sabato 27 febbraio 2016

Bad Religion: How We Became a Nation of Heretics di Ross Douthat - PROLOGUE A NATION OF HERETICS

Bad Religion: How We Became a Nation of Heretics di Ross Douthat - PROLOGUE A NATION OF HERETICS - #ortodossiaemoderazione #eresiasenzacentro #religionecolla #dissensonecessario #paradosso&mistero (et-et)

PROLOGUE A NATION OF HERETICSRead more at location 96
After the great crash of 2008, Americans awoke and saw their country the way anti-Americans have always seen it:Read more at location 97
Note: IL DECLINO AMERICANO Edit
the land of self-reliance was buried in debt.Read more at location 99
Note: L AMERICA DOPO LA CRISI. Edit
During the 2008 election season, the extraordinary unpopularity of George W. Bush made him an obvious scapegoatRead more at location 102
Note: IL CAPRO Edit
there were trends at work that couldn’t be reversed by simply dispatching a more talented set of leaders to Washington, D.C.Read more at location 106
Note: IL TREND Edit
Conservatives denounce liberals as free-spending socialists, while liberals denounce conservatives for championing a cult of deregulated dog-eat-dog.Read more at location 108
Note: TEORIE DEL DECLINO Edit
the challenges of a polarized country and a globalized world.Read more at location 110
Note: LA SFIDA Edit
some theories are frankly conspiratorial, involving perfidious foreigners and conniving corporations,Read more at location 110
Note: COMPLOTTISMO Edit
The most potent theories, though, involve religion. This is as it should be because, at the deepest level, every human culture is religious—definedRead more at location 112
Note: LA RELIGIONE Edit
The reality doesn’t have to be a personal God: It can be the iron laws of Marxism, the religion of blood and soil, the Gaia hypothesis, the church of the free market, the cult of the imperial self.Read more at location 114
Note: ...LATAMENTE INTESA Edit
The first holds that Americans have lost their way because they’ve fallen away from the faithRead more at location 117
Note: DESTRA CRISTIANA Edit
United States was founded as an explicitly “Christian nation”Read more at location 119
The more sophisticated version follows Alexis de Tocqueville in suggesting that American democracy, while formally secular, has always depended on religionRead more at location 120
Their scapegoats include progressive educators, activist judges, Hollywood elites, and the deophobic media.Read more at location 124
Note: I NEMICI Edit
a growing chorus began insisting that the United States is in decline because it’s excessively religious.Read more at location 128
Note: LA SINISTRA ATEA Edit
the political controversies of the 2000s as an apocalyptic struggle between science and ignorance, reason and superstition,Read more at location 130
Note: GUERRE CULTURALI Edit
the spate of Bush-era books attacking “Christian fascists,” “Christian nationalists,” and “Christianists,” culminating in Kevin Phillips’s bestselling jeremiad American Theocracy.)Read more at location 132
Note: LA GEREMIADE Edit
atheists who shared Christopher Hitchens’s sweeping assessment that religion “poisons everything.”Read more at location 134
These two visions seem mutually contradictory—but both contain an element of truth. America has indeed become less traditionally ChristianRead more at location 136
Note: LA SINTESI Edit
But certain kinds of religious faith are as influential as ever, just as secular critics and the new atheists contend—andRead more at location 138
Note: ... Edit
America’s problem isn’t too much religion, or too little of it. It’s bad religion: the slow-motion collapse of traditional Christianity and the rise of a variety of destructive pseudo-Christianities in its place.Read more at location 140
Note: TESI Edit
Since the 1960s, the institutions that sustained orthodox Christian belief—Catholic and Protestant alike—have entered a state of near-terminal decline.Read more at location 142
Note: ORTODOSSIA IN CRISI Edit
a growing number are inventing their own versions of what Christianity means, abandoning the nuances of traditional theology in favor of religions that stroke their egosRead more at location 146
Note: IL FAI DA TE Edit
The secular mistake has been to assume that every theology tends inevitably toward the same follies and fanaticisms,Read more at location 151
Note: L ERRORE DEGLI ATEI Edit
The religious mistake has been to fret over the threat posed by explicitly anti-Christian forces, while ignoring or minimizing the influence that the apostles of pseudo-Christianity exercise over the American soul.Read more at location 152
Note: L ERRORE DEI CISTIANI Edit
the children of light contend with the children of darkness, and every inch of ground is claimed by absolute truth or deplorable error.Read more at location 154
Note: LA SEMPLIFICAZIONE Edit
where papal encyclicals rarely penetrate and the works of Richard Dawkins pass unread. That’s where you’ll find the reality of contemporary religion,Read more at location 156
Note: LA PANCIA AMERICANA Edit
You’re either a rigid fundamentalist who believes that dinosaurs just missed hitching a ride on Noah’s Ark, or a self-consciously progressive believer for whom the Bible is a kind of refrigerator magnet poetry,Read more at location 161
Note: IL GREAT DIVIDE Edit
religion actively encourages the sort of recklessness that produced our current economic meltdown, rather than serving as a brake on materialism and a rebuke to avarice.Read more at location 169
Note: TEOLOGI LIBERISTI Edit
The result is a society where pride becomes “healthy self-esteem,” vanity becomes “self-improvement,” adultery becomes “following your heart,” greed and gluttony become “living the American dream.”Read more at location 173
Note: L ESITO Edit
the spread of democracy is part of the divine plan, the doctrine of American exceptionalism is a kind of Eleventh Commandment,Read more at location 176
Note: IL MESSIA AMERICANO E L INTERVENTO UMANITARIO Edit
The results: an overreaching foreign policy underRead more at location 177
not a Christian country, but a nation of heretics.Read more at location 181
Note: L AMERICA OGGI: Edit
But haven’t we always been a nation of heretics?Read more at location 182
Note: IL DUBBIO Edit
You can’t have fringes without a center, iconoclasts without icons, revolutionaries without institutions to rebel against. We have always been a nation of heretics, but heresy has never had the field to itself.Read more at location 189
Note: IL PUNTO DI DIVERSITÀ Edit
now consider orthodox Christianity’s contribution to America as well. From the beginning, the existence of a Christian center—first exclusively Protestant, and then eventually accommodating Catholicism as well—has helped bind together a teeming, diverse, and fissiparous nation.Read more at location 207
Note: LA COLLA Edit
It has also often provided a means of necessary dissent—dissent from the intellectual overconfidence of the Age of Reason and the anti-intellectualism of nineteenth-century revivalism, dissent from the cold scientism of the Gospel According to Darwin and the crass materialism of the Gospel According to the Robber Barons, dissent from the desiccated rationalism of modernist theology and the dreary literalism of fundamentalism.Read more at location 218
Note: LA CHIESA E IL DISSENSO NECESSARIO Edit
Americans, steeped in the ideal of religious freedom, take it for granted that orthodoxy without room for heresy is dangerous. Think of the Inquisition, they say, or the trial of Galileo, or (a little closer to home) the Puritan witch hunts. Yet heresy without room for orthodoxy turns out to be dangerous as well.Read more at location 222
Note: I DUE PERICOLI, DI CUI UNO INVISIBILE Edit
Many of the overlapping crises in American life, from our foreign policy disasters to the housing bubble to the rate of out-of-wedlock births, can be traced to the impulse to emphasize one particular element of traditional Christianity—one insight, one doctrine, one teaching or tradition—at the expense of all the others.Read more at location 224
Note: L ERESIA CHESTERTONIANA E LA CRISI DI OGGI Edit
Heresy sets out to be simpler and more appealing and more rational, but it often ends up being more extreme.Read more at location 228
Note: IL LATO OSCURO DELL ERESIA Edit
The definition of heresy proposed by Alister McGrath is a useful one: A Christian heresy is “best seen as a form of Christian belief that, more by accident than design, ultimately ends up subverting, destabilizing or even destroying the core of Christian faith.”Read more at location 239
Note: DEFINIZIONEDI RRESIA COME SBILANCIAMENTO Edit
we should be able to recognizeRead more at location 245
Note: EQUILIBRIO: Edit
the crucial role that heresyRead more at location 246
without going to the extreme of denying that Christianity has a theological coreRead more at location 246
Thomas Oden calls “the consensus of the early church.”Read more at location 249
Note: IL CUORE DELLA CRISTIANITÀ Edit
This consensus includes the basic dogmas of the faith: Christ’s incarnation and atonement, the Trinity and the Virgin Birth, the forgiveness of sins and the possibility of everlasting life. It includes a belief in the divine inspiration and authority of a particular set of sacred scriptures, the Old and New Testaments, with no additional revelations added on and nothing papered over or rejected. It includes an adherence to the moral vision encoded in the Ten Commandments and expanded and deepened in the New Testament: a rejection of violence and cruelty, a deep suspicion of worldly wealth and power, and a heavy stress on chastity. It includes a commitment to the creeds of the ancient world—Nicene, Apostolic, Athanasian—and to the idea that a church, however organized and governed, should guarantee and promulgate them. And it includes the idea of orthodoxy—the belief that there exists “a faith once delivered to the saints,” and that the core of Christianity is an inheritance from the first apostles, rather than being something that every believer can and should develop for himself.Read more at location 252
Note: IL CUORE DELLA CHIESA CrISTIANA Edit
commitment to mystery and paradox.Read more at location 260
Note: IL CUORE DEL CUORE Edit
divine and human all at once,Read more at location 263
Note: I PARADOSSI DEL CRISTIANO Edit
Three as well as One,Read more at location 264
God is omnipotent and omniscient and yet nonetheless leaves us freeRead more at location 264
the world is corrupted by original sin and yet somehow also essentially good,Read more at location 265
the God of the Old Testament, jealous and punitive, is somehow identical to the New Testament’s God of love and mercy.Read more at location 266
this same God sets impossible moral standards and yet forgives every sin.Read more at location 267
They could have joined the movement that we call Gnosticism in attempting to minimizeRead more at location 271
Note: LA CHIESA HA SEMPRE SCELTO LA VIA DEL MISTERO SACRIFICANDO LA RAGIONE Edit
They could have fallen in line behind the second-century theologian Marcion’s perfectly reasonable attempt to resolve the tensions between the Gospels and the Hebrew scriptures by abandoning Christianity’s Jewish roots entirely.Read more at location 274
They could have listened to the earnest British moralist Pelagius instead of to Saint Augustine, and replaced the mysteries of grace and original sin with the more commonsensical vision of a GodRead more at location 275
In each instance, and in many more as well, they chose the way of mystery instead—orRead more at location 277
Church forged a faith whose doctrines speak to the intuition, nearly universal among human beings, that the true nature of the world will always remain just beyond our grasp.Read more at location 280
Indeed, this is perhaps the greatest Christian paradox of all—that the world’s most paradoxical religion has cultivated rationalism and scientific rigor more diligently than any of its rivals, making the Christian world safe for philosophy as well as fervor, for the study of nature as well as the contemplation of divinity.Read more at location 281
Note: IL PIÙ GRANDE PARADOSSO Edit
the paradoxes of Christian doctrine have always been a source of scandal as well as strength—notRead more at location 286
Note: LE CRITICHE FACILI Edit
Christian heresies vary wildly in their theological substance, but almost all have in common a desire to resolve Christianity’s contradictions,Read more at location 289
Note: CIÒ CHE UNISCE LE ERESIE Edit
Gnostics sought to make Christianity more appealing by making it more overtly supernatural.Read more at location 295
Note: GLI GNOSTICI Edit
Deists and Unitarians went in the opposite direction, trying to rescue Christianity from the scorn of the scientific age by stripping away its supernatural aspectsRead more at location 297
Note: DEISTI Edit
In G. K. Chesterton’s vivid vision of Christian history, the fullness of truth is sustained in a perpetual balancing act,Read more at location 301
Note: L ARTE DELL EQUILIBRIO Edit
the pull-and-push of competing heresies may be precisely the thing that keeps the edifice of Christian faith upright.Read more at location 319
Note: L UTILITÀ DELL ERESIA Edit
United States has offered to Christianity: a chance, in a nation with no establishment of religion,Read more at location 323
Note: GLI USA E LA CRISTIANITÀ Edit
In America, because orthodoxy couldn’t be taken for granted, orthodoxy came alive.Read more at location 331
orthodoxy slowly withers and only heresies endure.Read more at location 334
Note: MA NEL XXI SECOLO... Edit
a widespread sense that traditional Christian faith and contemporary liberal democracy were natural partners.Read more at location 336
Note: IL RACCONTO DEL CAP.1 Edit
an era of theological convergence gave way to a Christian civil war. They cover the divisions produced by controversies ranging from the Vietnam War to the debate over abortion;Read more at location 341
Note: I TRE CAPITOLI SEGUENTI Edit
In the second half of the book I consider American Christianity as it is today, in the wake of this slow-motion collapse, focusing on heresy’s increasing dominanceRead more at location 347
Note: LA II PARTE DEL LIBRO Edit
specific individuals—Joel Osteen and Dan Brown, Oprah Winfrey and Elizabeth Gilbert, Eckhart Tolle and Glenn Beck.Read more at location 349
Both doubters and believers have benefited from the role that institutional Christianity has traditionally played in our national life—its communal role, as a driver of assimilation and a guarantor of social peace,Read more at location 361
Note: IL RUOLO CIVILE DELLA RELIGIONE IN AMERICA Edit
Both doubters and believers stand to lose if religion in the age of heresy turns out to be complicit in our fragmented communities, our collapsing families,Read more at location 364
Both doubters and believers will inevitably suffer from a religious culture that supplies more moral license than moral correction, more self-satisfaction than self-examination, more comfort than chastisement

venerdì 26 febbraio 2016

Cancel currency? By John H. Cochrane

Cancel currency? By John H. Cochrane
  • Perchè abolire il contante. Ken has two basic points: The zero bound, and tax evasion / illegal economy.
  • Zero bound
  • Many economists would like the Federal Reserve to be able to set a negative interest rate... As long as you--and more importantly, banks -- can hold cash, which pays a zero interest rate, the Fed can't impose a negative interest
  • This has led to a number of creative proposals....Willem Buiter.. has discussed ... devices for paying negative interest rates on currency... stamp taxes......Mankiw (2009) points out that the central bank could effectively tax currency by holding lotteries based on serial numbers... the ultimate version of this idea: get rid of cash
  • Suppose we have substantially negative interest rates -- -5% or -10%, say, and lasting a while. But there is no currency. How else can you ensure yourself a zero riskless nominal return?
  • Prepay taxes.
  • Gift cards.
  • stored value cards,
  • Prepay bills.
  • Prepay rent
  • Businesses: prepay suppliers and leases.
  • Now in each case, you might say this can be changed. The IRS could refuse pre-payments
  • So, bottom line, we cannot have strongly negative nominal rates without a legal revolution essentially negative-indexing the entire economy
  • "Illegal" transactions, regulations, and tax evasion
  • Paper currency facilitates making transactions anonymous,
  • Though anonymity facilitates evasion of "good" taxes and necessary regulations, the ability to transact anonymously is an important safety valve that protects our economy and many others around the world from a welter of "bad" taxes, laws, and overly intrusive regulations. How much of each we have now, and how desirable strict enforcement is depends on where you sit. I imagine opinions differ at Harvard vs. Cato or Mercatus.
  • Big companies and wealthy people who pay most of the taxes in the US don't have to cheat; they just hire good lawyers and lobbyists.
  • In the U.S., eliminating cash would heavily impact the poor. The U.S. has 11 million undocumented immigrants, most working and transacting in cash....What little entrepreneurship and activity exists in many poor parts of inner cities survives on cash,
  • A lot of "tax evasion" using currency consists of quite poor people evading the astronomical marginal tax rates implicit in social programs. People on social security disability, and medicaid, say, who would lose lots of benefits if they reported income... Do we really want them to obey all the rules strictly -- not work at all?
  • The world in which the Federal Government must pre-approve every employment strikes me as a nightmare .
  • Estimates for Europe put the "shadow economy" at least 20% of GDP, and a larger fraction of employment especially for young people....It's not obvious that eliminating cash and cash transactions in Europe would raise tax revenue, rather than simply lowering actual GDP and employment by 20% or more.
  • we already have lost a great deal of the ability to transact anonymously, and the current technological and policy trend is entirely in the other direction.
  • Liberty
  • More deeply, a world in which the Federal Government can observe every single transaction made by every single person and corporation, and thereby reconstruct the size and composition of every person's wealth, strikes me as an Orwellian nightmare.
  • Imagine what J. Edgar Hoover could have done to the civil rights and anti-war movements with the ability to see every transaction in the country.
  • Substitutes and a chilling ending:
  • Last but not least, if any country attempts to unilaterally reduce the use of its currency, there is a risk that another country’s currency would be used within domestic borders.
  • Bitcoin, though very imperfect in a lot of dimensions, shows the strong demand for anonymous transactions and wealth holding.
continua

The College Premium vs. the Marriage Premium: A Case of Double Standards By Bryan Caplan

#caplan matrimonio
The College Premium vs. the Marriage Premium: A Case of Double Standards By Bryan Caplan
  • For males, the college premium and the marriage premium are roughly equal. In the NLSY, for example, you earn 34% more if you're a college grad, and 44% more if you're a married male*:
  • When people - economists and non-economists alike - look at the size of that college premium, they usually conclude that more people should go to college.
  • personal level, that 44% premium doesn't lead them to urge men to marry. On a policy level, the 44%
  • 1. You could point out that (a) married women earn 10% less,...But the male marriage bonus vastly exceeds... Indeed, the net premium for a couple almost exactly equals the college premium.
  • 2. You could object that the marriage premium is largely selection.... But like the college premium...
  • 3. You could object that men fail to marry despite the high premium because they would hate being married. But you can say the same about school:
  • 4. You could object that encouraging marriage restricts people's freedom, but encouraging college doesn't . But this makes no sense.
  • 5. You could say that education has positive externalities, but marriage doesn't.... externalities of marriage are far less debatable than the externalities of education.
continua

Il bene arriva per mezzo di un altro – Amicizia e relazioni nell’epoca del web - incontro con Luigi Ballerini

Il bene arriva per mezzo di un altro – Amicizia e relazioni nell’epoca del web - incontro con Luigi Ballerini
  • appunti conferenza
  • INTRO
  • Il bene si riceve da un altro grazie ad un apertura.
  • BALLERINI
  • Ciorven e l isola dei gabbiani. Una bbina della lindgren
  • Il bambino adulto della l. C. è amica di un adulto. Alla pari.
  • Noi nn abbiamo qs rapporto alla pari. Alla mamma!
  • Componenti: Sensibilità motricità e pensiero. Il titto in un corpo.
  • L esperienza si fa col corpo.
  • Il pc esalta la vista.
  • La tecnologia riduce l'esperienza.
  • Il gruppo mamme s impiccia di tutto. Nn c è più privacy.
  • Promesse del web: puoi sempre essere altrove.
  • Seconda promessa: avrai degli ascoltatori automatici.
  • Terza promessa: nn sarai mai solo.
  • Generazione x: la più controllata e la più abbandonata.
  • La sfida nel virtuale si vince nel reale. Se ho un reale interessante userò bene il virtuale.
  • Allarme: il ritiro dal reale e l incupirsi.
  • Non punire togliendo il reale.
  • **(*****(**(***********I CONCETTI CHIAVE*********
  • - + Autorità. Cultura: matrimonio e amante
  • Bolla
  • - Conflitto. Pregiudizi puntellati. Polarizzazione. Populismo
  • - + Stringa. Homo ordo assemblaggio. Autismo
  • - Narcisismo
  • + Spiritualità interiorità. Intimità. Sfumature
  • - sensibilità. Avere un amico vero compensa.
  • - Stupidità. Bias. Scripta manent. Memoria poincarè. Pregiudizi puntellati. Polarizzazione
  • + Dilettantismo
  • + Collaborazione open source
  • + - Fake identità abito monaco. Autenticità alla nozick.
  • + Catarsi.
  • + - Fantasia. Memoria poincarè. Sinfonia. E ricerca scolastica.
  • Giornali
  • Mix strategy
  • - + Costo opportunità: ansia. Costo della scelta.
  • + Teorema di alchian
  • + - Attenzione merce rara.
  • - + Scuola online e teatro. Motivazione.
continua