang warfare was bad for business.Read more at location 1546
But with a gang war, sales plummet because customers are so scared of the violence that they won’t come out in the open to buy their crack. In every way, war was expensive for J. T. So why did he start the war? As a matter of fact, he didn’t. It was his foot soldiers who started it. It turns out that a crack boss didn’t have as much control over his subordinates as he would have liked.Read more at location 1547
Note: COSTI DELLA GUERRA. QUANDO PARTE UNA GUERRA. SPESSO SONO I PEONES CHE LA INNESCANO Edit
For J. T., violence was a distraction from the businessRead more at location 1551
For a foot soldier, however, violence served a purpose.Read more at location 1552
soldier could distinguish himself—Read more at location 1552
proving his mettle for violence.Read more at location 1553
A killer was respected, feared,Read more at location 1553
“We try to tell these shorties that they belong to a serious organization,” he once told Venkatesh. “It ain’t all about killing. They see these movies and shit, they think it’s all about running around tearing shit up. But it’s not. You’ve got to learn to be part of an organization; you can’t be fighting all the time. It’s bad for business.”Read more at location 1554
Note: LA PACE DEI BOSS. IL CAPO SI LAMENTA DEI RISSOSI Edit
J. T. was a winner. He was paid well because so few people could do what he did. He was a tall, good-looking, smart, tough man who knew how to motivate people. He was shrewd too, never tempting arrest by carrying guns or cash. While the rest of his gang lived in poverty with their mothers, J. T. had several homes, several women, several cars. He also had his business education, of course. He constantly worked to extend this advantage. That was why he ordered the corporate-style bookkeeping that eventually found its way into Sudhir Venkatesh’s hands.Read more at location 1558
Note: JT. IL CAPO. UN TIPO DIVERSO Edit
J. T. was promoted to the board of directors.Read more at location 1564
Not long after he made the board of directors, the Black Disciples were essentially shut down by a federal indictment—the same indictment that led the gangster named Booty to turn over his notebooks to Venkatesh—and J. T. was sent to prison.Read more at location 1566
Note: Rischio Edit
Note: x FINALE Edit
what did crack cocaine have in common with nylon stockings?Read more at location 1568
In 1939, when DuPont introduced nylons,Read more at location 1569
silk was delicate, expensive, and in ever shorter supply.Read more at location 1570
By 1941, some sixty-four million pairs of nylon stockings had been soldRead more at location 1571
brought class to the masses.Read more at location 1573
invention of nylon stockings was markedly similar to the invention of crackRead more at location 1573
In the 1970s, if you were the sort of person who did drugs, there was no classier drug than cocaine. Beloved by rock stars and movie stars, ballplayers and even the occasional politician, cocaine was a drug of power and panache. It was clean, it was white, it was pretty. Heroin was droopy and pot was foggy but cocaine provided a beautiful high. Alas, it was also very expensive.Read more at location 1574
Note: x COCA E EROINA Edit
They found that mixing powdered cocaine in a saucepan with baking soda and water, and then cooking off the liquid, produced tiny rocks of smokeable cocaine. It came to be called crack for the crackling sound the baking soda made when it was burned. More affectionate nicknames would soon follow: Rock, Kryptonite, Kibbles ’n Bits, Scrabble, and Love.Read more at location 1581
Note: x INVENZIONE DEL CRACK Edit
class drug was ready for the masses.Read more at location 1584
During the late 1970s, the wholesale price of cocaine in the United States fell dramatically, even as its purity was rising. One man, a Nicaraguan émigré named Oscar Danilo Blandon, was suspected of importing far more Colombian cocaine than anyone else. Blandon did so much business with the budding crack dealers of South Central Los Angeles that he came to be known as the Johnny Appleseed of Crack.Read more at location 1586
Note: x I PREZZI CROLLANO Edit
putting massive amounts of cocaine into the hands of street gangs,Read more at location 1594
a devastating crack boom.Read more at location 1595
gangs have traditionally been a sort of halfway house for recent immigrants.Read more at location 1596
gangs would prove much better at making mayhem than money.Read more at location 1598
these criminals never seemed to get locked up. The 1960s and 1970sRead more at location 1602
The likelihood of punishment was so lowRead more at location 1603
the heyday of a liberal justice system and the criminals’ rights movement—Read more at location 1603
By the 1980s, however, the courts had begun to radically reverse that trend.Read more at location 1604
black gangsters were getting sent to federal prisons.Read more at location 1606
their fellow inmates were Mexican gang members with close ties to Colombian drugRead more at location 1606
the black gangsters had made the connections to buy their cocaine directly from Colombian dealers.Read more at location 1608
Cocaine had never been a big seller in the ghetto: it was too expensive. But that was before the invention of crack.Read more at location 1610
with crack, there was real money to be made.Read more at location 1619
veterans stayed put.Read more at location 1619
the four decades between World War II and the crack boom had been marked by steady and often dramatic improvement. Particularly since the civil rights legislation of the mid-1960s, the telltale signs of societal progress had finally taken root among black Americans. The black-white income gap was shrinking. So was the gap between black children’s test scores and those of white children. Perhaps the most heartening gain had been in infant mortality. As late as 1964, a black infant was twice as likely to die as a white infant, often of a cause as basic as diarrhea or pneumonia.Read more at location 1626
Note: x IL MIGLIORAMENTI DEI NERI. DAL DOPOGUERRA AL CRACK Edit
Then came crack cocaine.Read more at location 1633
After decades of decline, black infant mortality began to soar in the 1980s,Read more at location 1635
rate of low-birthweight babiesRead more at location 1636
parent abandonment.Read more at location 1636
gap between black and white schoolchildren widened.Read more at location 1636
blacks sent to prisonRead more at location 1636
homicide rate among young urban blacks quadrupled.Read more at location 1640
James Alan Fox, perhaps the most widely quoted crime expert in the popular press, warned of a coming “bloodbath” of youth violence.Read more at location 1644
Note: x CASSANDRE Edit
turned out to be wrong.Read more at location 1645
Why did it fall?Read more at location 1648

Inno di Unabomber (guccini cyrano)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WTYTrQ_EWk

Ma siamo proprio sucuri che le lesbiche siano gay?

Tra lesbiche e omosessuali maschi ci sono tali e tante differenze che viene da farsi la domanda.
In particolare se l’è chiesto Steve Sailer in “Why Lesbians Aren't Gay”.
La personalità gay (da ora userò il termine solo per indicare gli omosessuali maschi) è quasi antitetica a quella lesbica. Facciamo qualche esempio…
Nel tempo libero, ad esempio, ai gay piace prendere il sole, alle lesbiche giocare a softball.
Ai gay piace ballare (l’AIDS ha decimato i coreografi), alle lesbiche giocare a biliardo.
I gay adorano i profumi, le lesbiche li odiano (al punto che nei loro bar c’è la zona scent-free).
I gay seguono la moda (Versace, Perry Ellis, Yves Saint Laurent), le lesbiche la snobbano.
I gay sono kitsch e autoironici (le migliori battute omofobe sono le loro), le lesbiche sono sarcastiche (di certo non si conceranno mai con i mascheroni).
Il gay sogna lavori legati all’intrattenimento, le lesbiche allo sport.
Il gay ha bisogno di attenzione e affetto, la lesbica di leadership e guida (sogna il servizio militare).
I gay sono allegri (da cui la parola gay), le lesbiche sempre arrabbiate: il loro motto è “non siamo gay, siamo incazzate”.
I gay sono stati sterminati dall’AIDS, le lesbiche ne sono uscite completamente illese.
I gay amano il sesso libero, le lesbiche sono monogame osservanti.
I gay lo fanno spesso, le lesbiche quasi mai.
I gay sono stregati dalla bellezza (Morte a Venezia, Billy Budd, molti lavori di Britten…), le lesbiche sono piuttosto insensibili al lato estetico delle cose.
I gay sono avidi di pornografia, le lesbiche ne sono disgustate.
I gay fanno sesso anche in locali semi-pubblici, le lesbiche rigorosamente a casa (nella camera da letto).
I gay hanno fantasie di degradazione, le lesbiche rabbrividiscono alla sola idea di “avventura”.
Il gay ama il tipo bello, giovane magro. La lesbica il tipo anonimo (basta vedere le pubblicità su “Personal”).
Il gay ama lavorare con le donne. La lesbica odia lavorare con uomini. Ci sono molti parrucchieri gay ma pochissime barbiere lesbiche.
Il gay ama il lavoro in équipe. La lesbica preferisce maggiore indipendenza.
I gay fanno carriera, sono creativi e ambiziosi. La lesbica è dedita perlopiù alla bassa manovalanza, non ha idee, non punta in alto.
Il gay ama i lavori che implicano relazioni umane. La lesbica è più orientata alla macchina.
I gay amano la vita in città, spesso rivitalizzano interi quartieri con la loro presenza. La lesbica vive – o comunque sogna di vivere - in campagna.
Il gay privilegia la vista, la lesbica la parola. Molti fotografi sono gay, molte giornaliste sono lesbiche. Gay sono molti critici d’arte, lesbiche sono molte critiche letterarie.
I gay gestiscono boutique di antiquariato. La lesbica si orienta sulla libreria.
I gay adorano la musica, in inglese “musical” è sinonimo di gay. Le lesbiche preferiscono le storie.
Il gay di solito dirige un coro e/o fa l’organista. La lesbica canta con la chitarra canzoni folk.
i gay amano l’arte. Le lesbiche non vanno oltre l’artigianato.
il gay vede i corpi come opere d’arte, ama le sculture greche e “Il ritratto di Dorian Grey”. La lesbica è allarmata da qualsiasi cosa che puzzi di reificazione (o mercificazione) dei corpi.
I gay sono snob. Alle lesbiche va tutto bene in fatto di gusti (“Expanding the Canon”).
I gay adorano la classicità e i Greci. Le lesbiche disprezzano la tradizione occidentale.
I gay sono disinteressati alla politica. Le lesbiche sono speso attiviste politiche.
Il gay parla solo per se stesso. La lesbica tende a parlare “in nome delle donne” (la loro Bibbia è “What Women Want”).
Il gay si crede tale per natura. La lesbica per cultura, il suo orientamento sessuale è una scelta politica.
I gay di solito sono perseguitati, le lesbiche ignorate (la convivenza lesbica era legale sia nella Germania Nazista che nell’Inghilterra Vittoriana).
I gay sono tra l’ 1% e il 6% della popolazione. le lesbiche tra lo 0.5% e il 3%.
***
Ce n’è abbastanza per insinuare il sospetto: forse non siamo proprio di fronte allo stesso fenomeno (speculare), il gay medio e la lesbica media sembrano essere molto diversi.
Che lezione trarne sulla natura umana? E come incide la cosa sulle questioni sociali oggi sul tappeto?
Stando ai giornali, meglio non pensarci...
... apparently, we'd be best off not thinking too much about this fact. Better yet, we should avoid even noticing any of these curious details. At least, that's been the implicit message of most of the recent news coverage...
A quanto pare la contrapposizione è "dispersiva". Esiste l' "omosessuale generico", ed è un martire. Punto e basta...
... so many of today's auto-pilot articles and paint-by-the-numbers newscasts depict homosexuals as merely one dimensional martyrs to prejudice...
I media prediligono un ritratto unidemensionale dell'omosessualità, in modo da ricondurre tutto all' unica vera contrapposizione che per loro conta, quella tra omosessuali e omofobi...
... natural urge of journalists to reduce complex and unsettling questions about human nature to just another fable starring good guys/ gals we all can identify with (in this case, "gays"), who are discriminated against by bad guys (" homophobes")...
Ebbene, visto che andiamo sempre a caccia di stereotipi, questo  è il più gigantesco che esista, e viene propalato a reti e redazioni unificate.
Ma il giornalista telecomandato sembra più ansioso di dispensare prediche moralistiche che di comprendere la realtà, per questo evita accuratamente le insidiose linee di faglia che separano gli omosessuali...
... As with any other large collection of people, numerous fault lines divide homosexuals, but the most remarkable is the one separating gay men from lesbians...
Nel frattempo una cosa è certa: le lesbiche sono talmente poco gay che respingono al mittente la parola stessa (e per loro le parole sono “vacche sacre”, ricordiamolo)...
... The media's habit of applying the word to female homosexuals is male chauvinism at its most blatant: "gay" is just about the last term lesbians would have invented to describe themselves. As one lesbian activist succinctly put it, "We're not gay, we're angry!")...
Il giornalista telecomandato guarda la lista che ho fatto e in lui scatta il riflesso condizionato: "trattasi di stereotipi!".
In questi casi si presenta sempre un problema: quanto più un'affermazione è vera, tanto più presta il fianco  all'accusa di essere uno stereotipo. Le cose vere molto spesso hanno anche l'aria di essere vere.
Ma oltre a ciò c'è la voglia di equivocare per dismettere ogni pericolosa discussione. Esempio...
... Thus, even carefully worded summations of the obvious like, "Men tend to be more aggressive than women," are triumphantly refuted with, "So, you think Mister Rogers is more aggressive than Mrs. Thatcher? Huh? Huh?"...
Insomma, qual è lo strumento più prezioso per intavolare discussioni produttive su questi temi? Il concetto di "distribuzione probabilistica”, ovvio. Altrimenti noto come "Curva di Bell".
Quella cosa che rende compatibili affermazioni tipo "gli uomini tendono ad essere più aggressivi delle donne"  col fatto che "molte donne siano molto più aggressive di molti uomini".
Ma il giornalista non riesce, non vuole capire la Curva di Bell, che detto altrimenti significa che non vuole ragionare del problema...
... Rather than help educate the public to think in terms of bell-shaped curves and individual variances, the press instead warns us to abstain altogether from noticing average differences between groups....
Per questo è impossibile discutere con lui: la Curva di Bell mette in pericolo la sua predica ben tornita.
Ma questo tabù diffonde solo ignoranza. Senza la Curva di Bell la vita diventa proprio quella roba informe che ha in mente Homer Simpson: "un mucchio di cose indistinte che succedono".
Naturalmente, non appena torna a casa sua, anche il giornalista telecomandato smette di praticare la "virtuosa ignoranza" che predica senza sosta sul lavoro, non si puo’ vivere a lungo in quella bolla.
Facciamo un esempio. Qualche tempo fa era di moda credere che...
... "10% of all men and women are homosexual."...
Lo affermò per primo il critico gay Bruce Bawer, un tale che...
... has written of how he can know from momentary eye contact that a young father pushing a baby carriage past him on the street is "living a lie."...
La sua era una strana affermazione che comunque, essendo di natura  empirica, era per nostra fortuna verificabile, almeno in parte. E sarebbe stato doveroso farlo, soprattutto vista la fonte. Ma non aspettatevi che il giornalista automatico lo abbia fatto, lui è disposto a bersi di tutto se funzionale al suo predicozzo pan-moralista...
... Are homosexuals fairly common, like, say, tax-cheaters, lefthanders, or tithe-givers? Or are they fairly rare, like prison inmates, identical twins, or clergy? This is certainly an interesting topic, but why this purely empirical question is thought to possess such moral consequence that many people feel compelled to lie about it is beyond me....
Veniamo ora ad altri guai propalati dalla “santa ignoranza” indotta a redazioni unificate.
Per esempio, ci sono genitori che prendono male il "coming out" dei rispettivi figli: in loro dispetto e sorpresa si mescolano.
Come reagisce a tutto cio’ il giornalista automatico? Invoca un mondo in cui una rivelazione del genere possa essere accolta come una buon notizia. Bene.
Ora, il “dispetto” risulta un po’ difficile da combattere (quella robetta che chiamiamo “scienza” ci dice che in genere ci piacerebbe tanto trasmettere i nostri geni), ma la “sorpresa”, quella la si puo’ evitare se si osserva bene cosa fa e come si comporta il proprio figlio… 
... Disappointment, however, is inevitable: the desire to pass on your genes to grandchildren is bedrock human nature. What is far more avoidable, though, is the surprise. A more worldly awareness of those enduring likes and dislikes that tend to correlate with sexual orientation, and which so often manifest themselves early in childhood, could quite frequently allow the parents of children who turn out to be homosexual to have already spent years slowly getting used to the likelihood that this child won't ever make them grandparents, but can still make them proud and happy in many other ways...
Dal comportamento di un ragazzo, dai suoi atteggiamenti effemminati, possiamo prevedere la sua omosessualità, ma della cosa non si deve parlare, sul punto vige il dogma della “santa ignoranza”, bisogna tacere per non evocare stereotipi (nemmeno quelli veri), per il giornalista automatico un argomento del genere è tabù.
Certo, la previsione non è facile, non è lineare, si colloca su una Curva di Bell e lui non vuol sentirne parlare… stereotipi, stereotipi…
Il caso della musica...
... for many other traits, homosexuals exhibit their own sex's tendencies to a heightened degree. For instance, all great classical composers have been male. At least since Tchaikovsky, though, an impressive number of leading composers have been gay or bisexual (e.g., Britten, Copland, Barber, Poulenc, Corigliano, and Bernstein). In comparison, although "Women's Music" festivals play an important role in lesbian culture, their audiences distrust dazzling exhibitions of musical virtuosity, instead preferring simple folk songs with sincere lyrics...
Difficile allora farsi un'idea della realtà respingendo i fatti in quanto pericolosi ed evocatori di stereotipi...
... Has anyone yet deciphered a Unified Field Theory that would explain all of these complex patterns? Not that I'm aware of, but we can't begin to look for one without laying out all the facts first...
Non resta che l'idilliaca ignoranza per costruire nella propria testa un mondo ideale che prima o poi diventerà realtà.
Certo, la contrapposizione gay/lesbiche non è l'unica alternativa a quella omosessuale/omofobo. I popoli latini ne propongono altre...
... Americans insist on labeling as "gay" both Truman Capote and that exemplar of murderous masculine charisma, Alexander the Great... Latins are inclined to care less than Americans about whom a man goes to bed with and more about what he does there. Although this dominant vs. submissive distinction has evaporated from America's polite discourse, it remains the main theme of our impolite discourse...
Ma veniamo ora alle questioni sociali, forse le più interessanti. E’ qui, infatti, che la contrapposizione gay/lesbiche viene esorcizzata con più forza, eppure dovrebbe essere centrale...
... Homosexual-related issues like gays in the military, AIDS, and same-sex marriages cannot be discussed realistically without acknowledging the wide differences on average between gays and lesbians....
Pochi anni fa il giornalista automatica strombazzava entusiasta la "radice biologica" dell'omosessualità. Ma...
... most of the research was performed on gay male subjects by gay male scientists and then hyped by gay male publicists. Going largely unreported is the lesbian population's profound ambivalence...
Si tratta di risultati che in qualche modo possono “tenere” per i gay... e le lesbiche?
Non solo i dati a supporto per le lesbiche sono esigui, le lesbiche stesse rigettano la "radice biologica" (forse che anche per questo le ricerche su questo punto si sono stoppate immediatamente?). Sentite le parole di fuoco della Federman...
... For example, an attack on the theory that lesbianism has biological causes is one of the main themes of Lillian Faderman's fine history of American lesbians, Odd Girls and Twilight Lovers...
La teoria della "radice biologica", molto semplicemente, per quanto ben accetta dai gay, contraddice la teoria gender tanto cara al femminismo contemporaneo. Ed ecco che in un amen i gay, i ricercatori gay e i pubblicisti gay sono diventati i nemici pubblici numero uno del femminismo. Eppure, di queste battaglie TRA omosessuali non si può parlare, c’è solo la battaglia tra omofobi e omosessuali.
Mentre i gay sono "biofili" le e femministe sono fieramente "biofobiche".
Chi avrà ragione? Può anche darsi che esistano due omosessualità differenziate, o che le lesbiche non siano affatto omosessuali. L’argomento è molto interessante, purtroppo è difficile che lo sapremo mai vista la santa ignoranza a cui ci condanna il giornalista automatico su questi temi...
... On the other hand, the lesbian-feminists might be right and the gay researcher/ activists wrong about the nature of homosexuality. Or, homosexuality might not have a single nature: at minimum, there could be a fundamental difference between lesbians and gays...
Secondo le femministe la "socializzazione" è all'origine di tutto.
Bene, ma chi mette in crisi questa  fede nel potere dell’ “ambiente”, questo credo costruzionista? I maschilisti? No, i gay: sono loro i veri nemici (ma non si può dire)...
... When discussing all other social controversies, the serious media instead pay mindful lip service to the dogma that socialization is the root of all differences between people.... a public donnybrook between gay men and lesbian-feminists over nature vs. nurture...
Ma il conflitto nature/nurture (che adombra quello gay/lesbiche) è alla base di molti problemi sociali...
... Fundamentally, as Thomas Sowell has pointed out, almost all American social controversies rest on conflicting assumptions about human nature. Is it infinitely malleable? If not, what are its constraints?...
Perché aiutare chi non uscirà mai dalla sua condizione? L'innatismo distrugge le premesse del welfare state. Mica paglia.
Prendere sul serio l'omosessualità e i gay può scuotere il sonno dogmatico del femminismo gender...
... For instance, honest discussion of the differences between lesbians and gays would also generate fresh insights into what feminists imperialistically call "women's" issues. While feminist theory is largely immune from radical questioning in most of the prestige media, few people actually take it seriously . . . especially feminists. They seldom pay their own theory the respect of treating it like a scientific theory and testing it against the evidence... feminists should welcome a frank appraisal of the contrasting longings and ambitions of gays and lesbians, since this offers fascinating new perspectives from which to assay feminist hypotheses...
Altro esempio: le femministe accusano di continuo il mondo della moda e il mito della bellezza...
... feminists tirelessly denounce the fashion and beauty industry for brainwashing American men into craving skin-deep feminine beauty...
Il mito della bellezza, di fatto, assoggetta la donna e la costringe a comportamenti da schiava. Naomi Wolf c’ha scritto addirittura un intero libro: La Mistica della Femminilità.
Per loro il maschio è un alienato che vede il “corpo della donna” in TV diventando succube di pulsioni indotte. Ma il gay è la confutazione vivente di questo cervellotico teorema...
... Luckily, the curious analyst can study people who have rejected heterosexual socialization...
Il gay ha respinto la canonica socializzazione del maschio eterosessuale, eppure non sembra meno sensibile alla bellezza dei corpi femminili. Anzi, ne è stregato!
Provate a confrontare la rubrica "Woman seeking Woman" delle riviste lesbiche con la rubrica "Man seeking Man" delle riviste gay. L'enfasi sulla bellezza è una prerogativa degli uomini: dei gay molto più che dei machi.
A quanto pare, dunque, il complotto maschilista è capeggiato e ordito dai gay, che tra l'altro, nel mondo della moda rivestono un ruolo di primo piano.
L'immagine stereotipata della femmina appartiene innanzitutto all'immaginario gay...
... In this battle for the hearts and minds of the female masses, it is the gay imagination that so often crystalizes the misty yearnings of femininity into those beguiling baubles and alluring images that help seduce heterosexual women away from the stern precepts of feminism...
Sono i gay i principale sabotatori della "lotta alla femminilità". È un paradosso che ci fa ulteriormente capire perché sull'opposizione gay/lesbiche regni un imbarazzato silenzio.
***
Come concludere? Forse così: tutti noi siamo ignoranti, specie su questi temi, non ci resta che imparare, e gli stereotipi servono anche a quello, il fatto che siano imperfetti non autorizza a sostituirli con un silenzio ipocrita. Gli stereotipi sono uno strumento conoscitivo, vanno migliorati, mai eliminati...
...  We can never eliminate stereotypes. Instead, we should constantly search for more and better stereotypes...
MATISSE

martedì 14 febbraio 2017