martedì 11 ottobre 2016

Chapter 2 Equality and Liberty - LEFTISM erik ritter von kuehnelt

Chapter 2 Equality and LibertyRead more at location 235
Note: 2@@@@@@@@@@@ Edit
Since this book is written by a Christian let us first deal with the well-known cliché according to which, even though we are neither identical nor equal physically or intellectually, we are at least “equal in the eyes of God.” This, however, is by no means the case. None of the Christian faiths teaches that we are all equally loved by God.Read more at location 236
Note: DIO JN AMA TUTTI IN MODO EGUALE Edit
Christ loved some of his disciples more than others.Read more at location 238
Note: x Edit
Nor does any Christian religion maintain that grace is given in equal amount to all men.Read more at location 238
Note: x Edit
everybody is given sufficient grace to be able to save himself, though not to the same extent.Read more at location 240
Note: x Edit
It is obvious that the Marquis de Sade and, let us say, St. Jean Vianney or Pastor von Bodelschwingh were not “equals in the eyes of God.” If they had been, Christianity no longer would make any sense, because then the sinner would equal the saint and to be bad would be the same as to be good.Read more at location 241
Note: DE SADE E FRANCESCO Edit
interesting to observe what inroads secular “democratic” thinking has made among the theologians.Read more at location 243
Note: x Edit
Obviously equality does not figure in Holy Scripture. Freedom is mentioned several times, but not equality.Read more at location 244
Note: EG E LIBERTÀ NELLE SCRITTURE Edit
they talk about adverbial equality—andRead more at location 246
Note: x Edit
They will start out saying that all men have souls equally, that they are equally called upon to save their souls, that they are equally created in the image of God, and so forth. But two persons who equally have noses or banking accounts, do not have equal noses or equal banking accounts.Read more at location 247
Note: ANALOGIA ANIMA NASO Edit
equality before the law.Read more at location 256
Note: x. CAMBIO Edit
It is obvious that a child of four having committed manslaughter (it does happen!) should be dealt with differently from a child of twelve, an adolescent of seventeen, or a mature man of thirty.Read more at location 258
Note: MINORI Edit
take “circumstance” into consideration.Read more at location 261
Note: x Edit
(irresistible urge)Read more at location 263
Note: x Edit
When the Germans were freezing in the winter of 1945-1946 Cardinal Frings of Cologne told the faithful that, under the circumstances, to steal coal was no sin,Read more at location 264
Note: CIRCOSTANZE. CARBONE Edit
Equality before the law might be highly unjust: witness the outcry, Summum ius, summa iniuria. Indeed, justice is better served by Ulpian’s principle which we have already quoted, Suum cuique, to everybody his due.Read more at location 270
Note: INGIUSTIZIA EGUAGLIAMZA Edit
A third kind of equality is invoked by a great many: equality of opportunity.Read more at location 272
Note: x OPPORTUNITÀ Edit
In the narrow sense of the term it can never be achieved and should not even be attempted. It would be much wiser to demand the abolition of unjust discrimination, arbitrary discrimination without a solid “factual” foundation.Read more at location 272
Note: IMPOSSIBILE. LOTTA ALLE DISCRI. Edit
“Just discrimination,” in other words, “preference based on merit” is conspicuously absent in a process which, in our society, has a deep and wide influence as a sanctified example—political elections. Whether it is a genuinely democratic election in the West or a plebiscitarian comedy in the East, the one-man-one-vote principle is now taken for granted. The knowledge, the experience, the merits, the standing in the community, the sex, the wealth, the taxes, the military record of the voter do not count, only the vegetable principle of age—he must be 18, 21, 24 years old and still “on the hoof.” The 21-year-old semiliterate prostitute and the 65-year-old professor of political science who has lost an arm in the war, has a large family, carries a considerable tax burden, and has a real understanding of the political problems on which he is expected to cast his ballot—they are politically equal as citizens.Read more at location 279
Note: MERITO E POLITICA. UNA TESTA UN VOTO Edit
“Equality of opportunity.” In a concrete sense, not even a totalitarian tyranny could bring this about, because no country could decree that a child upon entering this world should have “equal parents.”Read more at location 290
Note: IMPOSSIB Edit
The cry for an identical and equal education has been raised again and again in democracies, totalitarian or otherwise, and the existence of various types of schools has been deemed “undemocratic.” Just because parents are so different (every marriage offers another “constellation”) egalitarians have advocated not only intensive schooling, but boarding schools for all. Children should be taken out of their homes and collectively educated twenty-four hours a day.Read more at location 293
Note: SCHOOL Edit
However, as Friedrich August von Hayek has pointed out, a certain equality of treatment is necessary in a free society.5 Only by treating people equally do we find out who is superior to whom.Read more at location 301
Note: EGUAGLIANZA NECESSARIA Edit
By treating people equally (we are back at the adverb) we are not making them equal.Read more at location 304
Note: x Edit
The man in a free society must either blame himself (which leads to the melancholia of those plagued by inferiority complexes) or will be bound to accuse imaginary conspiracies of ill-wishers and downright enemies.Read more at location 310
Note: IL FALLITO NELLA SOC APERTA Edit
we would not be surprised to find that the number of psychological disturbances, “nervous breakdowns,” and suicides among males increases with social mobilityRead more at location 313
Note: SUICIDI E MOBILITÀ Edit
In other words, there is a real antagonism, an incompatibility, a mutual exclusiveness between liberty and enforced equality.Read more at location 328
Note: EGUAGLIANZA E LIBERTÀ Edit
French Revolution chose as its slogan “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity”—orRead more at location 329
Note: x Edit
If A is superior to B—more powerful, more handsome, more intelligent, more influential, wealthier—then B will feel inferior, ill at ease, and probably even afraid of A. If we subscribe to the famous “Four Freedoms” and accept the formulation of “Freedom from Fear,” then we can see how inequalities actually engender fear—and envy, though envy is rarely mentioned in this connection.Read more at location 331
Note: IL LEGAME XVERSO TRA EG E SUPERIORITÀ Edit

Ballerini a Rho

Ieri sera alle ore 21 presso la sala convegni Mantovani Furioli del santuario della Madonna addolorata di Rho il medico/psicanalista/scrittore Luigi Ballerini ci ha intrattenuto sul tema spinoso del rapporto tra i nostri figli e i social network: “Né dinosauri, né ingenui. Cosa resta dei rapporti nell’era di internet?”.
Interessante.
pericoli sono tanti perché su internet c’è di tutto: pornografia, violenza, estremismo, inganni… Un incontro con queste realtà perverse fatto all’età sbagliata puo’ essere veramente dannoso.
Per chiarire. Il genitore/dinosauro è quello che dice: “mio figlio puo’ fare a meno di tutto questo, io non ho avuto niente del genere e sono cresciuto benissimo”. Quello ingenuo è quello che  vede nei nuovi media solo soluzioni pratiche e mai nessun pericolo di abusi.
Il motto di Ballerini:
La sfida del virtuale si vince nel reale
Cosa significa? Che se hai una solida vita reale potrai minimizzare i rischi legati ai nuovi media e al contempo massimizzarne i benefici. Allora: passa pure parte del tuo tempo sul pc o sullo smartphone ma tieni aperte le porte di casa e scendi al bar, in piazza, all’oratorio…
Un esempio di minimizzazione dei rischi: un insulto ricevuto su whatsapp puo’ diventare distruttivo se vissuto in isolamento. Se invece dopo la chat si incontrano amici in carne e si comincia a vivere con loro, l’insulto passa presto nel dimenticatoio dissolvendosi.
Un esempio di massimizzazione dei benefici: se ho degli amici che condividono con me l’hobby del calcio posso organizzare in quattro e quattr’otto una partita.
Obiezione 1: perchè correre rischi, basta proibire finché il bambino non è attrezzato…
Risposta: la proibizione del telefonino, se i pari lo possiedono, puo’ generare esclusione. Di sicuro genera conflitto tra genitore e figlio, qualcosa di spiacevole in sé ma soprattutto qualcosa che inquina le premesse per intervenire allorché il figlio aggirerà le proibizioni.
Obiezione 2: si tratta di cose che ad un ragazzino non servono a nulla.
Risposta: forse è vero, organizzare velocemente una partita di calcio non ti cambia la vita, puoi farlo benissimo anche nel modo tradizionale. Ma resta in piedi il rischio di esclusione. Inoltre, l’esperienza precoce di internet va vista piuttosto come un’ alfabetizzazione che un vero utilizzo. L’utilizzo fruttuoso verrà dopo, man mano che la mia vita reale fornirà i suoi stimoli e le curiosità per soddisfare le quali internet è un portento. Sapersi muovere sul mezzo con una certa disinvoltura è un grande vantaggio.
Obiezione 3: un ferreo controllo risolve tutto.
Risposta: non è detto, 1) anche il controllo più ferreo è aggirabile. Inoltre, 2) una relazione fondata sul controllo ferreo ed esplicito non fa fiorire la persona, non la responsabilizza.
Bisogna aggiungere che ogni discorso serio si fa al margine. Ballerini non è stato invitato per dire: “attenti, dare un telefonino in mano ad uno scolaro delle elementari potrebbe essere pericoloso, tenetelo dunque sotto controllo”. Una cosa del genere potrebbe dirla mia nonna. Lui è stato chiamato per “aggiungere” qualcosa alle osservazioni scontate, ed ha aggiunto il suo motto.
Secondo me è stato convincente anche se da un punto di vista pratico non saprei proprio da dove partire.
baller

lunedì 10 ottobre 2016

Ballerini ottobre 2016

Isolamento... sensibilitá e disibinazione

Narcisismo

Autorità. Inflazione.

Curosità.

Solitudine.

Distrazione.

Motto: la sfida virtuale si vince nel reale.

Avere contatti reali.

Il virtuale si metterà al servizio del reale.

Vendere la moglie all'asta

La vendita della moglie all’asta è una pratica barbara? Forse, ma nella storia riveste lo statuto di antesignana del divorzio. La nostra mancanza di prospettiva storica è sempre foriera di sorprese. Eppure il Peter Leeson di “Wife Sales” parla chiaro.
Ecco la sua tesi:
…  We argue that wife sales were an institutional response to an unusual constellation of property rights in Industrial Revolution-era English law… That constellation simultaneously required most wives to obtain their husbands’consent to exit… and denied most wives the right to own property… Our analysis of wife sales as a mechanism of indirect Coasean bargaining supports the view that such sales enhanced the welfare of Industrial Revolution-era English wives… A sufficiently unhappy spouse will be willing to pay his or her marital partner enough to secure the right to exit marriage when one or both spouses has veto rights over the decision to divorce…
Per una donna era praticamente impossibile divorziare. Se solo avesse potuto pagare il marito le sue opportunità di farlo si sarebbero accresciute, senonché con il matrimonio perdeva le sue ricchezze e la possibilità di stipulare contratti economici validi. Ecco, con la vendita all’asta poteva trovare qualcuno in grado di contrattare e pagare il divorzio in suo nome. Sempre fermo il fatto che poteva porre il veto alla vendita.
… the wives who participated in wife sales chose to participate, and even those who seemed to do so reluctantly had the power to veto their sales….
La vendita della moglie all’asta non era una procedura misogina ma una procedura anti-misogina in un contesto misogino.
… Wife sales permitted unhappy wives to trade marriages they valued less for marriages they valued more…
La teoria riceve indiretta conferma dal fatto che la pratica era particolarmente diffusa nei paesi considerati avanzati.  
… For over a century wife sales occurred throughout the world’s most economically civilized nation during an era of unprecedented growth and progress: Industrial Revolution-era England…
Ma conserva anche dei problemi: in fondo il divorzio di fatto poteva contare su procedure alternative.
… The existence of numerous “ordinary” methods of de facto divorce in Industrial Revolution-era England, such as judicial separation and private separation agreement, poses a puzzle
Una prima risposta:
… Historians have suggested an answer to this puzzle: wife sales were public…   English law imposed marital obligations on spouses, such as husbands’responsibility for debts their wives incurred on their behalf. To relieve themselves of these obligations in their community’s eyes, divorcing spouses needed to inform community members, such as potential creditors, that their marital obligations to one another had ended.
Ma:
… This “explanation” for wife sales is unsatisfying in a simple but crucial way… Spouses could place ads in newspapers
Ricordiamoci che in quelle società la donna single aveva fondamentalmente gli stessi diritti dell’uomo:
… feme sole... Such a woman could own property, enter contracts, and enjoyed freedom of her person. In these respects, legally, she was like a man..
Se invece sceglieva di sposarsi, in cambio della protezione ricevuta, diventava praticamente una proprietà del marito:
… all the property she owned before marriage, and all that would have come into her possession as an unmarried woman, such as inheritance, her wages from working, and the revenues generated by real estate she formerly owned, became her husband’s exclusive property.  A married woman also lost the right to enter contracts….Her husband could beat her “within reason.” He could have sexual relations with her on demand. And he could “restrain a wife of her liberty”— i.e., imprison her in his home— “in case of any gross misbehaviour,” where he determined what constituted grossness… In return for surrendering her property rights to her husband, a woman who married received a legal claim to her and, if she had any children, her children’s, maintenance from her husband.
Tuttavia, le donne preferivano di gran lunga sposarsi, soprattutto perché sul libero mercato del lavoro i loro servigi erano poco apprezzati. La cosa, del resto, conveniva anche agli uomini:
… Compared to men, Industrial Revolution-era women’ s employment prospects were slim and the wages they earned were low. Many working-class women couldn’t earn enough to support themselves… Men also benefited from marriage. They enjoyed the economies of scale that marriage conferred…
Per quanto riguarda il divorzio, c’era un abisso tra teoria e pratica:
… In theory, Industrial Revolution-era English law granted husbands and wives the right to exit marriage— with or without their spouse’s consent— under only two circumstances: adultery and life-threatening cruelty. In practice, husbands tended to enjoy unilateral property rights over marriage…
Il divorzio vero e proprio era molto costoso e accessibile quindi solo agli uomini (che detenevano la ricchezza):
… After obtaining a judicial separation, the typical husband seeking a private Act of Parliament sued his wife’s lover for criminal conversation in a civil court. Victory here was helpful to proving to Parliament that his wife was an adulterer. Having satisfied Parliament of as much, the Act-seeking husband secured a divorce from his wife that freed him of all…nancial obligations to her and permitted both spouses to remarry. The cost of this process was enormous… a private Act of Parliament could run into the thousands of pounds. In 1871 a successful unskilled laborer earned a mere 75p a week…
dati parlano chiaro, solo con una famiglia di provenienza estremamente facoltosa ed influente alle spalle la donna poteva spuntarla:
… An unhappy wife could also seek divorce through a private Act of Parliament. But… the obstacles to success she faced were far greater… of the 338 persons who attempted to divorce their spouses using a private Act of Parliament in the 157 years from this instrument’s inception in 1700 to its termination in 1857, only 8 were wives. 318 husbands petitioned successfully, but only 4 wives did so…
Restava l’arma delle separazioni o divorzi di fatto. Per gli uomini tutto era facile, nella sostanza valeva il ripudio:
… An unhappy husband could obtain a judicial separation by proving his wife had committed adultery. In this case the court would award him an alimony free separation. Even without such proof, he could obtain a judicial separation indirectly by manipulating the law’s operation. He did this by kicking his wife out of his house… Under English law husbands were required to supply their wives housing. This was part of their maintenance obligation. If a husband exiled his wife, his wife could, through an agent, sue her husband for restitution of conjugal rights — the right to cohabit — in an ecclesiastic court. The husband could then refuse to allow her back into his home, at which point the court would award a separation and alimony for the wife. If he was unsatisfied with paying his wife alimony, a husband could wait for his wife to slip and sue her in an ecclesiastic court for adultery. This freed him from future alimony payments…
Per le donne la musica era diversa:
… For an unhappy wife, separating from her spouse judicially was much harder. In principle the law allowed wives to sue for judicial separation on the grounds of adultery or life-threatening cruelty… An  important constraint on an unhappy wife’ s ability to use judicial separation to divorce her husband was the fact that judicial separation left her in a state of feme covert
Anche la fuga solitaria non era una via praticabile:
… Wives were in large part their husbands’property. Thus the law permitted husbands to forcibly return deserting wives to their homes where they could con… ne them to prevent future escape…
La fuga con l’amante era altrettanto problematica:
… elopement posed another problem for unhappy wives: it could be hard to build relationships with lovers willing to run away with them in secret. Husbands exercised close oversight over their wives…
L’unica scappatoia era l’accordo:
… The…nal means of de facto divorce in Industrial Revolution-era England was private separation agreements. These agreements were contracts between spouses relieving them of some of marriage’s obligations….
Ma senza possibilità di conguaglio gli accordi disponibili si riducevano drasticamente. Inoltre c’era il problema della validità di questi contratti.
… Unfortunately, not all unhappy wives were able to use private separation agreements for this purpose. Until the 1840s, such agreements were not reliably enforceable… This meant, for example, that a husband who agreed to separate from his wife under a private contract but subsequently changed his mind might forcibly seize her to reestablish cohabitation or, similarly, sue for the restitution of his conjugal rights and do so successfully…
Se questo è il contesto, comincia a profilarsi come razionale la possibilità di vendere la moglie.
… If transaction costs were low, when a wife valued life outside her marriage more than her husband valued life inside it, she could simply buy the right to exit the marriage from him… crucial assumption: wives must have something with which they can buy the right to exit marriage from their husbands…. Wife sales achieve this by leveraging the property rights of third parties: “suitors” who value unhappy wives more than wives’current husbands value them… To identify the suitor whose valuation is highest, inefficiently married couples sell their better halves at public auctions… Wives’veto power over their sales is crucial to such an arrangement’…
Il geniale artificio beneficiava soprattutto i meno abbienti. La procedura adottata era simile a quella impiegata per il bestiame.
… Industrial Revolution-era English wife sales were used overwhelmingly by working-class couples…. Next his wife was auctioned o ¤ amidst cattle and horses. An auctioneer prefaced the bidding by extolling the virtues of the wife on the block… The wife sale terminated one marriage and began another. To formalize such sales, the parties involved sometimes procured the services of a lawyer… “in many instances the wife appears to have been retained because she did not like her purchaser”… The necessity of wives’consent to be sold to new husbands explains the happiness many wives displayed at their sales’ conclusion…
Spesso era l’amante a comprare. Il che spiega anche come molte vendite si concludessero saltando l’asta vera e propria.
… For example, one couple decided that they should resort to a wife sale “hav[ ing] lately lived together on unpleasant terms, in consequence of the wife having a strong ‘affinity’ for a man on the opposite side of the street” (The Illustrated Police News, November 19, 1870)… The frequent existence of a ready and likely high bidder— a wife’ s lover— explains why some wife sales were transacted without auctions
Altre volta la moglie era riscattata da membri della famiglia di origine.
… In other cases wives’winning bidders weren’t men seeking new mates at all. They were wives’ family members
Bisogna anche considerare cos’era il diritto nella GB dell’epoca: le procedure informali consolidate avevano molto più valore di oggi, specie in quei paesi anglo-sassoni che sacralizzavano la “common law”:
…  while the law did not consider divorces or marriages achieved through wife sales legitimate, several jurists expressed confusion about whether wife selling per se was prohibited… it was founded on a custom preserved by the people, a custom, perhaps, that it would even be dangerous to pass a law which abolished it”… Religious authorities’attitudes toward wife sales were equally confused. Some religious authorities condemned wife selling. But others seemed to condone it, if not in word, in practice…
L’asta delle mogli fu un’istituzione molto apprezzata a giudicare dal successo riscosso, evidentemente produceva soddisfazione diffusa. Andò calando allorché la legge cominciò a riconoscere dei diritti patrimoniali alle mogli. Tutto cio’ è in linea con la teoria.
…Between 1735 and 1899 the mean wife in our sample sold for £ 5.72, though prices vary signi… cantly by decade. In every decade, however, both mean and median wife prices are positive… Wife sales decline when English law grants wives property rights… This new legal environment greatly diminished the importance of wife sales as means for unhappy wives to purchase the right to exit their ine ¢ cient marriages from their husbands indirectly. In consequence, wife sales declined precipitously…Although wife sales didn’ t become exceptional until the turn of the 20th century, their usage may have begun to go into decline some 17 years before the…rst English legal change granting wives some property…
COMMENTI PERSONALI
Chissà che la vendita all’asta della moglie non fu anche un antidoto al femminicidio. In fondo è un modo di concludere una relazione senza ferire l’orgoglio maschile. Oggi che conosciamo meglio le dinamiche di questo crimine sappiamo quanto sia preziosa una simile risorsa.
 wife