Visualizzazione post con etichetta scuola. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta scuola. Mostra tutti i post

mercoledì 29 novembre 2017

Babbo natale a scuola

Babbo natale a scuola

Perché per natale non regaliamo le scuole agli insegnanti?
Scuole del genere – gestite dai docenti – sono sempre esistite nella storia, e hanno anche fatto bene.
Viviamo un’epoca che nella scuola butta invano un fracco di risorse. Qualcosa bisogna fare!
Questo anche se la scuola è la “vacca sacra” della società secolarizzata.
L’efficienza delle scuole (risultati/investimenti) è al tracollo.
tentativi per tappare la falla sono stati vani: aumentare i titoli richiesti agli insegnanti, collegare gli stipendi al “merito”, ridurre il numero di allievi per classe, diversificare i programmi, lasciar scegliere la scuola pubblica che si desidera.
L’esito è sempre lo stesso: più risorse ingoiate a parità di risultati, dove i risultati sono i punteggi nei test di aritmetica e lettura a fine ciclo.
Occorre più mercato.
Le soluzioni di mercato a disposizione: esternalizzazione dei servizi (affidamento della scuola a società esterne), buoni-scuola, autonomia spinta (cogestione), homeschooling.
L’esperienza ci dice che la scuola commerciale implica un miglioramento esponenziale dell’efficienza.
Ma c’è un problema: misure del genere vengono osteggiateda molti agguerriti “interessi particolari”.
In primo luogo, i sindacati degli insegnanti. Ma anche dai burocrati del ministero, dalle associazioni genitori-docenti e dai consigli di istituto.
Si tratta di gruppi che, in mancanza di un vero responsabile, riescono ad estrarre una rendita dal sistema “incustodito” come si presenta ora.
La soluzione proposta (trasformare la scuola in una società commerciale e distribuire le azioni al corpo docente e non solo) implicherebbe un vantaggio economico per i maggiori oppositori della privatizzazione, allentandone la resistenza.
Ma implicherebbe anche una loro responsabilizzazione: fine delle vuote chiassate piazzaiole.
Sarà loro dovere rendere la scuola più efficiente, pena fallimento, azzeramento nel valore dei titoli in portafoglio e spostamento dell’utenza altrove.
L'immagine può contenere: una o più persone

martedì 28 novembre 2017

Can Teachers Own Their Own Schools?: New Strategies for Educational Excellence Richard K. Vedder

Can Teachers Own Their Own Schools?: New Strategies for Educational Excellence
Richard K. Vedder and Chester E. Finn Jr.
Last annotated on Tuesday November 28, 2017
51 Highlight(s) | 30 Note(s)
Yellow highlight | Page: 1
1 Introduction
Note:1@@@@@@@

Yellow highlight | Page: 1
an idea with strong historical roots
Note:TOPS TEACHER OWNED FOR PROFIT SCHOOL

Yellow highlight | Page: 1
evidence that it was improving literacy.
Yellow highlight | Page: 1
despite a huge increase in resources devoted to public schooling.
Note:OGGI

Yellow highlight | Page: 1
declined significantly.
Note:EFFICIENZA

Yellow highlight | Page: 1
strengthened teacher certification, merit pay, decentralized management, reduced class size, public-school choice and curricular innovation (e.g., whole language approach, block scheduling, Core Knowledge)
Note:PRECEDENTI RIFORME NULL HYP

Yellow highlight | Page: 1
more market-based approaches
Note:DI COSA C È BSOGNO...SEGUE LISTA DEO TENTATIVI

Yellow highlight | Page: 1
outsourcing
Yellow highlight | Page: 1
vouchers
Yellow highlight | Page: 1
charter
Yellow highlight | Page: 2
home.
Yellow highlight | Page: 2
for-profit education
Yellow highlight | Page: 2
productivity improves.
Yellow highlight | Page: 2
vouchers, independent charter schools, home schooling) have been fought bitterly by groups with a special interest
Note:IL MOTIVO DELLA NUOVA PROPOSYA

Yellow highlight | Page: 2
teacher unions,
Yellow highlight | Page: 2
department bureaucracies,
Yellow highlight | Page: 2
PTAs,
Yellow highlight | Page: 2
school boards
Yellow highlight | Page: 2
potential of financial rewards for teachers
Note:LA NOVITA DI TOPS

Yellow highlight | Page: 2
In return for a transfer of wealth to these employees, they would be invited, tempted, or, under some scenarios, obliged to go along with a shift to competitive for-profit delivery systems.
Note:LO SCAMBIO

Yellow highlight | Page: 2
Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs)
Note:GIÀ DIFFUSE...EPOS

Yellow highlight | Page: 2
for primary and secondary
Yellow highlight | Page: 21
5 For-Profit Education in America Today
Note:5@@@@@@@

Yellow highlight | Page: 21
Skeptics of for-profit education might argue that this is an untried approach that, however appealing in theory, has no basis in experience.
Note:L OBIEZIONE

Yellow highlight | Page: 21
the fastest growing form of education
Note:IL PROFIT OGGI

Yellow highlight | Page: 21
twenty-two companies operated
Yellow highlight | Page: 21
Their market capitalization was an impressive $7.4 billion
Note:CAPITALIZZAZ

Yellow highlight | Page: 21
had an earnings increase
Note:RICAVI CHE CRESCONO PIÙ DELLA MEDIA

Yellow highlight | Page: 22
One respected market analyst, Michael T. Moe of Merrill Lynch, predicts that education management companies will handle 10 percent of K–12 public school spending within ten to fifteen years.
Note:PREVISIONE

Yellow highlight | Page: 24
Private School Performance
Yellow highlight | Page: 24
In general, private schools have higher levels of student performance and lower expenditure levels than public schools.
Note:IN GENERALE

Yellow highlight | Page: 24
data from Ohio
Yellow highlight | Page: 24
1999,
Yellow highlight | Page: 24
41 percent of the public school children failed
Note:ITALIANO

Yellow highlight | Page: 24
21 percent, for private
Yellow highlight | Page: 24
32 percent of public school children failed,
Note:MATH

Yellow highlight | Page: 24
14 percent of private
Yellow highlight | Page: 24
they put a greater emphasis on academics and achieve
Note:SCUOLE CATTOLICHE

Yellow highlight | Page: 24
achieve more with far lower costs
Note:COSTI BASSI

Yellow highlight | Page: 24
costs half as much per pupil
Yellow highlight | Page: 24
The most extensive experiment with using public funds to finance private school education has occurred in Milwaukee,
Note:ESPERIMENTI

Yellow highlight | Page: 24
The random choice of recipients is a boon to researchers
Note:RICERCA

Yellow highlight | Page: 24
randomly chosen students do better in private than in public schools.
Note:RISULTATO

Yellow highlight | Page: 24
Harvard’s Paul Peterson
Yellow highlight | Page: 26
Cecilia E. Rouse
Yellow highlight | Page: 26
The evidence is not unanimous.
Note:@@@@@@@@@@@

Yellow highlight | Page: 27
6 Illustrating The “ESOP” Approach to Public Education
Note:6@@@@@@@@@@@

Yellow highlight | Page: 27
how to get from a government run schooling system to an entrepreneurial, for-profit system.
Note:IL PASSAGGIO

Yellow highlight | Page: 27
privatize the school by giving its ownership to its teachers, principals and staff. Other stakeholders—notably parents—might also receive ownership
Note:L IDEA BASE

Yellow highlight | Page: 27
schools could be sold to existing for-profit corporations with a proviso that teachers,
Note:ALTEENATIVA

Yellow highlight | Page: 28
The district announces that it will give 100 shares of the relevant common stock to each teacher for each year
IL COMPENSO INIZIALE

giovedì 26 ottobre 2017

Cinque ragioni per non dare più un euro al sistema dell’istruzione

Cinque ragioni per non dare più un euro al sistema dell’istruzione

Sono sempre stato un grande fan dei buoni scuola, in realtà se fossi il dittatore supremo in carica da lunedì abolirei la scuola di stato per passare ad un sistema basato al 100% sui voucher.
Una scuola di stato non ha più senso di una chiesa di stato.
Non mi illudo con questo di ottenere un gran miglioramento del profitto scolastico o un balzo significativo nell’esito dei test ma nemmeno penso che sia questo il metro giusto per misurare una buona riforma. Il metro giusto è la “customer satisfaction“.

Il passaggio ai buoni scuola consente di 1)mantenere o migliorare gli attuali livelli di apprendimento dimezzando i costi e 2) fare felici le famiglie.
So bene che queste intenzioni sono utopiche, in cerca di una mossa alternativa ipotizzo il bloccototale e perpetuo di finanziamento del sistema attuale.
***
Se un politico italiano dice “più  risorse alla scuola” voi come reagite?
Probabilmente reagite bene, vi sentireste compiaciuti di vivere in un paese tanto civile. Ma se solo aveste a cuore il bene verso il vostro prossimo dovreste reagire male, molto male. Dovresteindignarvi!
Perché? Per almeno cinque motivi.
Primo, è difficile fare del bene investendo nei paesi ricchi come il nostro, e noi siamo ricchissimi rispetto al resto dell’umanità.
Secondo, non sappiamo molto su come migliorare il profitto scolastico. E’ un campo di studi incasinatissimo dove domina l’ “ipotesi nulla”.
Terzo, non sappiamo molto se avere studenti migliori valga la penaRicchezza prodotta e investimenti nell’istruzione sembrano variabili decisamente scollegate. La scuola spesso si limita a 1) selezionare i migliori (avaibility bias), 2) segnalare i migliori (signalling bias) e 3) conferire benefici indiretti (conoscenze professionali e romantiche). Alla reale formazione resta ben poco.
Quarto, è oggettivamente difficile aspettarsi qualcosa dalle ricerche future. Innanzitutto è coinvolto in prima persona personale che nella scuola/università ci campa e ha quindi un palese conflitto di interessi. Poi è un ambito in cui è difficile applicare i metodi migliori della ricerca sociale, per esempio il “random trial”, tipico dei test sui medicinali.
Quinto, l’istruzione è una causa molto popolare. Di conseguenza, come per tutte le cause popolari, si riversano su di essa molti più fondi di quanti ne meriti.
scuola

giovedì 10 agosto 2017

L’ élitismo dei poveri


L’ élitismo dei poveri


That Was No Discovery After All – The Beautiful Tree: A personal journey into how the world’s poorest people are educating themselves – James Tooley
***
Trigger warning: –  l’istruzione privata funziona per i ricchi. Ma per i poveri? – perché i poveri di tutto il mondo si rivolgono prevalentemente al privato per la loro istruzione? – due pregiudizi sull’ istruzione privata –  tutti vedono senza guardare in faccia la realtà della scuile del terzo mondo – la trasparenza del privato come carta vincente nella concorrenza pubblico/privato – le analisi reticenti, due casi esemplari: Sen e Oxfam – fatti riconosciuti e non valorizzati: l’arte di nascondere quel che succede –
***
the private schools might be there, some might even be better than the public schools, but that’s only because they are selective. “They take the cream of the cream,”
Note:IL PREGIUDIZIO CANONICO SULLE SCUOLE PROVATE
“Most of the schools are shocking, there is a shocking turnover of teachers, they’re not trained, they’re not committed, and the proprietors know that they can simply get others because there is a long list of people waiting to come in.”
Note:SECONDO PREGIUDIZIO
For Sajitha it was clear: if many—or even a few—parents had higher aspirations for their children and wanted to send them to private schools, then “they should not be allowed to do so, because this is unfair.” It’s unfair because it makes it even worse for those left behind.
Note:PROIBIZIONISMO… LEFT BEHIND
It was one thing to argue that “education for all” could be secured only through public education supported by international aid if you were unaware of private schools for the poor. But as soon as you knew that many poor parents were exiting the state system to send their children to private schools, then surely this must register on your radar as being worthy of comment in the “education for all” debate?
Note:LA COSA PIÙ SCONCERTANTE
India, enrollment in primary private schools was already above 30 percent, and there was “a further acceleration” of the numbers by the late 1990s, “especially in areas where public schools are in bad shape.” In urban areas, the trend was even more startling, with the proportion in private schools estimated at 80 percent or more. As I read this, it seemed hard to reconcile these statements with the notion that private schools were patronized mainly by the elite—
Note:DATI PER L‘INDIA
Rather than further explore their choices, Sen criticized poor parents for making them: in villages in Uttar Pradesh, he wrote, poor parents’ response to nonfunctioning public schools was “to send their sons” to study in “private schools.”
Note:AMARTYA SEN
A major source of Sen’s evidence was the Public Report on Basic Education (the PROBE Report)… It too was clear that “even among poor families and disadvantaged communities, one finds parents who make great sacrifices to send some or all of their children to private schools…
Note:FONTE
The PROBE team’s findings on the quality of public schools were even more startling.
QUALITÁ
So what was the secret of success in these private schools for the poor? The report was very clear: “In a private school, the teachers are accountable to the manager (who can fire them), and, through him or her, to the parents (who can withdraw their children). In a government school, the chain of accountability is much weaker,
Note:COSA RENDE MIGLIORE IL PRIVATO?
I read the summaries at the beginning and end of The Oxfam Education Report, a standard textbook for development educationalists, and again I found only the accepted wisdom that governments and international agencies must meet the educational needs of the poor.
Note:ALTRA FONTE RETICENTE
But then again, hidden away in a chapter titled “National Barriers to Basic Education,” was the extraordinary (but downplayed) observation: “The notion that private schools are servicing the needs of a small minority of wealthy parents is misplaced. . . . It is interesting to note that a lower-cost private sector has emerged to meet the demands of poor
Note:TENUTO BEN NASCOSTO
That poor parents in some of the most destitute places on this planet are flocking to private schools because public schools are inadequate and unaccountable seemed to me to be hugely significant territory for development experts to concede.
Note:UN FATTO RICONOSCIUTO MA NON VALORIZZATO
exploring this conundrum that something the poor were doing for themselves seemed to be systematically ignored by development experts
Note:L’ENIGMA
He told me: “The governor asked me, “Why are you putting your energies into building schools? Leave it to the Ministry of Education.” But if we waited for government it would take 20 years. We need schools now.”
Note:PROFESSOR SULEYMAN… SOMALILAND
We visit one at the foot of the hill, Ubaya-binu-Kalab School, with 1,060 students, charging monthly fees of 12,000 Somaliland shillings, about $5. The owner told me that 165 of the students attended for free, the poor again subsidizing the poorest.
Note:POVERI E POVERISSIMI
I was ready to start the research—promising to examine in more depth the phenomenon of private schools for the poor in India, in a range of African countries, and in China, too. TheJohn Templeton Foundation was taking a risk:
2003 ANNO MAGICO

venerdì 7 luglio 2017

Dedonmilanesizziamo la laurea!

Dedonmilanesizziamo la laurea!

College has been oversold – Launching The Innovation Renaissance: A New Path to Bring Smart Ideas to Market Fast – Alex Tabarrok
***
Tesi: l’alluvione di matricole nuoce al sistema, l’università di massa è una iattura.
***
Looking at the flood of students on college and university campuses, the education stagnation isn’t obvious.65 Enrollment is at an all-time high, and a greater percentage of high school graduates than ever will attend college.66 Look below the surface, however, and the stagnation remains.
Note:STAGNAZIONE EDUCATIVA E ALLUVIONE DI MATRICOLE
Only 35 percent of students in a four-year degree program will graduate within four years, and less than 60 percent will graduate within six years.
Note:POCHI IN CORSO
A college degree does pay for most people. College graduates earn about double what high school graduates earn, and high school graduates earn significantly more than dropouts… In 2010, the unemployment rate among high school dropouts was close to 15 percent; it was about 5 percent for college graduates. More education is even associated with better life satisfaction, lower divorce rates and less criminality,
COLLEGE PREMIUM
College has been oversold, and in the process the amount of education actually going on in college has declined as colleges have dumbed down classes and inflated grades to accommodate students who would be better off in apprentice and on-the-job training programs. As the number of students attending college has grown, the number of workers with university education but high school jobs has increased. Baggage porters and bellhops don’t need college degrees, but in 2008 17.4 percent of them had at least a bachelor’s degree and 45 percent had some college education.
Note:EDUCAZIONE DI MASSA E SVALUTAZIONE DELLA LAUREA
More than half of the college graduates in the humanities end up in jobs that do not require a college degree. Not surprisingly, these graduates do not get a big “college bonus.”
Note:LAURAETI NON COLLOCATI
It may seem odd that at the same time that the United States is failing to get people through high school, it is also pushing too many students into college. But let’s compare the situation with Germany’s. As we said earlier, 97 percent of German students graduate from high school, but only a third of these students go on to college. In the United States we graduate fewer students from high school, but nearly two-thirds of those we graduate go to college, almost twice as many as in Germany.73 So are German students undereducated? Not at all… It’s not just Germany that uses apprenticeship and training programs. In Austria, Denmark, Finland, the Netherlands, Norway and Switzerland between 40 to 70 percent of students opt for an educational program that combines classroom and workplace learning….
Note:GERMANIA E SCUOLE PROFESSIONALI
The U.S. has paved a single road to knowledge, the road through the classroom. “Sit down, stay quiet, and absorb. Do this for 12 to 16 years,” we tell the students,
Note:LA SCUOLA UNICA
American students are also not studying the fields with the greatest potential for increasing economic growth. In 2009 the U.S. graduated 37,994 students with bachelor’s degrees in computer and information science. Not bad, but here is the surprise: We graduated more students with computer science degrees 25 years ago! In comparison, the U.S. graduated 89,140 students in the visual and performing arts in 2009 — more than double the number of 25 years ago! Figure three shows some of the relevant data. Few fields have been as revolutionized in recent years as microbiology, but in 2009 we graduated just 2,480 students with bachelor’s degrees in microbiology — about the same number as 25 years ago. Who will solve the problem of antibiotic resistance? The U.S. graduated just 5,036 chemical engineers in 2009, no more than we did 25 years ago. In electrical engineering there were 11,619 graduates in 2009, about half the number of 25 years ago. In mathematics and statistics there were 15,496 graduates in 2009, slightly more than the 15,009 graduates of 1985. In comparison, the U.S. graduated just under 40,000 students in psychology 25 years ago but nearly 95,000 today. Perhaps most oddly, the number of students in journalism (!) and communications has nearly doubled in 25 years, rising to 83,109 graduates in 2009. Ask your bellhop for more details. Bear in mind that over the past 25 years the total number of students in college has increased by about 50% so the number of graduates in science, technology, engineering and mathematics has stagnated even as the total number of students has increased. Figure Three: Math and Science Degrees have Stagnated… There is nothing wrong with the arts, psychology and journalism, but graduates in these fields are less likely to find work in their field than graduates in computer science, microbiology and chemical engineering.
Note:LE LAUREE SBAGLIATE
Economic growth is not a magic totem to which all else must bow, but it is the primary reason we subsidize higher education. The wage gains for college graduates go to the graduates — that’s reason enough for students to pursue a college education. We add subsidies on top of the higher wages because we believe that education has positive spillovers, benefits that flow to society. The biggest positive spillover is the increase in innovation… an argument can be made for subsidizing students in fields with potentially large spillovers, such as microbiology, chemical engineering, nuclear physics and computer science. There is little justification for subsidizing sociology, dance and English majors….
Note:TORNIAMO AI FONDAMENTALI: PERCHÈ FINANZIARE L’ UNIVERSITA’?

mercoledì 24 maggio 2017

Ragazzini in difficoltà in una scuola sempre più femminilizzata

La nostra società si sta trasformando in qualcosa di inospitale per i maschietti, la cosa diventa ancora più palese se guardiamo al sistema scolastico sempre meno tollerante verso il rischio, la competitività, il contatto fisico, gli scherzi e l’aggressività virile tipica dei bambini. Della cosa si occupa Christina Hoff Sommers nel suo The War Against Boys: How Misguided Policies are Harming Our Young Men.
La faccio breve: un tempo si riteneva che bambini e bambine necessitassero di stili educativi differenti per dare il massimo, cosicché le classi erano divise per sesso. La cosa sembrava naturale e a dirla tutta l’idea di fondo era tutt’altro che peregrina, senonché, in epoca recente, nel soppesare i pro e i contro, si è preferito andare verso la classe mista. Purtroppo, la classe era mista nella composizione ma non era affatto “mista” nella didattica: lo stile educativo “femminile” si è imposto facendo nascere una serie di problemi nei maschietti.
*** 
A New York c’è una scuola stranissima: l’ Aviation High School in Queens. Cos’ha di particolare? Scatena l’entusiasmo dei maschietti e innalza il loro profitto.
… This is an institution that is working miracles with students. Schools everywhere struggle to keep teenagers engaged. At Aviation, they are enthralled. On a recent visit to Aviation, I observed a classroom of fourteen- and fifteen-year-olds intently focused on constructing miniaturized, electrically wired airplane wings from mostly raw materials. In another class, the students worked in teams—with a student foreman and crew chief—to take apart a small jet engine and then put it back together in just twenty days… The school’s two thousand pupils—mostly Hispanic, African American, and Asian from homes below the poverty line—have a 95 percent attendance rate and an 88 percent graduation rate, with 80 percent attending college… Aviation High lives up to its motto: “Where Dreams Take Flight.” So what is the secret of its success? “The school is all about structure,” Assistant Principal Ralph Santiago told me… anyone who spends a little time at the school sees its success is not about zero-tolerance and strict sanctions. The students are kept so busy and are so fascinated with what they are doing that they have neither the time nor the desire for antics… Despite its seventy-five-year history of success, and despite possessing what seems to be a winning formula for educating at-risk kids, it suffers from what many education leaders consider to be a fatal flaw: the school is 85 percent male… Principal Deno Charalambous, Assistant Principal Ralph Santiago, and other administrators have made efforts to reach out to all prospective students, male and female, but it is mostly boys who respond…
Per questo è presa di mira da certe associazioni: non si pone in modo altrettanto attraente per le ragazze. Una cosa è certa: per farlo dovrebbe snaturarsi rinunciando ad essere quello che oggi è.
D’alto canto, altrove, esiste il problema opposto:
… At the same time, it is girls who are the overwhelming majority at two other New York City vocational schools: the High School of Fashion Industries and the Clara Barton High School (for health professions) are 92 percent and 77 percent female, respectively…
Il fatto è che sia il “problema” dell’Aviation sia quello opposto è relativamente da poco che sono diventati “problemi”. Prima non erano nulla.
Quarant’anni di lotte ma i “problemi sono ancora” tutti lì (nonostante la neutralizzazione delle desinenze):
… Despite forty years of feminist consciousness-raising and gender-neutral pronouns, boys still outnumber girls in aviation and automotive schools, and girls still outnumber boys in fashion and nursing. The commonsense explanation is that sexes differ in their interests and propensities. But activists in groups such as the American Association of University Women and the National Women’s Law Center beg to differ…
Montare e smontare motori d’aereo all’ Aviation agli ordini di un sergente di ferro non sembra il massimo per la bimbetta media newyorkese, e questo per molti è legato al sessismo delle scuole professionali:
… Marcia Greenberger, along with two activist lawyers, wrote a letter… “The vocational programs offered at these schools correspond with outmoded and impermissible stereotypes on the basis of sex.” The letter noted that “even the names assigned to vocational high schools send strong signals to students that they are appropriate only for one sex or the other.”…
Come si applica l’uguaglianza di opportunità nelle scuole? Alcuni guardano alle possibilità aperte, altri alla partecipazione effettiva. E’ chiaro che i secondi hanno un problema con l’Aviation:
…  The educators at Aviation define equity as “equality of opportunity”—girls are just as welcome as boys. They were frankly baffled by the letters and threats and seemed to think it was just a misunderstanding. But the activists at the National Women’s Law Center, as well as the authors of the Blue School, Pink School report, believe that true equity means equality of participation…
Per molto tempo il femminismo ha insistito su una frode: il sistema scolastico penalizzava le femminucce
… Mary Pipher’s bleak tidings in her bestselling book, Reviving Ophelia: Saving the Selves of Adolescent Girls. According to Pipher, “Something dramatic happens to girls in early adolescence. . . . They crash and burn.”…
Fu condotta una ricerca imponente per supportare un vasto programma di “femminilizzazione” delle scuole e toh, sorpresa: il problema era quello inverso, erano i ragazzini ad arrancare.
Le femminucce sono più attive, più ambiziose, più vogliose di partecipare, più inclini ad andare all’università, più resistenti nel terminare gli studi… senza dire che leggono e scrivono meglio…
Fu uno shock per il mondo femminista che non riusciva a capire: ma i maschietti non hanno punteggi più elevati nei test? Eppure la risposta non era difficile:
… Fewer males than females take the SAT (46 percent of the test takers are male) and far more of the female test takers come from the “at risk” category—girls from lower-income homes or with parents who never graduated from high school or never attended college… There is another factor that skews test results. Nancy Cole, former president of the Educational Testing Service, calls it the “spread” phenomenon. Scores on almost any intelligence or achievement test are more widely distributed for boys than for girls—boys include more prodigies and more students of marginal ability. Or, as the late political scientist James Q. Wilson once put it, “There are more male geniuses and more male idiots.” The boys of marginal ability tend not to take the SAT…
Il “vasto programma” dovette essere abbandonato tra i rimpianti. Purtroppo, per i problemi veri emersi a sorpresa – la disaffezione dei maschietti verso la scuola - non c’era nessun programma e nessuno ne sentiva l’esigenza:
… But what is hard to understand is why the math and science gap launched a massive movement on behalf of girls, and yet a much larger gap in reading, writing, and school engagement created no comparable effort for boys…
Ma che fine fanno i nostri figli maschi? Nelle scuole una brutta fine. Sono le ragazze a comandare.
… College admissions officers were baffled, concerned, and finally panicked over the dearth of male applicants. A new phrase entered the admissions office lexicon: “the tipping point”—the point at which the ratio of women to men reaches 60/40. According to insider lore, if male enrollment falls to 40 percent or below, females begin to flee. Officials at schools at or near the tipping point (American University, Boston University, Brandeis University, New York University, the University of Georgia, and the University of North Carolina, to name only a few) feared their campuses were becoming like retirement villages, with a surfeit of women competing for a tiny handful of surviving men… In the professional schools, once dominated by men, women were earning 57 percent of degrees in law, 62 percent in dentistry, 73 percent in optometry, 77 percent in pharmacy, and 82 percent in veterinary medicine…
Eppure, chi lancia l’allarme è visto come il paladino della reazione. Si ammette che le ragazze hanno migliorato la loro condizione e si teme che “il sistema reagisca” emarginandole di nuovo. La nuova moda è oscurare i successi e concentrarsi su numeri assoluti e lavoro:
… “More men are earning college degrees today in the United States than at any time in history.” Men have not fallen behind; it is simply that females “have made more rapid gains.”… “Perhaps the most compelling evidence against the existence of a boys’ crisis is that men continue to outearn women in the workplace.”
Senonché:
… It is true that in absolute terms more boys were graduating from high school and going to college in 2005 than in the previous forty years. But that is because the population of college-age males was much larger in 2005 than in the previous forty years…
Un altra strategia è quella di spostare il fuoco dal genere alla razza:
… As one AAUW author told the Washington Post, “If there is a crisis, it is with African American and Hispanic students and low-income students, girls and boys.”51 But here the AAUW obscures the fact that the gender gap favors girls across all ethnic, racial, and social lines. Young black women are twice as likely to go to college as black men…
Ma l’argomento non gira:
… The facts are incontrovertible: young women from poor neighborhoods in Boston, Los Angeles, or Washington, DC, do much better than the young men from those same neighborhoods… Kleinfeld found that 34 percent of Hispanic males with college-educated parents scored “below basic,” compared to 19 percent of Hispanic females…
Quello che inquieta la militante femminista è osservare i vertici della società: il maschio predomina tutt’ora:
… When they look at society as a whole, they see males winning all the prizes. Men still prevail in the highest echelons of power. Look at the number of male CEOs, full professors, political leaders. Or consider the wage gap…
Eppure, l’effetto “spread” spiega questa situazione e la rende compatibile con il declino del maschio…
… There are far more men than women at the extremes of success and failure. And failure is more common… More than one million Americans are classified by the Department of Labor as “discouraged workers.” These are workers who have stopped looking for jobs because they feel they have no prospects or lack the requisite skills and education. Nearly 60 percent are men—636,000 men and 433,000 women. Consider also that that more than 1.5 million (1,500,278) men are in prison. For women the figure is 113,462…
L’altra classica lamentela femminista è il wage gap. Ma anche qui gli elementi concreti a supporto sono pochi.
… The 23-cent gender pay gap is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time…  When mainstream economists consider the wage gap, they find that pay disparities are almost entirely the result of women’s different life preferences—what men and women choose to study in school, where they work, and how they balance their home and career… In addition to differences in education and training, the review found that women are more likely than men to leave the workforce to take care of children or older parents… esempio… “Female doctors are more likely to be pediatricians than higher-paid cardiologists. They are more likely to work part time. And even those working full time put in seven percent fewer hours a week than men. They are also much more likely to take extended leaves…And as economists frequently remind us, if it were really true that an employer could get away with paying Jill less than Jack for the same work, clever entrepreneurs would fire all their male employees, replace them with females, and enjoy a huge market advantage…
Poiché simili verità appaiono ormai lampanti non resta che arroccarsi nell’ultima casamatta: lo stereotipo di genere. Le donne scelgono quel che scelgono non guidate dalle loro reali preferenze ma perché sono eterodirette da una cultura maschilista.
Qui si puo’ discutere all’infinito ma andremmo fuori tema. Torniamo a bomba: perché le nostre scuole si sono “femminilizzate” cessando di essere un posto per bambini?
La “pistola fumante” sul punto sembra il differenziale riscontrato tra test e profitto scolastico:
… Boys score slightly better than girls on national math and science tests—yet their grades in those subjects are lower. They perform worse than girls on literacy tests—but their classroom grades are even lower than these test scores predict…
A quanto pare, nella valutazione dell’allievo, gli insegnanti “fattorizzano” la disciplina, un elemento che avvantaggia le bambine:
… Teachers as early as kindergarten factor good behavior into grades—and girls, as a rule, comport themselves far better and are more amenable to classroom routines than boys… “We trace the misalignment of grades and test scores to differences between boys and girls in their non-cognitive development.” Non-cognitive skills include self-control, attentiveness, organization, and the ability to sit still for long periods of time. As most parents know, girls tend to develop these skills earlier… At all stages studied, teachers’ assessments strongly favored the girls. Girls reap large academic benefits from good behavior… The researchers found that boys who possess social skills more commonly found in girls—those who are well-organized, well-behaved, and can sit still—are graded as well or better than girls. But such boys are rare
La conclusione di molti: se i maschietti tendono ad annoiarsi di più a far più casino tanto peggio per loro.
Vero, ma forse, con una scuola differente le cose andrebbero in modo diverson. E qui torniamo al tanto odiato Aviation High School.
… If little boys are restive and unfocused, why not look for ways to help them improve? When we realized that girls, as a group, were languishing behind boys in math and science, we mounted a concerted national effort to give female students more support and encouragement, an effort that has met with significant success…
Così come dobbiamo ammettere che nella società uomini e donne hanno preferenze diverse e carriere diverse, allo stesso modo dobbiamo ammettere che a scuola bambini e bambine hanno esigenze differenti e spesso inconciliabili. Le soluzioni a questa diversità ci sarebbero se solo si volesse porsi il problema della “scuola femminilizzata”.