mercoledì 14 dicembre 2016

Pensiero e linguaggio Geoffrey K. Pullum Julie Sedivy Mark Liberman Elizabeth spelke broncobilly jhon ray

Notebook per
Pensiero e linguaggio
Geoffrey K. Pullum Julie Sedivy Mark Liberman Elizabeth spelke broncobilly jhon ray
Citation (APA): ray, G. K. P. J. S. M. L. E. s. b. j. (2014). Pensiero e linguaggio [Kindle Android version]. Retrieved from Amazon.com

Parte introduttiva
Nota - Posizione 1
nasce prima il pensiero o il linguaggio? concetti senza termini. bimbi coreani e inglesi il cuore condiviso dei significati destra/sinistra: psicologia lakofiana educazione ricevuta e orientamemto politico
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 27
Which comes first, language or thought? Elizabeth Spelker Babies think first By William J. Cromie
Nota - Posizione 28
T
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 29
Do we learn to think before we speak, or does language shape our thoughts?
Nota - Posizione 29
LA DOMANDA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 30
"Infants are born with a language-independent system for thinking about objects,"
Nota - Posizione 31
L-INDIPENDENT
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 32
For example, when Koreans say that one object joins another, they specify whether the objects touch tightly or loosely. English speakers, in contrast, say whether one object is in or on another.
Nota - Posizione 34
CORESNI E INGLESI
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 37
Because languages differ this way, many scientists suspected that children must learn the relevant concepts as they learn their language.
Nota - Posizione 37
SOSPETTO
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 38
Infants of English-speaking parents easily grasp the Korean distinction between a cylinder fitting loosely or tightly into a container. In other words, children come into the world with the ability to describe what's on their young minds in English, Korean, or any other language.
Nota - Posizione 40
CONCETTI CHE PREVEDONO
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 40
differences in niceties of thought not reflected in a language go unspoken when they get older.
Nota - Posizione 40
IL NON DETTO È CMQ SPECIALIZZATA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 42
When babies see something new, they will look at it until they get bored. Hespos and Spelke used this well-known fact to show different groups of five-month-olds a series of cylinders being placed in and on tight- or loose-fitting containers. The babies watched until they were bored and quit looking. After that happened, the researchers showed them other objects that fit tightly or loosely together. The change got and held their attention for a while, contrary to American college students who failed to notice it. This showed that babies raised in English-speaking communities were sensitive to separate categories of meaning used by Korean, but not by English, adult speakers.
Nota - Posizione 47
CAPACITÀ DI ATTENSIONE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 50
Their findings suggest that language reduces sensitivity to thought distinctions not considered by the native language. "Because chimps and monkeys show similar expectations about objects, languages are probably built on concepts that evolved before humans did,"
Nota - Posizione 51
SENSIBILITÀ RIDOTTA MA NN ANNULLATA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 53
The sounds of meaning
Nota - Posizione 54
T
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 54
before babies learn to talk for themselves, they are receptive to the sounds of all languages. But sensitivity to nonnative language sounds drops after the first year of life.
Nota - Posizione 55
PREDISPOSIZIONE A TUTTI I LINGUAGGI
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 58
They learn what to ignore,
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 60
This is one reason why it is so difficult for adults to learn a second language,
Nota - Posizione 61
IMPARIAMO AD ESCLUDERE. X QS NN IMPARIAMO LE LINGUE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 62
Speech is for communicating so once a language is learned nothing is lost by ignoring sounds irrelevant to it. However, contrasts such as loose-versus-tight fit help us make sense of the world. Although mature English speakers don't spontaneously notice these categories, they have little difficulty distinguishing them when they are pointed out.
Nota - Posizione 63
IMPARARE CONCETTI ESTRANEI NJ È COME IMPARARE UNA LINGUA ESTRANEA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 66
Even if babies come equipped with all concepts that languages require, children may learn optional word meanings differently.
Nota - Posizione 66
RAFFINAMENTO
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 68
Bloom points out, "is that there exists a universal core of meaningful distinctions that all humans share, but other distinctions that people make are shaped by the forces of language. On the other hand, language learning might really be the act of learning to express ideas that already exist,"
Nota - Posizione 70
ESPRIMERE IDEE CHE GIÀ ESISTONO
Nota - Posizione 72
T
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 74
Lakoff has written a book (reviewed here) which purports to explain the Left/Right polarity of politics as Mother-oriented politics versus Father-oriented politics
Nota - Posizione 75
DESTRA SINISTRA MADRE PADRE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 76
He rightly points out that there are many "contradictions" (I would call them compromises) in any real-life political program
Nota - Posizione 77
CONTRSDDIZIONI
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 77
he has a grand theory that explains how all such apparent contradictions arise -- a theory that shows the real consistency underlying
Nota - Posizione 78
COERENTIZZARE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 79
I too think I can explain the inconsistencies Lakoff mentions but I think I can explain it, not in a book, but in one paragraph.
Nota - Posizione 80
ALTERNATIVA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 80
What I would say that is that the contradictions arise because neither side of politics is in fact much INTERESTED in being consistent.
Nota - Posizione 81
TESI
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 81
Conservatives don't like theories and just go by what seems to have worked well for people in the world to date
Nota - Posizione 82
DESTRA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 82
And Leftists are only interested in what sounds good at the time
Nota - Posizione 83
SINISYRA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 87
Leftists want to make us "better" while at the same time denying that there is any such thing as "better"!!
Nota - Posizione 87
CONTRADDIZIONE A SINISTRA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 102
Left/Right difference
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 107
If women are basically Leftist, shouldn't they mostly VOTE Leftist?
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 111
And good old Joe Stalin sure was a motherly, feminine character wasn't he?
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 126
Lakoff's whole idea that political attitudes are formed by childhood experiences with parenting is however just a minor variation on the old "California" theory put forward by the Marxist Adorno
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 165
Lakoff and the feminists
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 214
Steven Pinker has written a good takedown of Lakoff. Excerpt:………….The field of linguistics has exported a number of big ideas to the world. They include the evolution of languages as an inspiration to Darwin for the evolution of species; the analysis of contrasting sounds as an inspiration for structuralism in literary theory and anthropology; the Whorfian hypothesis that language shapes thought; and Chomsky's theory of deep structure and universal grammar. Even by these standards, George Lakoff's theory of conceptual metaphor is a lollapalooza. If Lakoff is right, his theory can do everything from overturning millennia of misguided thinking in the Western intellectual tradition to putting a Democrat in the White House. ...
Nota - Posizione 219
PINKER SU LAKOFF
Nota - Posizione 225
marcare il futuro ci rende miopi? pullman: 4 critiche x' ci affascina associare comportamenti r lingua (sedivy)? x' diciamo lingua e intendiamo cultura
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 225
Keith Chen, Whorfian economist Geoffrey K. Pullum Julie Sedivy Mark Liberman
Nota - Posizione 225
T
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 227
Chen's paper alleges that a certain simple grammatical property of languages correlates robustly with indicators of profligacy and lack of prudence,
Nota - Posizione 228
CHEN: LINGUA E DISSOLUTEXZA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 233
if your language has clear grammatical future tense marking (and thus is a strong future time reference or strong FTR language), then you and your fellow native speakers have a dramatically increased likelihood of exhibiting high rates of obesity, smoking, drinking, debt, and poor pension provision, as if they had little concern for the future.
Nota - Posizione 235
LINGUE CHE MARCANO IL FUTURO E OBESITÀ
Nota - Posizione 245
PROBLEMI GIÀ SULLA CLASSIFICAZIONE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 256
The language of the Pirahã Indians of Brazil, studied by Daniel Everett, has no future tense marking whatever— it is not just weak FTR, it is zero FTR. But, contrary to Chen's prediction, the Pirahã are unconcerned with planning for the future,
Nota - Posizione 258
CASI CONFUTANTI
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 262
I find that I might just as well be convinced that a language with grammatical future tense marking would have speakers who paid MORE attention to worrying about the future.
Nota - Posizione 263
TESI CONTROINTUITIVA PROVE ULTERIORI
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 269
I have some colleagues here at the University of Edinburgh, within Simon Kirby's research group, who have run some informal experiments on the data Chen uses to see if dredging up spurious correlations of this kind is easy or hard,
Nota - Posizione 270
FACILE LA CORRELAZIONE SPURIA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 272
None of these briefly summarized worries about Chen's work, however, disturb me as much as the appalling journalistic misrepresentations that David Berreby offers us. His title is: "Obese? Smoker?
Nota - Posizione 273
GIORNALI BLEAH
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 279
although it is possible in principle to devise empirically testable Whorfian hypotheses (see thediscussion by Barbara Scholz and colleagues here), I wouldn't bet a dime on this particular Whorfian thesis.
Nota - Posizione 281
DIFFICILE TESTARE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 285
Is Your Language Making You Broke and Fat? How Language Can Shape Thinking and Behavior (and How It Can’t) By Julie Sedivy
Nota - Posizione 286
T
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 304
To many people, it’s intuitively obvious that dropping consonants in pronunciation is the mark of a lazy culture, that romancing someone is easiest in a language that’s intrinsically as soothing and soft as French, and that the disciplined German mind is in part a product of the strictly rigid and orderly German language.
Nota - Posizione 306
R MODCIA ITALIA OPERA TEDESCO DISCIPLINA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 307
As noted by Guy Deutscher, in his book Through the Language Glass, “the industrious Protestant Danes have dropped more consonants onto their icy, windswept soil than any indolent tropical tribe.
Nota - Posizione 309
LINGUA PROTESTANTE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 311
Is Italian culture vulnerable to corruption because there is no Italian word that directly translates as accountability?
Nota - Posizione 312
ACCOUNTABILITY IN ITALIANO
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 319
we’d expect more egalitarian cultures to spring from entirely gender-neutral languages like Dari, the variant of Persian that’s spoken in Afghanistan.
Nota - Posizione 320
GENDER NEITRAL CULTURA E LINGUA. AFGHANISTAN
Nota - Posizione 327
EVIDENZE MARGINALI
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 329
I bet you’d find a correlation between tonal languages and the use of chopsticks at mealtimes, simply because both of these spread throughout a particular geographic region.
Nota - Posizione 330
GEOGRAFIA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 332
If language structure has quite a limited effect on the way we think and act, why then do we have these sturdy impressions that some languages are inherently more romantic, slovenly, logical, or fussy than others?
Nota - Posizione 333
DOMANDA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 336
A particularly nice illustration comes from a study by Dirk Akkermans and colleagues, in which bilingual Dutch subjects played a business variant of the Prisoner’s Dilemma game, intended to test the degree of cooperative versus competitive behavior. (The game is set up so that you reap the highest profits if both you and your partner choose a cooperative strategy of keeping prices for your products high, and the lowest profits if you play cooperatively but your partner chooses to undersell you.) Half of the subjects played the game in English, and half played the game in Dutch—the idea being that the English language is more closely associated with highly individualistic and competitive cultures than Dutch.
Nota - Posizione 340
GIOCO DEL PRIGIONIERO IN DUE LINGUE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 341
the effects of language on strategy choice really depended on how much direct exposure to Anglophone culture the subjects had.
Nota - Posizione 342
ESITO
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 345
Actual proficiency in English had no discernible impact.
Nota - Posizione 345
MA
Nota - Posizione 351
u
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 351
Thought experiments on language and thought Julie Sedivy
Segnalibro - Posizione 351
Nota - Posizione 352
T
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 354
"The explanation in question is almost certain to be false. However, if it were true, it would be incredibly interesting, so we have no choice but to explore it."
Nota - Posizione 355
SULL IPOTESI CHEN
Nota - Posizione 357
IPOTESI
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 357
almost-certainly-false-but-incredibly-interesting-if-true
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 358
The main finding is that there is a robust correlation such that families who speak a language in which future tense marking is classified as obligatory tend to also engage in self-sabotaging behaviors like saving less money, exercising less and smoking more.
Nota - Posizione 359
TESI CHEN RIPETUTA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 362
correlation holds if we look only at families
Nota - Posizione 362
ENFASI SULLA FSMIGLIA X I CTRL
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 363
country of birth and residence, sex and age of family members, family structure, income, number of children, and religion.
Nota - Posizione 363
CONFOUNDS
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 365
Controlling for such variables offers only mild reassurance if any,
Nota - Posizione 365
x UN CONTROLLO SCARSAMENTE UTILE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 366
very similar families would choose to speak different languages
Nota - Posizione 366
X DIVERSITÀ DEI LING IN FAMIGLIA
Nota - Posizione 374
UN PRECEDENTE. LINGUAGGIO CHE TIRA LA CULTURA ANCHE SU CHI APPARTIENE A DIVERSE CULTURE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 378
Rather, it's properly understood as a sociolinguistic phenomenon: Labov suggested that people adopt specific patterns of pronunciation as a way of subconsciously signaling solidarity with a particular community and its attitudinal mindset.
Nota - Posizione 379
L ADESIONE CULTURALE ALLA LINGUA CHE SI SCEGLIE DI PARLARE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 380
vowel-raising had become a sort of identity badge for broadcasting one's attitudes.
Nota - Posizione 381
X MARCHOO D IDENTITÀ
Nota - Posizione 392
X ESP IDEALE IMPRATIC
Nota - Posizione 400
X PAROLE CHE INCENTIVANO
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 400
a well-known study by John Bargh and colleagues has famously shown that you can prime meek behavior by having subjects unscramble sentences laced with words like graciously, respect, and honor, and that undergraduates exposed to words like gray, Florida, and bingoundergo accelerated aging, performing badly on memory tests, and walking more slowly.
Nota - Posizione 403
x PAROLE DEPRIMENTI
 David Beaver has discussed a particularly interesting study in which people were more likely to vote in an election depending on the wording of a question they'd been asked the previous day: If subjects were asked "how important is it to you to be a voter?" they were dramatically more likely to cast their ballot than if they'd been asked "how important is to you to vote?"
Nota - Posizione 405
x INCENTIVARE IL VOTO CON LA PAROLINA

Nota - Posizione 410
x ESP IDEALE PRATICATO: SIMILE AL DILEMMA CON GLI STESSI INCONV (VEDI DOPO)
It's true that you can elicit rude or polite behavior with certain words. But you can also prime behavior with just about any stimuli that elicit social stereotypes—people become more aggressive after seeing images of African Americans, perform better on tests after being primed with thoughts of professors rather than soccer hooligans

Nota - Posizione 418
x LA SPINTA NN È LINGUISTICA MA DERIVA DA ASSOCIAZIONI CYLTURALI
All of this should lead us to worry that our hypothetical research subjects are being primed less by the grammar of their languages, and more by the cultural associations of their languages

Nota - Posizione 423
NN LA GRAMMATICA MA L ASSOCIAZIONE CULTURALE


 But this is puzzling to me. It's not at all clear that this is really a linguistic effect at all. I suspect you would get very similar results if you primed subjects with images of American versus Dutch flags,
Nota - Posizione 439
x SUL DILEMMA X BILINGUISTI
 If we must, perhaps we could refer to such results as socio-Whorfian effects.

Nota - Posizione 441
SOCIOWHORFIAN
Personally, I'm not willing to plunk down any-sized bet that these predictions would come out. If I had to bet any portion of my Language Log royalties, I'd put my money on a socio-Whorfian effect showing an effect of language, but no additional impact of future tense.

Nota - Posizione 449
NO GRAMMATICA

Appello ai giovani: lasciate perdere la politica

La politica ci fa ragionare male.
Inquina le nostre facoltà cognitive. Altro che religione. Chi crede nella forza della ragione sarebbe meglio la trascurasse.
E’ quello che sostiene più o meno esplicitamente Dan Kahan nel saggio “Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm
Un caso clamoroso
… Citizens… are less sharply divided today over the justice of progressive taxation (Moore 2015) than over the evidence that human CO2 emissions are driving up global temperatures (Frankovic 2015)…
In altri termini: le questioni di valore (progressività tassazione) dividono meno che le questioni di fatto (pericolosità del global warming, del nucleare, della libera circolazione delle armi, della deterrenza della pena di morte…).
Un altro caso
… Democrats and Republicans argue less strenuously about whether states should permit "voluntary school prayer" (General Social Survey 2014) than about whether allowing citizens to carry concealed handguns in public increases homicide rates or instead decreases them...
Insomma: sui valori c’è speranza di mettersi d’accordo ma sui fatti proprio no.
In altri termini ancora, la scienza fomenta più litigi della religione.
Molto strano poiché pensavamo che l’arbitrio fosse favorito dalla religione e sconfitto dalla chiarezza delle scienze.
Precisiamo: questa strana inversione dei ruoli è vera solo quando la questione fattuale ha conseguenze nelle policy. la rilevanza politica di una questione ci modifica il cervello.
Si ha un bel dire “partiamo dai fatti”, sono proprio i fatti il terreno di scontro…
… These are admittedly complex questions. But they are empirical ones…
Quando le evidenze sono meno evidenti dei valori, allora tutto è possibile.
La sperimentazione sul campo ha registrato un numero notevole di questioni fattuali in cui la forbice del dissenso è tale da far impallidire le diatribe sui valori…
… safety of deep geologic isolation of nuclear wastes, the health effects of the HPV vaccine for teenage girls; the deterrent impact of the death penalty, the efficacy of invasive forms of surveillance to combat terrorism
Come si spiega la cosa? Con il paradigma del “politically motivated reasoning” (PMR). Cos’è il PMR?…
… policy relevant fact has come to assume a widely recognized social meaning as a marker of membership… groups can be expected to conform…
Aderire a certe posizioni ci iscrive in un gruppo. Poco importa se quelle questioni abbiano un contenuto fattuale che dovrebbe orientare le scelte di una persona ragionevole in un senso o nell’altro.
La scienza puo’ ben poco in un mondo dove il PMR predomina. Questo esperimento è un classico…
… In the study, the subjects… were shown pictures and CVs of scientists, all of whom had been trained at and now held positions at prestigious universities and had been elected to the National Academy of Sciences… The subjects were then asked to indicate how strongly they disagreed or agreed that each one of them was indeed a scientific expert on a disputed societal risk… The positions of the scientists on these issues were manipulated, so that half the subjects believed that scientist held the "high risk" position and half the "low risk"… The direction and strength of the subjects' assessment of the expertise of each scientist turned on out to be highly correlated with whether the position attributed to the scientist matched the one that was predominant among individuals sharing the subjects' cultural out-looks…
Tipico grafico che descrive esperimenti del genere:
pmrp2
In altre parole: un esperto è esperto se la pensa come noi (in certe materie sensibili), e il suo curriculum vale ben poco.
Rimedi?
Quello che viene in mente per primo: studiare, imparare a leggere i numeri, le statistiche i modelli quantitativi…
Sbagliato. Cio’ che si chiama “high numeracy” è irrilevanti in questo genere di distorsioni. Anzi, le amplifica.
Un esempio ben noto sulla questione “quanto è pericoloso il libero accesso alle armi?”…
… subjects highest in Numeracy more accurately construed complex empirical data on the effectiveness of gun control laws but only when the data, properly interpreted, supported the position congruent with their political outlooks…
In altri termini: la dimestichezza con i numeri serve solo ad indebolire le ipotesi “scomode” introducendo una sofisticazione ulteriore. Le ipotesi “comode” vengono invece assunte vere così come sono.
L'intelligenza, anziché correggere le distorsioni del pensiero si mettono al loro servizio rafforzandole.
In questo senso, il profano schierato politicamente è più sensibile al consenso scientifico dello scienziato professionale schierato politicamente.
Conclusione
… politically motivated reasoning, far from reflecting too little rationality, reflects too much
Il problema non è l’ignoranza dell’elettore militante visto che la scienza dell’esperto militante crea distorsioni anche peggiori.
Il problema allora non puo’ essere che la militanza.
La scienza vale a poco se non è accompagnata dall’amore per la verità. Ma la nostra capacità “amorosa” è limitata, almeno a giudicare da come l’amore per la verità conviva male con l’amore per il partito.
A questo punto la vera soluzione è chiara: lasciar perdere la politica. Difficile infatti innamorarsi della politica senza innamorarsi di una posizione politica.

Kahan and the Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm Dan Kahan

Kahan and the Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm
Bryan Caplan
Citation (APA): Caplan, B. (2016). Kahan and the Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm [Kindle Android version]. Retrieved from Amazon.com

Parte introduttiva
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 2
the Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 7
Dan Kahan.
Nota - Posizione 8
....
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 8
Citizens
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 9
are less sharply divided today over the justice of progressive taxation (Moore 2015) than over the evidence that human CO2 emissions are driving up global temperatures (Frankovic 2015).
Nota - Posizione 10
CASO DI DIVIDE ANOMALO
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 10
Democrats and Republicans argue less strenuously about whether states should permit "voluntary school prayer" (General Social Survey 2014) than about whether allowing citizens to carry concealed handguns in public increases homicide rates or instead decreases them...
Nota - Posizione 12
x SECONO DIVIDE SUI FATTI
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 12
These are admittedly complex questions. But they are empirical ones.
Nota - Posizione 12
x LA STRANEZZA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 12
Values
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 13
evidence
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 14
There is no logical reason, in sum, for positions on these
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 15
safety of deep geologic isolation of nuclear wastes, the health effects of the HPV vaccine for teenage girls; the deterrent impact of the death penalty, the efficacy of invasive forms of surveillance to combat terrorism--to
Nota - Posizione 16
x ALTRE QUESTONI FATTUALI DI DISSCVORDO
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 18
explanation is politically motivated reasoning
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 19
policy relevant fact has come to assume a widely recognized social meaning as a marker of membership
Nota - Posizione 19
x IPOTESI PMR
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 20
groups can be expected to conform
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 23
politically motivated reasoning can affect perceptions of scientific consensus.
Nota - Posizione 23
CONSENSO SCIENTIFICO
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 24
In the study, the subjects
Nota - Posizione 24
x IL CURRICULUM NN CONTA SULLE QUEST POLITICHE ESP
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 24
were shown pictures and CVs of scientists, all of whom had been trained at and now held positions at prestigious universities and had been elected to the National Academy of Sciences.
Nota - Posizione 25
c
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 25
The subjects were then asked to indicate how strongly they disagreed or agreed that each one of them was indeed a scientific expert on a disputed societal risk--either
Nota - Posizione 26
c
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 27
The positions of the scientists on these issues were manipulated, so that half the subjects believed that scientist held the "high risk" position and half the "low risk"
Nota - Posizione 28
c
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 29
The direction and strength of the subjects' assessment of the expertise of each scientist turned on out to be highly correlated with whether the position attributed to the scientist matched the one that was predominant among individuals sharing the subjects' cultural out-looks
Nota - Posizione 30
c
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 31
High numeracy--a
Nota - Posizione 31
IRRILEVANTE
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 33
subjects highest in Numeracy more accurately construed complex empirical data on the effectiveness of gun control laws but only when the data, properly interpreted, supported the position congruent with their political outlooks.
Nota - Posizione 34
x ESP CON LA ARMI
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 36
politically motivated reasoning, far from reflecting too little rationality, reflects too much.
Nota - Posizione 37
x CONCLUSIONE. L ISTRUZIONE NN CONTA
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 37
Why wouldn't "being rational if and only if it helps your cause" still count as "too little rationality"?
Nota - Posizione 38
x INTERPRET. ALTERNATIVA. CONTA LA RAZ MA ANCOR DI PIÙ IL VALORE DELLA VERITÀ
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 39
treatment of monetary incentives
Nota - Posizione 40
T
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 42
"incentive compatible designs"--ones that offer monetary "incentives" for "correct" answers"--are externally invalid because they create a reason to form "correct" beliefs
Nota - Posizione 43
x IL DENARO CI SALVERÀ
Evidenzia (giallo) - Posizione 44
On this account, expressive beliefs are what are "real" in the psychology of democratic citizens
Nota - Posizione 45
x MA AHIMÈ LA REALTÀ È DIVERSA

La battaglia dei sessi rivista e corretta

Nel libro “Is There Anything Good About Men?: How Cultures Flourish by Exploiting Men” Roy  Baumeister sviluppa quella che chiama “una teoria radicale sulla differenza tra uomo e donna”. Secondo lui:
… differences are rooted mainly in tradeoffs. If one gender is better at something, the superior ability will probably be linked to being worse at something…
Si parte da una differenza ben più radicale: quella tra umanità e regno animale:
… One of the most important traits that make us human is our ability to create and sustain giant social systems… These systems are called cultures. I shall suggest that cultures routinely exploit men in certain ways, which is to say cultures find men more useful than women for certain tasks.
In sintesi: l’uomo – diversamente dagli animali – convive in gigantesche formazioni sociali che si coordinano grazie alla cultura, una macchina imponente che funziona sacrificando i maschi della comunità.
Si parte osservando che in qualsiasi comunità umana esaminata nel tempo e nello spazio le posizioni di comando sono ad appannaggio dei maschietti. L’uomo domina sempre e ovunque.
… men have long held higher positions in society than women have. Most rulers throughout history have been men. Even today, most countries are governed by groups consisting mostly of men. Elsewhere in society, men rule also: in corporate boardrooms, on town councils; even within families, men seem to have more authority. The Global World Forum recently rated most nations on various dimensions of equality, and it found not a single country in which women generally enjoy superior status over men…
Ma perché questa superiorità? C’è la spiegazione “maschilista”:
… this expanation was accepted nearly everywhere until the twentieth century: that men were naturally superior to women…
E c’è la spiegazione “femminista”:
… The second explanation was a reaction against the first. It said that women were not inferior to men on any meaningful dimension. Possibly women are superior, but definitely not inferior. Therefore, the difference in social standing had to be explained as oppression. Men must somehow be working together to keep women down. Men devised a clever system for themselves, called patriarchy, and they used it to share rewards and to oppress women…
L’ambizione del libro è quella di mediare:
… This book offers a third explanation. It’s not that men are smarter than women (the first theory). It’s not that men are wicked conspirators against women (the second theory). It’s about some basic likes and dislikes. It’s rooted in how men treat other men, and how that is different from the way women relate to other women. It’s about how culture works…
Ci sono alcuni elementi che spiegano perché l’apporto delle donne alla formazione della cultura sia tanto esiguo:
… There were crucial tradeoffs: Women’s relationships were vital for some other things. Just not for constructing large systems, like a market economy, or a large team. Because culture grew out of men’s relationships—including competitiontrading and communicating with strangers, and ample doses of violence—men were always in charge of it…
Oggi alla donna è chiesto di “partecipare” in molte imprese culturali ma si tratta comunque di entrare in un circuito costruito nel tempo dall’uomo. Non esistono significative “società femminili”:
… Women have asked, and occasionally demanded, to be allowed into the giant systems that men built, and to varying degrees they have been let in. Meanwhile, there are hardly any places in the world where men are asking (or demanding) to be allowed into giant social systems built up by women… lack of such female-created social systems is something worth pondering
La tesi per la quale le società in cui viviamo “sfruttino” l’uomo merita di essere chiarita:
… One core interest of the book is to examine how culture exploits men. This does not mean I am denying that culture exploits women too. Many cultures do exploit women, some more than others, and sometimes cruelly…
In altre parole: solo lo sfruttamento della donna è patologico (e viene denunciato) mentre quello dell’uomo è fisiologico (ed è normale trascurarlo).
Nella società creata dai maschi attraverso la cultura, il rapporto tra i sessi non sarebbe conflittuale ma complementare. Il femminismo contemporaneo è di tutt’altro avviso.
… Feminist theory has had the unfortunate side effect of accustoming us all to thinking of gender in terms of conflict: mainly men oppressing women, and men being threatened by female successes. Instead, I think men and women for the most part work together. Any time people work together, there are occasional conflicts, but these are not the main story. One goal of this book is to reinterpret the relations between men and women as more cooperative and complementary than antagonistic…
Le tesi femministe sembrerebbero implicare un certo complottismo patriarcale. Eppure non sembra che per gli uomini la donna sia “il nemico”, questo anche osservandoli quando stanno soli tra loro. Riferisce uno psicologo.
He identified himself as a group therapist who had been conducting all-male group therapy sessions for more than twenty years. He said something that has stuck with me ever since. In all those years of men’s groups, he had never once heard any group of men talk about women as the enemy
Oggi è difficile comunicare con i gruppi femministi, molti di loro sembrano aver sacrificato la verità alla militanza. Nel movimento c’è un senso di purezza che va a detrimento del confronto serio.
… I strongly suspect there is no point in debating with feminists… The business of feminism was aptly summarized by Daphne Patai and Noretta Koertge, two scholars who have spent their careers in Women’s Studies programs and who wrote a thoughtful book, Professing Feminism,… most feminists do not pay any attention to criticisms from non-feminists. They listen a little bit to criticism from each other—but that mainly concerns the purity of their commitment to feminist politics and doctrine…
E’ difficile discutere con chi fa campagna contro gli urinatoi o con chi vede la convivenza un modo per “andare a letto con il nemico”.
Negli anni 70, con la conquista dei diritti molti “capi storici” del femminismo hanno mollato i posti di comando ritenendo la missione compiuta. A questo punto un certo  radicalismo a suo tempo marginale ha preso le redini del movimento.
… Many of us, especially those of us past a certain age, have affectionate memories of the feminist movement in the 1970s. We associated feminism with promoting equality… These days many people associate feminism with something quite different, even the opposite: promoting women at the expense of men, defending dogmas, stifling new thought, and deploring men…
La parabola del femminismo contemporaneo è stata già raccontata:
… In her book Who Stole Feminism? Christina Hoff Sommers argued that the feminist movement had indeed changed from a men-welcoming, idealistic movement promoting one kind of utopia into an antagonistic and often stridently anti-male movement…
Forse il conflitto tra i sessi è sopravvalutato:
… I said that the hostility between the sexes had been overstated. I mentioned as an example the women’s suffrage movement. I pointed out that women got the vote because a majority of men, only men, voted to extend the vote to women… men had essentially welcomed women with open arms and affirmative action…
Oggi chi parla di “oppressione” e “discriminazione” non è quasi mai chiamato a giustificare le sue affermazioni roboanti, le si prende per buone, o comunque le si considera accettabili. Un caso di scuola è quello che riguarda il gap negli stipendi.
… oppression hypothesis routinely has taken a beating. There are multiple possible explanations for the gender salary gap, and several have much clearer support than oppression. Men are more likely than women to work full-time rather than part-time. On average across the population, men are more ambitious than women. They work harder and put in hundreds more hours per year. Men are less likely than women to take a few years off during the crucial career-building years of their thirties. Men take bigger risks than women. Men are more willing to sacrifice other sorts of career benefits, such as freedom from travel requirements, low stress, and even personal safety, for a higher salary. Men are more likely than women to negotiate for a higher salary. All these contribute to higher male salaries…
Un altro caso lampante riguarda la preferenza per i figli maschi.
… parents were more likely to have another child if their first or previous child had been a girl than a boy. The explanation given at that time was that parents really want sons, and so if they have a girl, they regard the reproductive event as a failure… What they said, and what research evidence also shows (if anyone had bothered to look before attributing parental choices to sexism), is that girl babies are generally easier than boy babies… Boy babies are more trouble. They scream and cry more often than girl babies, and louder too. (Incidentally, this well-documented finding has been recognized as an important challenge to the conventional claim that females are more emotional than males.) Once they start crawling and walking, they get into things. They make bigger messes. They climb the furniture and pull the draperies. They fight with other kids. Parents who have boys think, this is difficult. Let’s not have any more of these… Recently I visited China. The preference for boys there is well entrenched in the culture and it is hard to deny that there is overt preference, to the point of prejudice… Yet even there, it may be overly hasty to attribute these attitudes to oppression and prejudice. My Chinese colleagues pointed out that Chinese tradition and law stipulate that a son is responsible for taking care of his parents in their old age. A daughter is not… The law and tradition are themselves quite relevant to one theme of this book. Males are required to support their parents, while females are exempt from this requirement…
La selezione naturale opera anche tra gruppi cosicché la cultura è decisiva. Le culture vincenti hanno chiaramente attribuito ruoli differenti a uomini e donne. Ma perché non il matriarcato?
… It has been tried. Unfortunately, those matriarchal cultures and societies did not stand the test of time. There is probably a good reason. In fact, I shall suggest that women can rule, and even quite effectively. But usually they don’t. It’s not a matter of competence or capability. More likely, it has to do with the willingness to take the risks and make the sacrifices
Ma cos’è la cultura?
… In other writings, I have gone so far as to conclude that culture is humankind’s biological strategy. It is how people attempt to solve the basic biological problems that all species face: survival and reproduction. We have culture, a system that shares information, coordinates different tasks, and increases wealth… In short, cultures have challenges. To survive, they must use their men and women effectively…
Ma come si fa a dire che l’uomo è sfruttato se è praticamente a capo di tutto? E’ questo che si chiede scandalizzata la femminista. Solo la donna ha diritto di lamentarsi.
… How, indeed, can we say that men are exploited by society? On the one hand, it is true that men dominate society. They occupy the vast majority of power positions as presidents, prime ministers, and other rulers… Most large corporations are headed by men… In short, and to oversimplify, men run the world… Feminist gets quite angry at any insistence that culture victimizes men…
Noi guardiamo solo “in alto”. Perché qualche volta non guardiamo anche “in basso”? Per esempio nelle prigioni, nel braccio della morte, per strada tra i barboni, nei lavori più rischiosi, al cimitero tra i morti sul lavoro, nelle aule giudiziarie, sul campo di battaglia…
… The mistake in that way of thinking is to look only at the top of society and draw conclusions about society as a whole. Yes, there are mostly men at the top. But if you look at the bottom, really at the bottom, you’ll find mostly men there… Look at the prisons, for example… There are almost no women ever on Death Row… (Imagine if our society were half as indignant about the police engaging in gender profiling as it is about their racial profiling!)… Warren Farrell documented this in his book The Myth of Male Power. When men and women are convicted of the same crimes, the men get much longer prison sentences than the women… Another group at the bottom of society is the homeless. More men than women are homeless. In fact, for many years homeless people were almost exclusively men… When homeless people were almost entirely men, they were regarded as immoral trash, and they were called bums and tramps… study on homelessness concluded that about 15% are women… death on the job… Society needs people to do all its various jobs, and some of those jobs are dangerous. Somebody has to climb out on the roof, or exchange gunfire with the criminals, or run into burning buildings, or sail the stormy seas to rescue the desperate, or even just drive cars and trucks on the busy or dark roads that kill so many. Some of those people will end up injured or, in the worst case, killed… 92% of Americans who die in the line of work are men. This is true despite the fact that there are almost as many women as men employed in America…One more spot at the bottom deserves mention: being killed in battle… These casualties have overwhelmingly been men. That’s changing, one might say. Women are entering combat and sharing the risk. Although correct, it is beside the point. Women’s progress in sharing the risk of combat death is accompanied by women sharing many of the rewards that society has also, such as prestigious and well-paying jobs. Plus, women’s progress into high-paying jobs has been faster than their progress into risk and danger… In 2007, the Iraq war passed the sad milestone of 3,000 American deaths (including everything from being shot in combat to being killed in a traffic accident). Of those dead soldiers, 2,938 were men. The 62 women comprised about 2% of the deaths…
Nella nostre società (ovunque e sempre) i maschietti sono carne da cannone. Il perché è anche intuitivo:
… The idea has several roots, some as deep as the basic ability to make babies for the next generation, to enable cultures to compete simply by outnumbering their rivals: a culture needs only a few men but as many women as possible…
Fare l’uomo non è un pic-nic. Lo sa bene Norah Vincent:
… One of the most interesting books about gender in recent years was by Norah Vincent. She was a lesbian feminist who with some expert help could pass for a man, and so she went undercover, living as a man in several different social spheres for the better part of a year. The book, Self-Made Man, is her memoir. She is quite frank that she started out thinking she was going to find out how great men have it and write a shocking feminist expose of the fine life that the enemy (men) was enjoying. Instead, she experienced a rude awakening of how hard it is to be a man… She was glad when it was over, and in fact she cut the episode short in order to go back to what she concluded was a greatly preferable life as a woman…
Se oggi leggiamo il giornale rileviamo un clamoroso “doppiopesismo”:
…  If you follow the popular media, you see and hear plenty about the gender gap in pay and the general unfairness about women earning less than men. Meanwhile, you will see and hear very little about the gender gap in occupational death
Eppure, non siamo affatto sconvolti da questo fatto. Perché? Perché nella cultura maschile “colpire la donna” è patologico mentre “colpire l’uomo” è fisiologico. Sì, fisiologico: la cultura costruita dai maschi richiede sacrifici umani maschili.
L’uomo è e deve essere più colpito perché è nelle sue corde prendersi più rischi materiali (… tanto va la gatta al lardo…). Tutto questo ha una conseguenze: l’uomo riceve i premi materiali maggiori (… chi non risica non rosica…). Non chiamatelo “privilegio” però, chiamatelo “trade-off”. 
… Confronted with such tradeoffs, men and women tend to see different tipping points. I’m sure it is possible to pay the average woman enough extra to make her willing to take more risk. But the average man will take that same risk for a smaller increase in salary… Many research studies have shown that men put more emphasis on money when choosing jobs and careers than women do. As a result, these men earn more than the women who took the safer careers… Taking and doing those dangerous jobs is thus one thing men are good for
Guia_Besana_03