sabato 25 febbraio 2017

Riassunto complessivo Measuring Up by Daniel M Koretz

Measuring Up by Daniel M Koretz
You have 121 highlighted passages
You have 52 notes
Last annotated on February 24, 2017
Chapter 1 If Only It Were So SimpleRead more at location 69
Note: 1@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ I CINQUE PROBLEMI DI UN TEST Edit
help her identify good schools.Read more at location 71
Note: RICHIESTA Edit
She assumed that because of what I do for a living, I ought to know this.Read more at location 71
the strength of the school’s music or athletic programs, some special curricular emphasis, school size, social heterogeneity, and so on.Read more at location 75
Note: x COSE DA CONSID PRIMA DEI TEST Edit
visit a few schools that looked promising.Read more at location 77
observations and descriptive informationRead more at location 81
She was not pleased. She clearly wanted an answer that was uncomplicatedRead more at location 82
Note: VOGLIA DI SEMPLIFICARE Edit
less ambiguity and complexity.Read more at location 83
They wanted something simpler: the names of the schools with the highest test scores,Read more at location 86
“If all you want is high average test scores, tell your realtor that you want to buy into the highest-income neighborhood you can manage. That will buy you the highest average score you can afford.”Read more at location 88
Note: x LA RISPOSTA AI SEMPLIFICATORI Edit
misunderstandingsRead more at location 90
that scores on a single test tell us all we need to know about studentRead more at location 90
Note: ... Edit
to know about schoolRead more at location 91
Note: c Edit
A third common misconception is that testing is simple and straightforward.Read more at location 92
No Child Left Behind,Read more at location 93
“A reading comprehension test is a reading comprehension test. And a math test in the fourth grade—there’s not many ways you can foul up a test … It’s pretty easy to ‘norm’ the results.”Read more at location 93
Note: x BUSH SEMPLIFICA Edit
this claim was entirely wrong: it is all too easy to foul up the design of a test,Read more at location 96
testing seems so misleadingly simpleRead more at location 103
Testing has become a routine part of our vocabularyRead more at location 106
For many years, Parade magazine has featured a regular column by Marilyn vos Savant, who is declared by the magazine to have the highest IQ in the country. Rather than simply saying that Ms. vos Savant is one damned smart person, if indeed she is, the editors use the everyday vocabulary of “IQ”—justRead more at location 107
Note: X TIPICO EQUIVOCO Edit
very few readers have any idea what an IQ test containsRead more at location 110
another issue: the rhetorical power of testing.Read more at location 112
it is just another way of saying that she is smart. But it does seem to give the assertion more weight, a patina of scientific credibility.Read more at location 112
So what are some of the complications that make testing and the interpretation of scores so much less straightforwardRead more at location 120
At first, they may seem discouragingly numerous.Read more at location 121
test scores usually do not provide a direct and complete measure of educational achievement.Read more at location 129
they are incomplete measures,Read more at location 129
these tests can measure only a subset of the goals of education.Read more at location 131
Note: PRIMA RAG INCOMPL Edit
tests are generally very small samples of behavior that we use to make estimates of students’Read more at location 132
Note: SEC RAGIONE Edit
an achievement test is in many ways like a political poll,Read more at location 134
opinions of a small number of voters are usedRead more at location 134
different tests often provide somewhat inconsistent results.Read more at location 139
Note: CONSEG. PROBLEMA DELL INVALIDITÀ Edit
For example, for more than three decades the federal government has funded a large-scale assessment of students nationwide called the National Assessment of Educational Progress, often simply labeled NAEP (pronounced “nape”), which is widely considered the best single barometer of the achievement of the nation’s youth. There are actually two NAEP assessments, one (the main NAEP) designed for detailed reporting in any given year, and a second designed to provide the most consistent estimates of long-term trends. Both show that mathematics achievement has been improving in both grade four and grade eight—particularly in the fourth grade, where the increase has been among the most rapid nationwide changes in performance, up or down, ever recorded. But the upward trend in the main NAEP has been markedly faster than the improvement in the long-term-trend NAEP. Why? Because the tests measure mathematics somewhat differently,Read more at location 139
Note: x AESEMPIO Edit
When scores have serious consequences, scores on the test that matters often go up far faster than scores on other tests.Read more at location 152
Note: HIGHT STAKE ATTENDIBILITÀ Edit
The experience in Texas during George Bush’s tenure as governor provides a good illustration. At that time, the state used the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS) to evaluate schools, and high-school students were required to pass this test in order to receive a diploma. Texas students showed dramatically more progress on the TAAS than they did on the National Assessment of Educational Progress.Read more at location 153
Note: X ES DEL TEXAS Edit
Even a single test can provide varying results.Read more at location 163
Note: PROBLEMA DELL ATTENDIBILITÀ Edit
Students who take more than one form of a test typically obtain different scores.Read more at location 164
SAT college-admissions test more than once,Read more at location 165
These arise partly because the test forms, while designed to be equivalent, have different content,Read more at location 165
Fluctuations also occur because students have good and bad days:Read more at location 166
too nervous to sleep wellRead more at location 167
it makes no sense to place much faith in small differencesRead more at location 168
Then there is the problem of figuring out how to report performance on a test.Read more at location 171
Note: CALCOLO Edit
Most of us grew up in a school system with some simple but arbitrary rules for grading tests,Read more at location 172
We know that to obtain a grade of “A” can require much more in one class than in another.Read more at location 174
Psychometricians therefore have had to create scales for reporting performance on tests.Read more at location 175
various scalesRead more at location 179
Note: ... RAPPRESENTAZIONE Edit
provide differing views of performance.Read more at location 180
Note: c Edit
Further, sometimes a test does not function as it should. A test may be biased,Read more at location 180
For example, a mathematics test that requires reading complex text and writing long answers may be biased against immigrant students who are competent in mathematics but have not yet achieved fluency in English.Read more at location 181
Note: x BIAS IMMIGRATI Edit
bias must be distinguished from simple differences in performanceRead more at location 183
For instance, if poor students in a given city attend inferior schools, a completely unbiased test is likely to give them lower scores because the inferior teaching they received impeded their learning.Read more at location 184
Note: x IMBARAZZO X I TEST NN BIAS Edit
For example, the assessment designs that are best for providing descriptive information about the performance of groups (such as schools, districts, states, or even entire nations) are not suitable for systems in which the performance of individual students must be compared. Adding large, complex, demanding tasks to an assessment may extend the range of skills you can assess, but at the cost of making information about individual students less trustworthy.Read more at location 190
Note: x NN ESISTE IL TEST OTTIMO. ESEMPIO. IL SETTING VARIA AL VARIARE DEGLI SCOPI Edit
principles of testing are beyond the reach of most people.Read more at location 201
Note: t Edit
validity, reliability, bias, scaling, and standard setting,Read more at location 204
Note: CONCETTI CHIAVE Edit
Many people simply dismiss these complexities,Read more at location 205
proclivity to associate the arcane with the unimportantRead more at location 207
Chapter 2 What Is a Test?Read more at location 215
Note: 2@@@@@@@@@@@ UN TEST È UTILE SE LE SKILL MISURATE RAPPRESENTANO BENE QUELLE COINVOLTE NELL ASSOLVIMENTO DI UN COMPITO Edit
ON SEPTEMBER 10, 2004, a Zogby International poll of 1,018 likely voters showed George W. Bush with a 4-percentage-point lead over John Kerry in the presidential election campaign. These results were a reasonably good prediction: Bush’s margin when he won two months later was about 2.5 percent.Read more at location 216
Note: x FIDUCIA NEI SONDAGGI Edit
Occasionally, the polls are substantially wrong—theRead more at location 219
classic example is Truman versus Dewey in 1948,Read more at location 219
The basic principles underlying polling,Read more at location 222
provide a handy way to explain the workings of achievement tests.Read more at location 223
why should we care about these 1,018 people? Because together they represent the 121 millionRead more at location 228
ability to make this predictionRead more at location 234
Note: ... Edit
It depends on the design of the sample,Read more at location 235
Note: c Edit
If Zogby had sampled only individuals in UtahRead more at location 236
Note: ... Edit
the sample would not have been a good representationRead more at location 236
Note: c Edit
errors of sample design,Read more at location 239
Accuracy also depends on the way in which survey questions are worded;Read more at location 239
changes in the wording of questions can have substantial effects on respondents’ answers.Read more at location 240
Original question: “What is the average number of days each week you have butter?” Revised question: “The next question is just about butter. Not including margarine, what is the average number of days each week you have butter?”Read more at location 242
Note: x ES Edit
Finally, accuracy depends on the ability or willingness of respondentsRead more at location 248
when students are asked about parental income, for example. They may refuseRead more at location 249
“social desirability bias”: a tendency for some respondents to provide socially acceptableRead more at location 251
For example, a study published in 1950 documented substantial overreporting of several different types of socially desirable behavior. Thirty-four percent of respondents reported that they had contributed to a specific local charity when they had not, and 13 to 28 percent of respondents claimed to have voted in various elections in which they had not.Read more at location 254
Note: x ES SOCIAL BIAS Edit
Educational achievement tests are in many ways analogous to this Zogby poll in that they are a proxy for a better and more comprehensive measure that we cannot obtain.Read more at location 258
Note: x IL TEST È UN SONDAGGIO Edit
The full range of skills or knowledge about which the test provides an estimate—analogous to the votes of the entire population of voters in the Zogby survey—is generally called the domain by those in the trade.Read more at location 264
Note: x DOMINIO Edit
Chapter 3 What We Measure: Just How Good Is the Sample?Read more at location 479
Note: 3@@@@@@@@@@ Edit
there are some aspects of the goals of education that achievement tests are unable to measure.”Read more at location 482
Note: CRITICI Edit
the label “anti-testing”Read more at location 483
Tests measure what is important, their argument goes, and those who focus on other “goals” are softies.Read more at location 483
Note: X MOTTO DEI MERITOCRATICI Edit
These critics are not entirely wrong.Read more at location 484
recognize this limitation of testing,Read more at location 487
obscure paper published more than half a century ago by E. F. LindquistRead more at location 489
Note: BASE PER I CRITICI Edit
“Preliminary Considerations in Objective Test Construction.”Read more at location 490
he was remarkably prescient in anticipating controversies that engulfed the world of educationalRead more at location 501
LindquistRead more at location 506
Note: giù Edit
goals of education are diverse,Read more at location 507
only some of these goals are amenable to standardizedRead more at location 507
some other types of skills are far more difficult to test.Read more at location 509
interest in learningRead more at location 510
Note: AB NN MIS 1 Edit
ability to apply knowledgeRead more at location 511
Note: 2 Edit
The evidence shows unambiguously that standardized tests can measure a great deal that is of value,Read more at location 513
some of what it omits is very important.Read more at location 515
ITBS manual advises school administrators explicitly to treat test scores as specialized information that is a supplement to, not a replacement for, other information about students’ performance. And for the same reason, itRead more at location 516
Note: x ES DI ATTEGGIAM ACCORTO Edit
Second, Lindquist argued that even many of the goals of schooling that are amenable to standardized testing can be assessed only in a less direct fashion than we would like.Read more at location 523
Note: x SECONDA LACUNA Edit
focus of daily attention for teachers and students are just proxiesRead more at location 524
ultimate goals are too general and too remoteRead more at location 525
For example, why do we teach students algebra?Read more at location 526
to teach students how to reason algebraically so that they can apply this reasoning to the vast array of circumstances outside of school to which it is relevant. This sort of very general goal, however, is remote from decisions about the algebra content to be taught in a given middle school this Thursday morning.Read more at location 527
Note: x XCHÈ L ALGEBRA? Edit
curriculum designers and teachers must make a large number of specific decisions about what algebra to teach. For example, do students learn to factor quadratic equations? Many considerations shape these decisions, not just a subject’s possible utility in a wide range of work-related and other contexts years later.Read more at location 529
Note: c Edit
An anecdoteRead more at location 531
difference between learning content specified in a curriculum and later application of that knowledge.Read more at location 532
Many years ago, I had Sunday brunch in Manhattan with three New Yorkers. All were highly educated, and all had taken at least one or two semesters of mathematics beyond high school. In my experience, New York natives make their way about town in part by drawing on a prodigious knowledge of the location of various landmarks, such as the original Barnes and Noble store on Fifth Avenue. That Sunday morning, I found to my surprise that none of the three New Yorkers could figure out the location of the restaurant where we were to have brunch. It was on one of the main avenues, and they knew the address, but they could not figure out the cross street. I suggested that the problem might turn out to be a very simple one. I asked if they knew where the addresses on the avenues in that part of Manhattan reached zero and, if so, whether they reached zero at the same street. They quickly agreed that they did and gave me the name of the cross street. I then asked if the addresses increased at the same rate on these avenues, and if so, at what rate. That is, how many numbers did the addresses increase with each cross street? They were quite certain that the rate was the same, but it took a little more work to figure out what it was. Using a few landmarks they knew (including the original Barnes and Noble store), they figured out the rate for a couple of avenues. The rates were the same. At that point, they had the answer, although they had not yet realized it.Read more at location 532
Note: x ES DEI TRE STUDENTI PERSI A NY Edit
The problem was a simple linear equationRead more at location 542
All three were competent in dealing with algebra much more complex than this, but they had not developed the habit of thinking of real-world problems in terms of the mathematics they had learned in the classroom.Read more at location 545
Note: x LA CONDIZ DEI TRE STUD Edit
in the ideal world we would assess achievement by measuring the ultimate goalsRead more at location 551
“The only perfectlyRead more at location 552
Note: ... Edit
would be one based on direct observationRead more at location 553
But this sort of measurement is clearly impractical,Read more at location 557
a test author usually has to focus on the proximate goals of educators, even if these are only proxies for the ultimate social goals of education.Read more at location 579
Note: X RIPET IL DIFETTO Edit
we have to put all test-takers in the same environmentRead more at location 583
Note: CONOSC E ABILIT Edit
Lindquist wanted as much as practical to isolate specific knowledgeRead more at location 589
tests to include tasks that focus narrowly on these specifics.Read more at location 590
attempting to create test items that present complex, “authentic” tasks more similar to those students might encounter out of school.Read more at location 595
they conduct a “holistic” review of applicants, considering not only SAT or ACT scores but also grades, personal statements, persistence in extracurricular activities, and so on.Read more at location 609
Note: CONSIDERARE TEST MA ANCHE ALTRO Edit
in much of the testing that now dominates K–12 education, Lindquist’s advice that test scores must be seen as incomplete measures is widely ignored.Read more at location 616
Chapter 10 Inflated Test ScoresRead more at location 3298
Note: 10@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Edit
performance is getting better, and rapidly.Read more at location 3302
this good news is often more apparent than real

venerdì 24 febbraio 2017

Quell' idiota di Einstein (con un'appendice su quell'imbecille di Godel)

Un genio, quando esce dal seminato, ha la nostra stessa possibilità di dire idiozie (l’intelligenza è tremendamente specifica). L’unica differenza è che lui le dirà, noi forse no.
L’essere inetti in tutti i campi ci rende umili (e silenziosi). L’essere geni anche solo in una materia ci rende sgradevolmente vociferanti.
***
Il libro che ha scritto Neven Sesardic è sorprendente perché di solito quando pensiamo al genio che spara “stronzate” pensiamo a figure folkloristiche come Noam Chomsky o Dario Fo. Qui invece si punta al bersaglio grosso, alla “vacca sacra” del nostro immaginario.
Il libro si intitola When Reason Goes on Holiday: Philosophers in Politics e si focalizza sull’irrazionalità dei grandi filosofi quando la “buttano” in politica.
Albert Einstein non è a rigore un filosofo ma la sua teoria della relatività è un fenomenale contributo sia alla scienza che alla filosofia. Anche per questo molti lo trattano da filosofo. Per esempio, la prestigiosa Library of Living Philosophers lo etichetta scienziato-filosofo.
***
Einstein in America supportò attivamente la corsa alla presidenza Henry Wallace, ben conoscendo la sua visione pro-sovietica.
Bisogna dire che spesso Einstein fu critico con l’ URSS ma molto più spesso tentò di giustificare o evitò di condannare: aveva un debole per Lenin.
Al quinto anniversario della sua morte, spese per i dittatore queste ammirate parole…
… “In Lenin I admire a man who has thrown all his energy into making social justice real, at the sacrifice of his own person. I do not consider his method practicable. But one thing is sure: Men like him are the guardians and reformers of the conscience of mankind” (quoted in Grundmann 2005, 253)…
Cosa obiettava al regime? Di essere poco pratico. La parola usata fu “zweckmässig”, ovvero “poco adatto allo scopo”.
Nessuna condanna morale o dei metodi usati di per sé.
Di solito quando uno sa che un politico ha sterminato migliaia di innocenti non si limita a obiettare la scarsa praticità del metodo.
D’altronde, come veniva definito Lenin?…
… guardian and reformer of the conscience of mankind…
Forse non è chiaro che Einstein all’epoca aveva facile accesso a fonti attendibili che documentavano le atrocità di massa compiute dal dittatore.
Ecco una prima fonte…
… In 1924 a book titled The Red Terror in Russia, 1918–1923 appeared in Berlin (in German). The author, Sergei Melgunov, was sentenced to death by the Bolsheviks in 1919 and later, after his sentence was commuted to imprisonment, was forced into exile. The book contains a wealth of information about proclamations and actions of the Soviet government under Lenin…
Ecco una testimonianza ufficiale molto diffusa all’epoca di Martin Latsis, funzionario della Cheka…
… We are eradicating bourgeoisy as a class. Do not seek evidence during the investigation that the accused acted or spoke against [the] soviet government. The first question that you must ask would be—what class do you belong to, what is your background, upbringing, education or trade. These questions must seal the fate of the accused (Melgunov 1924, 45; emphasis added)…
Il capitolo 6 titolava “Bloody Statistics” e documentava gli orrori del regime nel dettaglio anno per anno.
Come concludere su questo punto? Che il giudizio di Einstein era un’idiozia difficilmente giustificabile…
… I am not suggesting that Einstein had to take Melgunov’s accusations at face value. My point is, rather, that in light of such and many other similar troubling reports about the Bolsheviks, a reasonable person should have been at the very least reluctant to call Lenin a “guardian…
Einstein, d’altronde, conosceva bene il peso delle sue parole sul pubblico. Non dico che fosse il papa ma quasi.
C’è poi un’altra fonte, il libro pubblicato a New York “Letters from Russian Prisons”…
… letters from many of those who had spent years under horrible conditions in labor camps just because they had expressed disagreement with the politics of the Soviet government (Berkman 1925)….
Il deludente e minimizzante commento di Einstein…
… If you study these accounts as a reader in a peaceful, well-regulated system of government, don’t imagine that those around you are different and better than those who conduct a regime of terror in Russia. Shudder to view this tragedy of human history where one murders out of fear that one will be murdered. It is the best, the most altruistic who are tortured and killed because their political influence is feared—but not just in Russia. All serious men owe a debt of gratitude to the editor of these documents. He will help to reverse this dreadful fate. After the publication of these documents the rulers of Russia will have to change their methods if they wish to continue their effort to gain moral credibility with civilized nations. They will lose all sympathy if they cannot show through a great and courageous act of liberation that they do not need to rely on bloody terror to lend support to their political ideals (in Rowe & Schulmann 2013, 412–13; emphasis added)…
Naturalmente Einstein condannava i campi ma non era disposto a vedere le ragioni di chi ad essi si ribellava. Il succo della sua reazione: “è sempre andata così”…
… “Don’t imagine that those around you are different and better than those who conduct a regime of terror in Russia!”…
Einstein optò per normalizzare il terrore e minimizzare l’indignazione delle vittime… Più tardi, però, non avrebbe normalizzato il terrore Nazi.
La sua litania era: “non succede solo in Russia…”.
Einsten sembrava preoccupato di una cosa: “i russi perderanno le simpatie degli osservatori se continuano con il loro  terrore”. Tuttavia, a giudicare da queste parole non rischiavano di perdere le sue.
***
Ma Einstein ebbe un debole anche per Stalin e per i suoi processi sommari, lo si evince, per esempio, dalla corrispondenza con Max Born…
… By the way, there are increasing signs that the Russian trials are not faked, but that there is a plot among those who look upon Stalin as a stupid reactionary who has betrayed the ideas of the revolution. Though we find it difficult to imagine this kind of internal thing, those who know Russia best are all more or less of the same opinion. I was firmly convinced to begin with that it was a case of a dictator’s despotic acts, based on lies and deception, but this was a delusion (quoted in Born 1971, 126)…
Einstein fu dapprima colpito dai processi dichiarandosi disposto a condannarli ma poi fece marcia indietro. Perché? Quale evidenza lo fece recedere? D’altronde, anche in questo caso, aveva facile accesso a molte fonti credibili.
L’opinione di Tony Judt: a quell’epoca bisognava essere proprio ottusi per non capire
… “the steady stream of absurd admissions of guilt . . . convinced only the most nakedly servile of Communist intellectuals” (Judt 1992, 102)…
Nel 1931 Einstein la combinò ancora più grossa usando la sua influenza per supportare in occidente l’idea di giustizia staliniana.
Dapprima si unì ad un gruppo di intellettuali in una campagna contro alcune persecuzioni staliniane, poi cambiò clamorosamente idea. Questa la sua giustificazione…
… I gave my signature at the time after some hesitation because I trusted in the competency and honesty of the persons who had approached me about this signature, and also because I considered it psychologically impossible that people bearing the full responsibility for implementing technical tasks of utmost importance could purposefully harm the cause they are supposed to be serving. Today I regret most profoundly that I gave this signature, because I have since lost confidence in the correctness of my views at that time. I was not sufficiently aware then that under the special conditions of the Soviet Union things were possible that are totally unthinkable to me under conditions familiar to me (Grundmann 2005, 254)…
Una spiegazione senza senso. Ce n’é abbastanza per sospettare che siano intervenute cause esterne e misteriose. Nessuna evidenza concreta viene presentata per il dietrofront.
Il caso specifico in oggetto era quello di 48 scienziati massacrati
… In the past September of 1930, there was an ominous rumbling across the land: forty-eight people—“wreckers in the food supply chain”—were sentenced to be shot. “Responses from workers” appeared in the newspapers: “Wreckers must be wiped from the face of the earth!” The front page of Izvestia proclaimed: “Crush the serpent beneath your heel!” and the proletariat demanded that the OGPU [the early name for the security and political police of the Soviet Union] be awarded the Order of Lenin (Solzhenitsyn 2011, 68)…
Uno scampato - Vladimir Tchernavin – scrisse più tardi un libro denso di particolari. Disse anche che il dietrofront di Einstein facilitò la macabra operazione.
Ma per quanto tempo Einstein mantenne questo atteggiamento ambiguo?
Risposta: per almeno sei anni.
***
Isaac Don Levine era amico stretto e interlocutore privilegiato di Einstein. Dopo l’assassinio nel 1934 di Sergei Kirov nelle purghe chiese allo scienziato di unirsi ad un protesta contro Stalin. Motivazioni del diniego…
… Einstein explained he could not join the protest because, in his opinion, its only probable effect would be in countries that were not friendly to Russia. Then he added: “Under the circumstances I regret your action and suggest you abandon it altogether.”…
Non solo Einstein si tirò fuori ma cercò di dissuadere l’amico dall’agire in tal senso.
Il fatto è che Einstein credeva in Stalin
… “Consider further that the Russians have proved that their only aim is really the improvement of the lot of the Russian people, and that they can in this regard already show important achievements” (quoted in Levine 1973, 172)…
La dolorosa risposta di Levine prima di rompere la decennale amicizia…
… “I was grieved to read your statement that the only aim of the Soviet rulers is the improvement of the people’s condition. How can one reconcile that belief with the fact that in 1933 from three to five million peasants were deliberately starved to death by the Stalin regime?” (ibid., 173)…
Nel 1948, di questi stessi fatti, Einstein dibatté pubblicamente con Sidney Hook.
Tornò di nuovo sui “grandi meriti” dei sovietici…
… I am not blind to the serious weaknesses of the Russian system of government and I would not like to live under such government. But it has, on the other side, great merits and it is difficult to decide whether it would have been possible for the Russians to survive by following softer methods (quoted in Hook 1987, 471)…
Per un esperto come Hook fu facile “inchiodarlo” alle sue idiozie…
… Precisely what methods have you in mind? I am puzzled on what evidence anyone can assert that cultural purges and terror in astronomy, biology, art, music, literature, the social sciences, helped the Russians to survive, or how the millions of victims in concentration camps of the Soviet Union, not to speak of the wholesale executions, contributed in any way to the Russian victory over Hitler…
***
Einstein non era un comunista, come mai prese parte attivamente a molte iniziative organizzate dagli “infiltrati”, per esempio la Peace Conference tenutasi nel 1949 a New York?
La Waldorf Peace Conference recava chiaramente il segno di un coinvolgimento del partito Comunista Sovietico.
Era uno sforzo della propaganda per presentare l’ URSS come la più grande forza di pace nel mondo. I prestigiosi partecipanti erano considerati degli “utili idioti”. ma qui Einstein era in buona compagnia: Rudolph Carnap, Thomas Mann, Arthur Miller, Charlie Chaplin, Linus Pauling, Leonard Bernstein…
Il Ministero USA per la sicurezza disse a chiare lettere e ufficialmente che la conferenza era manipolata…
… “none of the cultural leaders of Eastern Europe would be free to express any view other than that dictated by the political authorities in Moscow.”…
Esemplare fu il discorso del compositore Dmitri Shostakovich: lo lesse un interprete con il musicista seduto al suo fianco che “appariva nervoso e in difficoltà”. Nel discorso si affrontavano alcune critiche indirizzate al Maestro dal Comitato Centrale. Eccone un passaggio…
… “The criticism brings me much good. It helps me bring my music forward.” About Stravinsky, whose work had been condemned in the Soviet Union, Shostakovich concurred with the Party’s opinion, saying “Stravinsky betrayed his native land and severed himself from his people by joining the camp of reactionary modern musicians.”…
Shostakovich aveva fatto di tutto per disertare l’incontro (certificati medici, raccomandazioni…). Un giorno gli fu detto che avrebbe ricevuto una telefonata importante. Il telefono squillò, gli venne passato Stalin in persona che “con molta cortesia” gli chiese di partecipare assicurandosi che la linea non fosse disturbata e avesse compreso bene l’invito appena ricevuto.
Einstein, quella telefonata, non la ricevette di sicuro.
Anche il commediografo Arthur Miller partecipò. Ecco come il biografo Morris Dickstein sottolinea la patente idiozia di quella scelta…
… It was one thing . . . to be a radical in the 1930s. [But] to remain a fellow traveller throughout the 1940s, culminating in the notorious Stalinist-inspired Waldorf peace conference in New York in 1949, long after the crimes, purges, and repressions of Stalin had been exposed to the world, demanded a special kind of obtuseness (Dickstein 2009)….
D’altronde, lo stesso Einstein realizzò la cosa più tardi, anche se si guardò bene dal riconoscerlo pubblicamente…
… In answer to your cable I must frankly confess that, in view of my experience with the first congress of this kind in Wroclaw last August, and from what I have observed concerning the recent congress in New York, I have the strong impression that this kind of procedure does not really serve the cause of international understanding. The reason is simply that it is more or less a Soviet enterprise and everything is managed accordingly (in Rowe & Schulmann 2013, 481–82; emphasis added)…
Forse al ripensamento contribuì un articolo di Life uscito nel frattempo…
… Life magazine published a long article headlined “Red Visitors Cause Rumpus” that ridiculed the naïveté of those who supported the conference…
Ma come fu possibile per Einstein farsi irretire così ingenuamente in questa ragnatela? Un’ipotesi…
… an obvious suggestion would be that they, and possibly many others, had been wooed by acquaintances with moderate-sounding views who insisted that their politics were primarily progressive, resolutely anti-fascist and peace-oriented, and who carefully avoided any directly Soviet-style, crude rhetoric that could upset the people they were trying to recruit…
Nelle confessioni di Louis Budenz – una spia infiltrata – si parla di “operazione controllo remoto”. In cosa consisteva?…
… The relationships with [Thomas] Mann and Einstein were established by what the Communists called “remote control,” while I was still part of the Red leadership. The chain of communication with Mann ran through associates of his daughter Erika; while with Einstein, means of reaching him were set up at Princeton. In both instances, these men were persuaded to their pro-Communist stands by playing upon their hatred of Nazism. This I know from what I heard said in Politburo meetings. No more striking illustration could be found of the way well-known men and women of unquestionable integrity are deceived and exploited by the Communists (Budenz 1950, 211)…
Un “utile idiota” controllato a distanza come un pupazzo, questa la spiegazione più misericordiosa di certe sparate di Einstein. Questo anche se alcune connessioni del Nostro restano piuttosto inquietanti…
… Frederick S. Litten describes the case of Hilaire Noulens, an official of the Communist International (Comintern), who was arrested in China… Einstein repeatedly intervened on Noulens’s behalf, and even sent telegrams to three U.S. senators… it is unlikely Einstein did not know Noulens… why did he intervene, given that the man was a Soviet agent working on behalf of Stalin?…
Altro evento che getta ombre su Einstein…
… An additional fact that might have justifiably raised suspicions about Einstein’s involvement is that the address he used in correspondence about the case was c/o Internationale Arbeiter Hilfe (Workers International Relief), an organization founded under the auspices of the Comintern by the notorious Communist propagandist Willi Münzenberg…
La conclusione di Litten sul caso: Einstein fu qualcosa di più che un “utile idiota”…
… Litten concludes: “I believe that, temporibus illis, Einstein had laid himself open to the possibility of being used as a relay by the Comintern and Soviet intelligence, although I don’t know to what extent he had been aware of it” (ibid.)…
Ognuno giudichi da sé.
***
Si minimizzava quanto avveniva in URSS per “massimizzare” quanto avveniva negli USA, un Paese praticamente prossimo alla nazificazione.
Einstein sul fascismo a stelle e strisce
… “We have come a long way toward the establishment of a Fascist regime. The similarity of general conditions here [in the United States] to those in the Germany of 1932 is quite obvious” (letter to W. Stern, January 14, 1954, quoted in Isaacson 2007, 533). “The separation [between Jews and Gentiles] is even more pronounced [in America] than it ever was anywhere in Western Europe, including Germany” (letter to Hans Mühsam, March 24, 1948, Einstein Archives 38-371; emphasis added)…
Si unisce al delizioso coretto la voce di Kurt Gödel
… The political situation developed wonderfully here during the holidays, and you only hear of defense of the homeland, compulsory military service, increase of taxes, increase of prices, etc. I think, even in the blackest (or brownest) Hitler Germany, things were not that bad (letter to his mother, January 8, 1951, quoted in Dawson 1997, 191; emphasis added)…
Stiamo parlando del massimo logico di quei tempi e forse di tutti i tempi. Un Genio non la G maiuscola. Ma anche un vero e proprio “idiota”.
Uno dice: colpa della testa nelle nuvole. L’altro aggiunge: poco tempo da dedicare alle faccende politiche.
No! No!
La politica era interesse primario per Kurt (e anche per Albert)…
… “For the last two months I have been so much occupied with politics, that I had almost no time for anything else” (quoted in Wang 1990, 118)… “Gödel reads Lenin and Trotsky, is for planned society and socialism, and interested in the mechanism of influences in society, e.g., that of finance capital on politics” (ibid., 91)…
L’erezione del Muro di Berlino entusiasmò Kurt, anche se in lui permaneva una preoccupazione: tutte quelle fughe di civili. Come impedirle?…
… “The wall that was erected in Berlin, this is really a culmination. But the Russians are probably right that spies and saboteurs were coming there from the West” (Gödel 2002, 203)…
Per Kurt, Hitler e de Gaulle pari sono…
… “Why do you ask me whether I like de Gaulle? His foreign policy has a lot of similarity with Hitler”…
John Kennedy era visto come un filo-nazista…
… With regard to the new president [Kennedy], one sees quite clearly already where his politics is leading: war in Vietnam, war in Cuba, the belligerent Nazis or fascists (in the form of “anticommunist” organizations) beginning to bloom, more rearmament, less press freedom, no negotiations with Khrushchev, etc. (April 30, 1961, quoted in Wang 1996, 53; emphasis added)…
L’ anti-comunista, per quanto soft, era equiparato in scioltezza a “belligerent Nazis or fascists.”.
E parliamo del Kurt che nel 1935 s’iscrisse al fascistissimo Fronte Patriottico!
Dice: lo fece per lavorare. Non proprio, a quel tempo aveva già formulato il teorema dell’incompletezza e aveva richieste d assunzione da tutte le università del mondo.
Nel 1938 – dopo l’ Anschluss - la moglie di Kurt entrò nel partito Nazista. A proposito di Anschluss, sul punto Kurt osservò un rigoroso silenzio…
… Of Gödel’s letter to [American mathematician Oswald] Veblen only a burnt fragment has survived; it is dated 26 March [1938], just thirteen days after Hitler’s Anschluß [309]. It would be interesting to know what, if anything, Gödel had to say about that event, or what immediate effect it had on his life or work, but, incredibly, there is no mention of the Nazi takeover in any of Gödel’s correspondence (ibid., 127)…
Quando il fisico Hans Thirring chiese a Kurt in partenza per l’America di avvisare Einstein che i Nazi stavano costruendo l’atomica, lui si guardò bene dal farlo.
Dagli USA Kurt cercò sempre di rientrare in patria. Ma perché? la nazificazione della società procedeva ovunque spedita! Eppure Kurt scriveva a tutti (chiudendo con l’ “Heil Hitler!” di prammatica) sollecitando il suo rientro.
Forse la domanda giusta è: perché scappò? Perché rischiava di essere arruolato dopo un inattesissimo esame medico che lo aveva dichiarato “idoneo”.
***
Come concludere, dopo aver assistito a questo mesto spettacolo di idiozia mista a codardia? Forse così…
… Now it is easy to understand that reasonable people could find some aspects of American politics in the late forties and early fifties worrying or deserving condemnation. Many would especially single out the methods of Senator Joseph McCarthy in his clumsy and counterproductive attempts to deal with the dangers of Communist infiltration. But to suggest that things in America were at that time worse than in the “blackest (or brownest) Hitler Germany” or that the separation of Jews and non-Jews was “even more pronounced” in America than in the Third Reich—this borders on insanity. No, this actually crosses the border. And yet these opinions come from two of the greatest minds of the twentieth century…
Einstein Fan Art Pencil Drawing Sketch Science Geek