martedì 24 aprile 2018

Commandment 3 Avoid Experts

Commandment 3 Avoid Experts
Note:3@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

Yellow highlight | Page: 21
Did you read What to Expect When You’re Expecting? Of course you did. Or your spouse did. Everyone did. I did. I found it very helpful. And horrible.
Note:IL LIBRO

Yellow highlight | Page: 21
as the introduction to the fourth edition cheerfully proclaims, “More symptoms and more solutions than ever before.”
Note:MAREA DI SINTOMI

Yellow highlight | Page: 21
Let’s take a glance at the twenty-nine pages on “eating well.” (Not to be confused with the brand extension, What to Eat When You’re Expecting—a whole book. By the time you’re done reading it, the baby’s in law school.)
Note:MANGIAR BENE

Yellow highlight | Page: 22
“Each bite during the day is an opportunity to feed that growing baby of yours healthy nutrients.” Not each meal. Not each day. Each bite has to be carefully considered
Note:OGNI BOCCONE CONTA

Yellow highlight | Page: 22
maybe the slow class at school for junior. Maybe weight problems for life. Or worse.
Note:SE MN CURI OGNI BOCCONE

Yellow highlight | Page: 22
“better birthweight, improved brain development, reduced risk for certain birth defects. . . .”
Note:I BENEFICI

Yellow highlight | Page: 22
she is left to feel that she’s a horrible person.
Yellow highlight | Page: 22
“Lose the guilt, hold the deprivation, and allow yourself a treat every once in a while.” A treat that will make “your tastebuds jump for joy.” And what exactly would that fantastic treat be? “A blueberry muffin.”
Note:INCITAMENTO

Yellow highlight | Page: 22
on the one hand, it’s hard to argue with a book that says pregnant women should be eating well. On the other hand, it’s hard not to argue with a book that drives pregnant women crazy.
Note | Page: 22
AMBIVALENZA

Yellow highlight | Page: 22
As an obstetrician who teaches at Mt. Sinai Hospital in New York City, this is the sum total of his dietary advice for expectant moms: “Just eat like you have your whole life, but eat a little more.”
Note:RICETTA ALTERNATIVA

Yellow highlight | Page: 23
(Aren’t the people who think about the consequences of each bite generally referred to as anorexics?)
Note:ANORESSIA

Yellow highlight | Page: 23
hyperconsciousness—the
Yellow highlight | Page: 23
you would fail or at least forget the million particulars that you’re supposed to do. And then you’ll feel bad.
Note:SENTIRSI INADEMPIENTI ########## SU FACEBOOK FIN QUI

Yellow highlight | Page: 23
The Happiest Toddler on the Block—ah yes, let’s compete for whose kid is happier—teaches
Note:COMPETIZIONE TRA I GENITORI

Yellow highlight | Page: 24
What if you want to encourage good behavior in your child? Saying “Yay!” is no longer enough. Happiest Toddler suggests rewarding moppets “with a pen check mark on the back of their hands when they have done something good.”
Note:TIMBRINI

Yellow highlight | Page: 24
“First, my Lord, you woke up and did proceed not to throw your binky across the room. Huzzah, huzzah. Then, my Lord, when it was time for the day’s morning repast, you did splendidly wield your spoon like a big boy . . .”
Note:LITANIA DA RIPETERE OGNI SERA

Yellow highlight | Page: 24
not just basic advice like “Try not to yell very much.” No, they tell you the exact words, like you’re a bumbling amateur who needs a script to say the right thing.
Note:OGNI PAROLA

Yellow highlight | Page: 24
in a book with the really promising title Am I a Normal Parent? there’s a whole section on how not to quash your child’s will to live when he asks if you like the picture he drew.
Note:I SUOI DISEGNI

Yellow highlight | Page: 24
“One way to help your child trust your response would be to take a minute or so to really look at the drawing and then, instead of commenting on the final product, say something about the process. For example, you might say, ‘I like the way you drew a black circle around the sun to make it stand out. I also like the red shirt on the boy in the picture. It reminds me of the shirt you wore to your last birthday party.’
Note:COME REAGIRE

Yellow highlight | Page: 25
So I guess “That’s beautiful, hon!” makes them think we’re total liars and the world is a stinking cesspool of phonies?
Yellow highlight | Page: 25
That same book has a whole page about whether to tell your child the tooth fairy is hooey—a
Note:LO GNOMO DEL DENTINO

Yellow highlight | Page: 25
Why do we suddenly need an expert telling us how to broach this touchy subject?
Yellow highlight | Page: 25
“What books and videos should I choose for my child’s potty library?” Her what?
Note:SCEGLIRRE I LIBRI

Yellow highlight | Page: 25
Is your child studying for an advanced degree in Potty Studies?
Yellow highlight | Page: 26
But when an author starts telling you not only to read potty books aloud to your child but to “extend your child’s favorite potty stories and songs into everyday play situations” and to “use hand puppets, finger puppets or spoon puppets to have a conversation about potty
Yellow highlight | Page: 26
Where did this bizarre reliance on these folks come from? And can we wean ourselves off of it?     Jillian Swartz, editor in chief of the online magazine Family Groove, believes it all started the same way the Food Network did, sort of. “Every ten years or so,” says Swartz, “a new, once-mundane job becomes deified. Think: Chefs in the nineties and handymen and home decorators in the two thousands.” About twenty years or so ago, another lowly job suddenly became chic: motherhood.
Note:LAVORI DI MODA. CUOCO DECORATORE... MAMMA

Yellow highlight | Page: 27
fetishization of every last mother-loving detail of parenthood, and an ever-burgeoning breed of experts to propagate this often mind-numbing minutiae.
Note:FETICISMO

Yellow highlight | Page: 27
The avalanche of expert advice—and nonexpert advice on nonetheless very enticing Web sites—undermines our belief that we are equipped with enough common sense
Note:IL DUBBIO SUL SENSO COMUNE

Yellow highlight | Page: 27
That battered confidence, in turn, leads us to look ever more desperately to the experts wherever we find them.
Note:PAURE E VENDITORI DI RICETTE

Yellow highlight | Page: 27
we feel like failures.
Yellow highlight | Page: 27
Then when—surprise—our kids turn out not to be perfect, we know who’s to blame. We are!
Note:SAPPIAMO CHI ACCUSARE: NOI

Yellow highlight | Page: 27
If only we’d put aside that deep-fried Oreo in our second trimester, she’d be in the gifted program at school. And if our child is cranky? Uncommunicative? Headed for five to ten years’ hard labor? That just might be because we told her, “Look, sweetie, a broken cracker is not the end of the world!” instead of saying, “Oooh, your cracker broke. Sad sad sad sad sad!” and respectfully relating.
Note:IL LAMENTO DELLA DISPERATA

Yellow highlight | Page: 27
So what’s the alternative? Reading every book and article and trying to do absolutely all the stuff they recommend? (She asked rhetorically.) Or avoiding the experts entirely and perhaps missing out on some good advice? Well, it’s obviously somewhere in the middle,
Note:SOLUZIONE

Yellow highlight | Page: 28
Barrett says, “Look for credentials.”
Note:CREDENZIALI

Yellow highlight | Page: 28
ask your doctor to recommend a reliable book.
Yellow highlight | Page: 28
They’re more ready to believe the ones who say, “Whatever you’ve heard is fine, isn’t.”
Note:VOGLIA D INCONSUETO

Yellow highlight | Page: 28
fear sells?)
Note:LA PAURA FA VENDERE

Yellow highlight | Page: 28
Most of us came of age right alongside the consumer protection movement. As kids we learned that car companies knew about brake problems but hid them from the public, even as the cigarette manufacturers knew they were giving us cancer but pretended that they didn’t. Understandably, we grew up pretty cynical. But over the years, as we stopped trusting additives and preservatives and pesticides and saccharine and Western medicine and government and pretty much anything that wasn’t an organic potato wrapped in a recycled paper bag from Whole Foods, some of us just threw up our hands and decided it was impossible to trust anything or anyone. (Except Oprah.) The minute we heard something new and nefarious about a time-honored product or practice, a whole lot of us were ready to embrace it. Shampoo gives you cancer? We knew it!
Note:DEGENERAZIONE DEL PENSIERO CRITICO

Yellow highlight | Page: 29
But as Barrett points out (knowing full well he will sound like just another “establishment” source not to be trusted): most companies really do not try to sell us deadly or defective products. Even if they have no corporate conscience whatsoever, doing wrong is still not worth it to them, because if they harm a single child, they’ll have to recall millions of products.
Note:MULTINAZIONALI

Yellow highlight | Page: 29
So we have a choice: we can trust the self-proclaimed experts warning us that our body wash is toxic—and by the way, so is everything else—or we can just be glad we’re living in a highly regulated society that truly isn’t teeming with killer products.
Note:L ALTERNATIVA

Yellow highlight | Page: 29
Dr. Spock famously began his baby care book with these reassuring words: “Trust yourself. You know more than you think you do.” The mantra of today’s experts—“Trust us.
Note:FIDATI DI TE

Yellow highlight | Page: 29
remember that the best child-rearing advice boils down to the old basics. Listen to your kids. Love them. Keep them out of oncoming traffic.
LE BASI

CONOSCERE PER DELIBERARE COME PROGRAMMA POLITICO

Per molti bisogna “conoscere per deliberare” ma l’insistenza su questo punto è anche un programma politico visto che “conoscere” (*) cambia le nostre credenze. Esempio:
1. POLITICA ESTERA: chi conosce è più interventista, più colomba e meno falco, più incline a valorizzare le organizzazioni internazionali…
2. SOCIETA’: chi conosce diventa progressista, pro-choice, per i matrimoni gay, contro i crocifissi e le preghiere nelle scuole…
3. ECONOMIA: chi conosce diventa conservatore, taglia la spesa, contiene il welfare, tiene in ordine i conti, decentra i poteri, appoggia politiche pro-market e pro-business…
(*) Faccio riferimento solo a conoscenze oggettive, o meglio, “conosce” chi risponde correttamente a domande del tipo: quanti membri ha il Senato? La Russia è membro dell’ OCSE? E della NATO? A quanto ammonta in termini percentuali sul PIL la spesa per la Difesa? E quella per gli aiuti internazionali? Le rapine sono aumentate o diminuite nel quinquennio 2010-2015? Eccetera.

AMAZON.COM
The greatest obstacle to sound economic policy is not entrenched special interests or rampant lobbying, but the popular misconceptions, irrational beliefs, and personal biases held by ordinary voters. This is economist Bryan Caplan's sobering assessment in this provocative and eye-opening book. C...

lunedì 23 aprile 2018

LETTRICI CON IL PANCIONE

LETTRICI CON IL PANCIONE
I libri su cosa fare quando un bimbo è in arrivo (“cosa vi aspetta quando aspettate”) sono talmente voluminosi e sta-carichi di inquietanti sintomi sempre nuovi con annesse centinaia di soluzioni cangianti che se una non si distrae e si mette d’impegno forse riesce a finirli quando il figlio è in quarta elementare.
AMAZON.COM
FREE RANGE KIDS has become a national movement, sparked by the incredible response to Lenore Skenazy's piece about allowing her 9-year-old ride the subway alone in NYC. Parent groups argued about it, bloggers, blogged, spouses became uncivil with each other, and the media jumped all over it. A lo...
Mi piaceVedi altre reazioni

THE END

Tutti conoscono la curva di Gauss ma pochi quella di Gause, eppure in biologia è fondamentale perché illustra la nostra sorte come specie: l’estinzione. Magari non proprio l’estinzione ma comunque il ridimensionamento. Georgii Gause era innamorato dei moscerini, li chiudeva nelle sue ampolle con cibo a volontà e poi stava a guardare quel che succedeva: nell’abbondanza questi cominciavano a riprodursi a ritmi frenetici per poi rallentare fino al collasso allorché le scorte venivano meno. Prese nota con cura della curva demografica e stabilì la sua legge universale delle popolazioni, un formalismo mai smentito: abbondanza, crescita, esaurimento, rallentamento, collasso. E se il collasso non arriva dal carburante in esaurimento arriverà da un nuovo predatore che la farà finita. La posizione dei biologi è chiara: apocalisse vicina. I biologi ridacchiano dei “tecnologici”: non si è mai visto un animale in grado di produrre all’infinito il suo carburante. Ma sono ironici anche verso gli ambientalisti: non si è mai visto un animale che sappia frenare i suoi istinti fondamentali.
AMAZON.COM
In forty years, the population of the Earth will reach ten billion. Can our world support so many people? What kind of world will it be? In this unique, original and important book, Charles C. Mann illuminates the four great challenges we face – food, water, energy, climate change –...

QUANDO L'UOMO RICEVETTE L’ANIMA?

QUANDO L'UOMO RICEVETTE L’ANIMA?
Secondo Mark Stoneking, ricercatore al Max Planck Institute di Lipsia, 107.000 anni fa, lo suggeriscono i pidocchi. Ne esistono infatti di due tipi, quello dei capelli (humanus capitis) e quello della pelle (humanus corporis): il primo ha dato origine ad una sub-specie che si è adattata ai vestiti dell'uomo sopravvivendo solo grazie alla loro presenza. La mutazione decisiva sembrerebbe risalire proprio all’epoca indicata. Evidentemente fu allora che la “scimmia nuda” cominciò a vestirsi e a diventare “uomo”. L’abbigliamento è una tecnologia tutt’altro che banale, oltre a proteggerci da freddo e caldo è anche deposito di ornamenti e simboli, con i vestiti possiamo ben dire che nasce la cultura. Il vestito ci trasforma da primati in persone, non a caso in quella stessa epoca vengono rinvenuti in Africa manufatti proto-artistici come conchiglie incise, giavellotti decorati, perline e collane, in Medio Oriente si rinvengono anche le prime sepolture di cadaveri… avevamo ricevuto la nostra anima, stavamo diventando "esseri umani".
AMAZON.COM
In forty years, the population of the Earth will reach ten billion. Can our world support so many people? What kind of world will it be? In this unique, original and important book, Charles C. Mann illuminates the four great challenges we face – food, water, energy, climate change –...

sabato 21 aprile 2018

LETTERA ALLA ROCKFELLER FOUNDATION

LA LETTERA
Nel 1946, per strappare qualche finanziamento alla Rockefeller Foundation, William Vogt scrisse una lettera infuocata che cambiò per sempre l'impostazione di questo munifico benefattore; la fondazione venne aspramente rimproverata di combattere le peggiori malattie con l'effetto indiretto di aumentare la popolazione povera al mondo senza poi preoccuparsi del suo nutrimento, e il poco che veniva fatto in questo ambito era nella direzione sbagliata, potenziare agricoltura e industria, infatti, non era la risposta: se nel lago sono rimasti dieci pesci e gli affamati sono diventati cento aumentare la capienza delle reti non serve a nulla, quel che occorre è cambiare radicalmente il nostro rapporto complessivo con la natura. Cominciava così l'era dell'aiuto a suon di preservativi ed aborti: l'uomo come sostanza inquinante.
#Amazon
AMAZON.COM
In forty years, the population of the Earth will reach ten billion. Can our world support so many people? What kind of world will it be? In this unique, original and important book, Charles C. Mann illuminates the four great challenges we face – food, water, energy, climate change –...

IL GRANDE SCAMBIO INTERNETTIANO

IL GRANDE SCAMBIO INTERNETTIANO
Accesso libero contro pubblicità personalizzata. Cosa accadrà quando le nuove regole sulla privacy lo impediranno?
HBR.ORG
The days of trading your personal information for free content are over.