mercoledì 4 dicembre 2013
Politiche monetarie espansive: chi ci guadagna.
"Ultra-Low Interest Rates: Who Wins? Who Loses?" http://feedly.com/k/1bhvSC9
martedì 3 dicembre 2013
lunedì 2 dicembre 2013
domenica 1 dicembre 2013
Politiche anticicliche liberiste
http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2013/04/the_grave_evil.html?fb_action_ids=10101304625107777&fb_action_types=og.likes&action_object_map=%5B434510903337723%5D&action_type_map=%5B%22og.likes%22%5D&action_ref_map=%5B%22.UpoF02CTQnp.like%22%5D&fb_ref=.UpoF02CTQnp.like&fb_source=other_multiline
sabato 30 novembre 2013
Principio di precauzione
"David Friedman on the Precautionary Principle, by David Henderson" http://feedly.com/k/Ixz3yz
venerdì 29 novembre 2013
TOLLERA IL BRUTTO E AVRAI PIU' BELLEZZA
La società consumistica elargisce un... - Riccardo Mariani:
'via Blog this'
https://www.facebook.com/riccardo.mariani.585/posts/10202879147046861
'via Blog this'
https://www.facebook.com/riccardo.mariani.585/posts/10202879147046861
La società consumistica elargisce un insegnamento estetico di primordine: è dalla tolleranza del brutto che scaturisce il bello.
Un confronto tra Italia e Germania.
“… if you go to Germany or you go to Switzerland and you go through the countryside, there are all these houses that are exactly the same, [only] a little variation. Sometimes they even have coordinated geranium flowers. It looks beautiful—a great place for a vacation… The landscape is tightly regulated in these countries, curbing individuality and experimentation in the name of good design…
Things are different in Italy, which also happens to be famous for its wildly creative design industries. If you go to the Italian countryside where people really live and work, you cannot find two houses that look the same. It’s continuous experimentation. And 99 percent of them are ugly, but ugly—ugly, ugly, ugly… But, he suggests, the culture that allows that experimentation, tolerating failures, is the same culture that produces aesthetic breakthroughs…”
It is tolerance for the ugliness that is the basis for the greatness of Italian design…”
The Substance of Style: How the Rise of Aesthetic Value Is Remaking Commerce, Culture, and Consciousness (P.S.) by Virginia Postrel
BELLEZZA E CULTURA ESTETICA
Estetica e scienza possono convivere nelle... - Riccardo Mariani:
'via Blog this'
'via Blog this'
Estetica e scienza possono convivere nelle nostre scuole?
Contro (Joanne Jacobs):
“I complain that schools teach children PowerPoint rather than critical writing and reward attractive presentations that get basic facts wrong. In science, the lab report is another chance to shine graphically—even if that lovely diagram refutes Galileo… “Dumb, But Pretty”… Students are spending lots of time on aesthetics instead of traditional academic pursuits…”
Pro (Virginia Postrel):
“If a science teacher accepts a diagram that contradicts Galileo, the teacher’s ignorance, not the graphic design, is to blame. Galileo himself was not just a great scientist, mathematician, and writer but an accomplished draftsman who recorded his lunar observations in watercolors. Before romanticism declared art the province of a talented, bohemian few, drawing and painting were both common scientific tools and signs of personal refinement. Galileo used pictures as well as words to persuade. His work was smart and pretty…”
The Substance of Style: How the Rise of Aesthetic Value Is Remaking Commerce, Culture, and Consciousness (P.S.)
by Virginia Postrel
by Virginia Postrel
BELLEZZA E CPI BIAS
I tempi sono grami, per la prima volta dal... - Riccardo Mariani:
'via Blog this'
'via Blog this'
I tempi sono grami, per la prima volta dal dopoguerra la generazione dei figli vivrà peggio rispetto a quella dei padri. Lo si sente dire spesso, ma ne siamo poi così sicuri? Attenzione perché PIL e redditi stagnanti sono un indicatore ingannevole. Per capirlo, niente di meglio che ragionare pensando al “bello” e al ruolo crescente dell’ estetica nella società contemporanea.
Much of the value created through aesthetics doesn’t make it into the economic data that shape perceptions and policy. The problem isn’t with the statisticians, who are neither careless nor incompetent. Intangible goods like aesthetics are inherently difficult to measure and count, especially if competition means their value isn’t reflected in higher prices…
… Consider women’s shoes. Embroidered and beaded shoes used to sell for luxury prices, no less than $100 a pair and usually more. They required skilled artisans to make, so moderately priced shoes couldn’t cover the manufacturing expense. But in the late 1990s, automation drove down the cost of these adornments and improved their durability. Because sophisticated skills were no longer needed, the work could be done in cheap labor markets like China…
Did fancy shoemakers suddenly garner enormous profits? Not at all. The shoe business is far too competitive. Instead, embroidery and beads began to appear on shoes selling for $70 instead of $250. “Because the savings in labor costs are mostly passed on to the consumer…
… Adjusted for inflation, the price of a movie ticket in 2001 was lower than in 1990 and much lower than its peak in 1971, yet sound systems and special effects are substantially improved. Holding other quality factors constant, moviegoers get more for their money today… ecc. ecc. ecc.
More important than the direct policy effects is the data’s psychological effect. Incomes LOOK STAGNANT even while LIVING STANDARDS are rising. Since we so quickly become accustomed to higher aesthetic standards, we forget what things used to be like…
We look at the official data and conclude we’re poorer than we really are…
Missing some of the economy’s greatest advances, we believe pessimists who say progress has effectively ended. Or we focus all our optimism on flashy technology and miss the incremental improvements in everyday life…”
The Substance of Style: How the Rise of Aesthetic Value Is Remaking Commerce, Culture, and Consciousness (P.S.) by Virginia Postrel
Iscriviti a:
Post (Atom)